Topic: Should Trump select Tucker Carlson as his VP running mate?
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc started this discussion 2 years ago #116,561 Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 13 minutes later[^] [v] #1,286,715 Only in America
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,727 He’s going to pick a woman to counter Harris. I’d guess Stefanik, Noem, or heck even Haley.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,728 @previous (C)
Zero chance he's picking Haley. Stefanik is very likely. Personally I want Ivanka.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,731 He should pick me for the laughs.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,732 @previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Will you help him end the Ukraine war in 24 hours?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,733 @previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Give the Tatars an old nuke and let them set it off in Red Square
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago , 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,754 @1,286,732 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Yes I will offer $1 million to each Russian soldier who switches sides in the war. If 500,000 soldiers take me up on it, it will cost only $500 billion which we will just pay mostly with frozen Russian assets in the west. Problem solved in a relatively nonviolent way!
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 35 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,755 He should select Bert.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago , 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,789 @1,286,754 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What about the other 28 million?
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 27 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,790 @previous (E)
> What about the other 28 million?
More pentinently, what are those 500000 turncoats going to be armed with?
https://time.com/6694885/ukraine-russia-ammunition/
"When America promises to protect you, never, ever, ever believe them" - Sun Tzu.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago , 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,791 @previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
They fight the Russians without bullets, by depriving them of themselves, instantly giving the same effect as killing 500 thousand soldiers (except now they have houses and commit crimes in America)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 18 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,793 @1,286,790 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Like Sun Tazoo said?!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago , 36 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,798 @1,286,790 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
The beauty is they wouldn't even need to fight! They could all just lounge around Kyiv and have a good time. If 500.000 Russian soldiers abandoned their positions, the war would be over in days with minimal casualties to both sides.
.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 2 years ago , 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,801 @1,286,789 (E)
Russia probably does not have 28 million soldiers it can deploy quickly to the front lines so we will have time to come up with a plan B for them.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 15 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,802 @1,286,798 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Or the brass would just use cruise missiles and nukes.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 22 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,809 @1,286,798 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Kyiv
Legit lol'd.
I love hearing Western politicians try to out-sycophant one another to Action Man by over-pronouncing it "KYIIIIIIIIIV", instead of what they've always called it (Kiev). Weird also that when it comes to any other Ukrainian city - and indeed "Ukraine" itself - they still use either the proper 'Russian' pronunciations, or the Western ones. I'm desperate to hear Biden say "Russia will never, ever take KYIIIIIIIIIV, because we will support OOOKRAYEEEEENA for as long as it takes!"
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago , 16 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,810 @1,286,802 (H)
They wouldn't use nukes (that's one thing that would actually get Putin CIA'd) and they're already launching missiles.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,811 @1,286,809 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
lol
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago , 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,814 @1,286,809 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Wait until you hear about the protest because Sainsbury's didn't rename them to Chicken Kyivs
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 6 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,891 @1,286,809 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Minichan moderators don't count as western politicians
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago , 16 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,893 @previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
80% of imageboards are run by spooks, wake up.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,901 @1,286,891 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
I really hope "Taipei" sounds retarded in Taiwanese, something like "Chiwallabingbong". I can't wait to see the impending #SlavaTaiwan🇹🇼 brigade start saying dumb shit like "We need to support CHIIIIIWALLABIIIIINGBOOOOONG" for as long as it takes!"
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,902 @previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
haha you sound upset
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 54 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,904 Anonymous K replied with this 2 years ago , 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,906 @previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> I am upset
:)
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,909 @previous (K)
> I am upset
We know :)
Anonymous K replied with this 2 years ago , 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,911 @previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
thanks for confirming that you're upset :)
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,913 @previous (K)
> thanks
Welcome :)
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,923 @1,286,901 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Ok I was wondering how you hoped Taipei sounds in Taiwanese
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,924 @previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
As of today your government is booting out refugees who fled Ukraine in terror:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/4/they-fled-ukraine-to-the-netherlands-why-are-they-being-expelled
Why are you not #StandingWithUkraine #ForAsLongAsItTakes?
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,928 @previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
How old are you?
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,932 @1,286,924 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
I wonder how they hope the Taiwanese pronounce Taipei
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,952 Oh God yuck 🤮
Tucker as VP would kill 90% of my enthusiasm for Trump 2024.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 53 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,965 @previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Why
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago , 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,983 @1,286,924 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
They're kicking out Africans who could easily go home but instead choose to leech from the system designed to provide for real Ukrainians
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago , 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,024 @1,286,965 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
I can't stand Tucker. That's why.
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago , 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,025 dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,028 @1,287,024 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Doesn't he have the same opinions as trump
Anonymous K replied with this 2 years ago , 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,029 @1,287,024 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Yes you can.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago , 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,033 @1,287,024 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Why? You seem to love batshit crazy, stupid-ass fascists.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,097 @previous (F)
> fascists.
I don't think this word means what you think it means.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago , 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,149 @1,286,965 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
> Why
Not racist enough probably
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago , 23 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,156 @1,287,028 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Mostly, I guess. Tucker's changed his politics two or three times though over the years so who knows?
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,183 @previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Idk whom this guy is besides he interviewed putin
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,187 It's odd that prissy, effete men have become the face of conservative politics
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 41 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,197 @previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Were they not always
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago , 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,198 @previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
We've had presidents who constantly started fist fights and brought wild beasts into the White House
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago , 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,216 @previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
By always I meant the last 40 50 years
↕