Notice: Proxies are blocked from creating accounts. Please visit the site without using a proxy first or restore your ID.

Minichan

Topic: Dutch elections draad 4 - The Formation pt. 2: Reckoning

dw !p9hU6ckyqw started this discussion 2 months ago #116,274

A new round of formationings has started and this time led by Kim Putters! He shall talk to all the twenty or so parties to inventarise and whatnot.

Indie the Grate joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,284,135

@OPenis
Upgrade to FPTP.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,137

@previous (Indie the Grate)
Does that mean fully pooped two pants?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 2 months ago, 24 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,139

That's crazy

Indie the Grate replied with this 2 months ago, 7 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,140

@1,284,137 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Yes.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,142

Screenshot of a satanic JPEG of Kim Putters

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,484

Timmermans (GL-PvdA) said Wilders, Meloni, et al are Putin's "most useful of useful idiots"

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,547

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Instead of hiring idiots, Putin should hire intelligent people. They'd be a lot more effective.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,564

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
idiots are effective at running things badly
the gop comes to mind
maybe he likes it but ud think Russians want a better effective govt
odd

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,284,567

@previous (D)
He did mention trump as well

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 2 months ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,285,021

Rutte says when told he's known as a Trump whisperer that as a dutch citizen he cannot vote in the United States. So he has to dance with whoever is on the dance floor

(Edited 26 minutes later.)

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 24 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,285,029

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
This is literally libel. Stop.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,285,030

@previous (E)
It is a literal quote

Erik !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 21 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,285,034

Why can your country not form a government? Even Afghanistan managed it

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,285,036

@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Because no one wants to work with wilders

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 2 months ago, 4 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,285,920

Update - parlement has returned from their well deserved holiday and new talks have started

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) triple-posted this 2 months ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,143

Wilders is threatening with a labour led cabinet

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,159

Some very, very nice progress here... I think we're well on our way to a formation...

It must not be rushed, of course. Rushed coalitions are how we get trouble. What the Dutch people want is a meticulously crafted coalition that is the best it can be.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,188

@previous (G)
Luckily having a government is important for any reason, so they can just keep taking their time.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 months ago, 52 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,198

@1,286,159 (G)
They want one that has any chance of lasting more than a year

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 1 month ago, 3 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,286,931

Update - the formation has now taken 103 days, which is the average time to form a majority. Thanks.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) triple-posted this 1 month ago, 6 days later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,287,824

Update - No updates

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 days later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,113

Update - Wilders will not become PM!!

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 54 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,114

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Looks like the terrorists win again.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 11 hours later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,288,172

Wilders says it's unfair he's not becoming pm

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 weeks later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,466

Nearly fisticuffs in parlement!

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 54 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,470

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I think that you should get a strong man to lock all these politicians in a room and deny them food and water until they reach an agreement.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 20 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,473

@previous (H)
The fisticuffs were unrelated to the formation! They are related to alleged Russian funding of Forum voor Democratie

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,474

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Oh no, le evil nasty bad man may have given someone free money

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,475

@previous (H)
No the fundee threatened fisticuffs with another member of parlement

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,476

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

You should get a strong man to put the fundee and the funder-haters in a room and deny them food and water until they come to an agreement about how taking money from Russia is good, actually.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,485

@previous (H)
Why

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,487

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Then there will be unity in cause.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 37 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,491

@previous (H)
There would also be unity in cause if they agreed on how taking money from Russia is bad actually

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 month ago, 12 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,492

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
This kind of hater mentality is why entrepreneurship is dead in EUrope.

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,493

@1,290,491 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't see how it is. You are first of all removing wealth from Russia which could otherwise be spent on their war, and secondly that money can be spent on the public good.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 17 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,579

@previous (H)
You don't see how it would be unity in cause?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 1 month ago, 16 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,580

@1,290,492 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What about Enshrouded

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 10 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,695

@1,290,579 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't see how it is bad, actually.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 15 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,785

@previous (H)
Do you see yourself threatening fisticuffs to someone who did see how it is bad

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 5 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,805

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I think that anybody would eventually agree that it is good, if you hired a strong man to lock them in a room and deny them food and water until they did.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,806

@previous (H)
Do you think this strong men should be hired?

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,809

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't see why not. If he's strong enough to gaol the politicians, he surely must be strong enough to lead the nation.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,820

@previous (H)
Weird opinions

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 38 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,824

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Why do you say that?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,838

@previous (H)
Your posts in this draad

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,839

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

What about them?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 1 day later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,966

@previous (H)
Made me say that

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 14 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,968

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

What about them, specifically, made you say that?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 31 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,972

@previous (H)
Their odd nature obviously

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,290,975

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Could you, perchance, expand upon this? Or are you going to keep forcing me to drag it out from you?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 6 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,009

@previous (H)
Odd, weird, strange, unlike the others, cray-cray.

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,012

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Ah, so you aren't going to actually formulate an opinion. You are instead going to make me reply to you over and over again, asking clarifying questions.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 10 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,038

@previous (H)
I'm simply and humbly enquiring about your opinion, friend!

Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 27 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,039

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

What are you enquiring?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,041

@previous (H)
Your opinion on the Baudet/Klaver kerfuffle of course

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,052

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I think that they should hire a strong man to lock Baudet and Klaver in a room and deny them sustenance until they make up.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,085

@previous (H)
That's one weird opinion, friend!

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,102

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Not at all, the lack of food and water will provide a strong motivation for these squabbling politicians to find common cause.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 35 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,109

@previous (H)
> Not at all
Which part

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,110

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Any of it. Unless you mean the two politicians aren't quibbling, in which case that part.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 49 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,114

@previous (H)
None of it is weird??

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,115

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't think so, although if you do then I welcome you to share your views on why you think so.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,119

@previous (H)
I was hoping for your thoughts on why it's weird. Was not expecting you not to realise why it's odd!

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,123

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't think it's weird at all. Perhaps you could explain.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,131

@previous (H)
You don't think it's weird to lock politicians in a room until they agree that it's best to take money in exchange for taking Russian-favourable stances? That's so odd!

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,148

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> in exchange for taking Russian-favourable stances

You are hallucinating again. I think that you are spending too much time on computers.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 32 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,149

hallucinate...deeze nuts motherfucker!!!

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 18 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,155

@1,291,148 (H)
Oh that was actually what the kerfuffle was about tho?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,156

Well threat of kerfuffle

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,159

@1,291,155 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Nevertheless, they should take the money. The money can be spent on Dutchish interests, and it also removes it from Russian hands.

Anonymous I replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,164

i would vote for whomevers name sounds the most ridiculous, pretty good political stance imo

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 6 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,193

@1,291,159 (H)
Odd

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,207

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Not at all, I believe in the old adage that "Money has no smell". In other words, regardless of the origin of the money, it is beneficial to obtain it.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,219

@previous (H)
Beneficial to whom

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,232

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

To the good people of Holland, who will have the money spent on maintaining their roads and funding their leisure centers.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 12 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,304

@previous (H)
i dont think a bribe buys a lot of roads or leisure centres

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,314

Plus what of the compensation

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,350

@1,291,304 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

This depends on the value of the bribe!

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't see any reason to compensate Russia.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 33 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,352

@previous (H)
Otherwise they'd have no reason to bribe Thierry

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,353

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

There seems to be no downside whatsoever to my plan, then.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,356

@previous (H)
How so??

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 10 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,403

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

On one hand, the good people of Holland get lavish amounts of money spent towards their bills. On the other hand, nobody gives Russia anything for it and they eventually stop trying. All in all, the thing that makes the most sense is to accept Russian money and carry on doing what you would do anyway. And hire a strong man to starve the politicians to death.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 20 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,405

@previous (H)
I'm pretty sure that's not how bribes work

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,536

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

So, either Dutchmen get free money, or Russia stops trying to bribe them. There is no loss.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,538

@previous (H)
intriguing if very odd reasoning

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 53 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,551

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

The worst thing is to refuse the money, and also refuse the Russians. Because then you get nothing.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,552

@previous (H)
i will call my representatives thanks

Anonymous H replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,291,563

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Tell them to say to the bribery "I'll see what I can do", then wink. The russian will think something will be done but actually you've just pulled a trick.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 week later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,595

This week they are talking about the asylum crisis

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,600

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

They should just push them back into the sea and let Davy Jones decide their fate.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,614

@previous (H)
Alas that is illegal

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,656

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Not according to the law of the jungle, which is the only law that really matters.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,687

@previous (H)
Maybe where you live

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,707

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Even where you live!

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 39 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,714

@previous (H)
No we have regular law

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,719

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

False law, weak law, artificial law, a law easily ignored or circumvented.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,720

@previous (H)
Again with the weirdness

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,722

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I don't understand you.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,729

@previous (H)
That's odd

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,730

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Why is that?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,776

Update: Wilders has retweeted someone calling for new elections

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,784

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Call new elections tomorrow, send everyone a QR code wristband in the mail and they scan it to vote online.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,830

@previous (H)
So what does the qr code accomplish

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,837

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Can't vote twice or fraudulently

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,855

@previous (H)
Why not just send them a unique URL? Accomplishes the same thing.

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,870

@previous (J)

Because we live in the future, and you can't use a unique URL as a funky fashion accessory.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,899

@1,292,837 (H)
Because a qr code on a wristband?

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,292,904

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Yes!

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 2 days later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,190

Timmermans is getting antsy as we enter week 22

Anonymous H replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,192

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

What about?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 3 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,205

@previous (H)
His turn

Anonymous H replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,214

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

Forming a government?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 6 days ago, 5 days later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,912

Dieuwertje Blok's nose is getting amputated

Anonymous H replied with this 5 days ago, 57 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,914

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

For crimes?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw (OP) replied with this 5 days ago, 5 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,916

@previous (H)
No skin cancer

Anonymous H replied with this 5 days ago, 25 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^] [v] #1,293,919

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

I didn't know the Dutch punished people for having skin cancer
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.