SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,328
@209,323 (grey !C.MxxuCiTo) @previous (B) > petition asking government to take away benefits from rioters > government deciding whether to take away benefits from rioters
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,332
@previous (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
Well, how does it do anything to prevent future riots? It doesn't, it's just a way of punishing people.
All i can see this doing is causing more people to resort to violent crime to survive, and since their government isn't helping them in any way when they cut them off from receiving benefits, who will they be angry at? Yup, they're going to be pissed at the Government!
inb4 massive riots by the army of poverty stricken chavs that is being created.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,335
@previous (brie !OudrPWaUDQ)
but i dont think that they shouldn't get punished just because the government is scared of them rioting again.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,337
> > government deciding whether to take away benefits from rioters
> Magistrates and crown court judges could be asked to dock benefits from convicted criminals > Number 10 is actively looking at the withdrawal of child maintenance or child benefit from parents who allow children to truant, or repeatedly allow them to stay on the streets late at night.
> No mention of rioters "loosing" all their benefits
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,341
@209,335 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.) > criminal class starts to riot because they are poor and angry > derp, let's make them even poorer and angrier! this plan is perfect!
I dunno man, but i guess we'll see how this turns out.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,343
@209,337 (B) > Magistrates and crown court judges could be asked to dock benefits from convicted criminals under preliminary proposals being drawn up by the government in response to the riots, the Guardian can reveal.
> Some councils have announced plans to evict families of convicted rioters from social housing.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,345
@209,341 (brie !OudrPWaUDQ)
yeah, i suppose you're right. i still think thy need more of a punishment than just a few weeks/ months in prison though.
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,347
@209,343 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
See, they are even planning on punishing people who weren't even directly involved in committing a crime.
How is that a fair punishment? They seem to want to scare people away from rising up, but in a fucked up manner which will likely just cause more rioting.
If you take everything away from these people, what will they be scared of losing?
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^][v]#209,353