Minichan

Topic: "the Biden-Harris administration"

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #116,189

I don't remember seeing the VP's name listed as frequently for past presidencies.

You wouldn't often read anyone saying "the Trump-Pence administration" or the "Obama-Biden administration" passed this or that bill, or is supporting this or that initiative. At most you'd hear the VP's name during elections and then never hear from or about them again for the whole duration they were in office.

Harris has been consistently less popular than Biden, so this just seems like a transparent attempt to promote her and shoehorn her into being president if Biden drops despite what the public polls have been saying. Maybe if they keep putting her name everywhere people will suddenly forget everything they know about her!

I remember back when they tried to push Hillary despite her having lower odds than another Democratic candidate who had much broader public support, and, well, we all saw how that went. I wish history would stop repeating itself.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,283,384

You hear it all the time, you fora-hikikomora.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,385

The VP matters more when the Prez is in his 80s.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,389

@1,283,384 (B)
I never heard people refer to the "Trump-Pence administration" or the "Obama-Biden administration" beyond the election cycle.

I was curious to see if I was remembering wrong and looked around whitehouse.gov, of course now, everywhere it says the "Biden-Harris administration". So I then checked on the wayback archive and, sure enough, it was just the "Trump administration", the "Obama administration", or the "Bush administration".

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,390

@previous (A)
I hear/heard Clinton-Gore all the time.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,392

@1,283,385 (C)
Yeah, I know why they're doing it, as I said in the OP. It's so transparent it's insulting.

What I don't know is why they're insisting on her when there's a long list of others that the public would more reliably support.

Seems like the Hillary catastrophe all over again. Maybe if the Democratic party would start, you know, actually listening to what people want, they could more reliably win elections.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 12 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,393

@1,283,390 (B)
Good for you.

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 18 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,394

@1,283,390 (B)
You sound like you're almost 50.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,399

@previous (C)
I'm not. You?

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,411

@previous (B)
Who do you think you're talking to? lol

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,417

@previous (C)
Some fudge packing faggot

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,430

@previous (B)
Why do you obsess over fudge packers? Perhaps this type of activity is eminently relevant to your plans?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,435

@1,283,417 (B)
heh

theres nothing stopping us from supporting williamson or a bernie write in
except stupidity and laziness

@previous (C)
only if girlies are involved
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.