Topic: Would you let these images pass peer review, fora?
tteh !MemesToDNA started this discussion 2 years ago #116,156
Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathwayhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390/full
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 11 seconds later[^] [v] #1,283,103
tteh !MemesToDNA (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,104
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,105
Giant mouse COCK
tteh !MemesToDNA (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,106
🤔Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,107
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
With this notice, Frontiers states its awareness of concerns regarding the article "Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway" published on 13 February 2024. An investigation is currently being conducted and this notice will be updated accordingly after the investigation concludes.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,108
I have no reason to suspect the image isn't illustrative of the actual process, so my only concern lies with the rat.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,109
Is this a "real" journal or one of those ones where any retard can submit a paper?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,110
Looks fine to me.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,130
the cherry angiomas on his balls are blue
so blueberry angiomas?
so blueberry angiomas?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 52 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,134
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,227
Yes if I were a scientist I would see no reason to doubt the accuracy of these images. I would approve.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,232
The first one fooled me for a little while
tteh !MemesToDNA (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,237
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,239
@1,283,106 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Binsilla has had one review ever, the AI one, and Jingbo no longer has an account at all.
Binsilla has had one review ever, the AI one, and Jingbo no longer has an account at all.
tteh !MemesToDNA (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,241
A Retraction of the Review article “Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway”
Guo X, Dong L and Hao D (2024), Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:1339390. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390
Following publication, concerns were raised regarding the nature of its AI-generated figures. The article does not meet the standards of editorial and scientific rigor for Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology; therefore, the article has been retracted.
This retraction was approved by the Chief Executive Editor of Frontiers. Frontiers would like to thank the concerned readers who contacted us regarding the published article.
Guo X, Dong L and Hao D (2024), Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:1339390. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390
Following publication, concerns were raised regarding the nature of its AI-generated figures. The article does not meet the standards of editorial and scientific rigor for Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology; therefore, the article has been retracted.
This retraction was approved by the Chief Executive Editor of Frontiers. Frontiers would like to thank the concerned readers who contacted us regarding the published article.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,268
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
We can't publish journal articles with AI-generated figures and text now? Fucking bullshit.
We can't publish journal articles with AI-generated figures and text now? Fucking bullshit.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,270
@1,283,237 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> I mean, they did correctly label "Rat". I do wonder about "dck" though.
Self-censorship. "dick" would've been obscene. "d*ck" would've seemed obscene. "dck"? Just right.
> I mean, they did correctly label "Rat". I do wonder about "dck" though.
Self-censorship. "dick" would've been obscene. "d*ck" would've seemed obscene. "dck"? Just right.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,283,294
prom