Topic: New type of blood clots found.
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,985
So we now have a new type of heart disease to deal with. Discuss.Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,281,466
They don't call it the clot shot for nothing!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,469
Hahaha. Good.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 37 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,470
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,487
Coming to an artery near you.Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,490
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,492
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,506
Fun fact: in addition to blood clots like what OP is talking you can also get sudden clotting due to plaques breaking off from the walls of your arteries.These plaques are made from the same material as normal pus on the surface of your skin. Whole different class of popping videos there.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,508
@previous (C)
I'm not saying your full of it. But that looks like the skin off a baked chicken wing lol
I'm not saying your full of it. But that looks like the skin off a baked chicken wing lol
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,509
@previous (A)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheroma
It's real, believe it or not. This is why people get stents. Unlike pus on the skin, this stuff can often be calcified.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheroma
It's real, believe it or not. This is why people get stents. Unlike pus on the skin, this stuff can often be calcified.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,513
What is the new type of clot called?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,514
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,516
@1,281,513 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Don't know. I don't think they have got a name for it yet. There isn't a lot of information on it that I could find. Only a couple of doctors talking about it. From what I gathered they weren't saying that all clots were the cause of deaths. These photos were taken from autopsies.
Don't know. I don't think they have got a name for it yet. There isn't a lot of information on it that I could find. Only a couple of doctors talking about it. From what I gathered they weren't saying that all clots were the cause of deaths. These photos were taken from autopsies.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,519
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,531
but that's not blood
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,533
So it seems these may be post mortem clots and are not new
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,535
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's a new type of clot formed via a different pathway than the typical prothrombin activation.
It's a new type of clot formed via a different pathway than the typical prothrombin activation.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,537
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,538
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 40 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,539
@1,281,533 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The place I found them has been taken down. Here is a video I found of two doctors discussing them. I haven't watched it yet so not sure what they are saying. https://youtu.be/4rAoqhTUU0g?si=pe78DBv5q7MFI0XV
The place I found them has been taken down. Here is a video I found of two doctors discussing them. I haven't watched it yet so not sure what they are saying. https://youtu.be/4rAoqhTUU0g?si=pe78DBv5q7MFI0XV
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,540
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,541
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,542
@1,281,540 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not seeing it anywhere. I saw a talk on it a little while back. I'd guess they're formally publishing their results now. I haven't seen or sought out any news coverage of it so I don't know if they've identified the exact pathway yet.
Not seeing it anywhere. I saw a talk on it a little while back. I'd guess they're formally publishing their results now. I haven't seen or sought out any news coverage of it so I don't know if they've identified the exact pathway yet.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,550
@1,281,541 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I just watched that video. This is very disturbing.
What is on twitter?
I just watched that video. This is very disturbing.
What is on twitter?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,551
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,553
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,554
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,563
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,565
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,572
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,573
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,574
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,575
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,576
@1,281,574 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Was what you saw trying to tie it vaccines? I looked at the comments of the YT video OP posted and I started to get that sense. For what it's worth the talk I saw was only pointing out that the particular pt they were studying with this type of clotting had test results (PTT) indicating that the normal clotting mechanisms weren't at work at all.
Was what you saw trying to tie it vaccines? I looked at the comments of the YT video OP posted and I started to get that sense. For what it's worth the talk I saw was only pointing out that the particular pt they were studying with this type of clotting had test results (PTT) indicating that the normal clotting mechanisms weren't at work at all.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 44 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,577
@1,281,575 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That is a different post than the one I saw on fB. Did you watch that discussion video I put up? I think they were trying to say it may have been the virus causing the strange clots, not the vax.
That is a different post than the one I saw on fB. Did you watch that discussion video I put up? I think they were trying to say it may have been the virus causing the strange clots, not the vax.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,578
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,281,579
I'm pretty sure the talk I saw was before the COVID vaccine. But I can't say for certain. It was several years ago now.