Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: "Hacker Group Anonymous Vows To Destroy Facebook On November 5"

Falco !PZmcClOUDk started this discussion 15 years ago #11,593

lol, 15 year old boys haet bookface


http://www.businessinsider.com/anonymous-facebook-2011-8

Also:
> UPDATE: Anonymous leadership disowned Operation Facebook on Twitter.

> Leadership
> Twitter
> Disown


I died of laughter when I saw that. This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say Anonymous has been fucking dead for half a decade.

(Edited 33 seconds later.)

hamfist !!snnYcROO9 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #208,692

oh ok

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,707

> Anonymous leadership
> Twitter
> Disown Operation

Oh my god.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,713

@previous (C)
Seriously. -_-

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,714

@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)

r04r joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #208,777

@OP
The news has been all about anonymous like that here for the past few months. It's been bugging me that they keep misreporting on that idiocy, making it seem more elite and super-awesome-hacker-like than it is as wel.

The Editor !FuckWtfW8M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #208,782

@previous (r04r)
It's what keeps the people coming back for more. The public isn't going to want to follow the misadventures of a bunch of bored teenagers with ADD and a computer.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #208,784

@208,777 (r04r)
yeah my family talked about it at dinner

FatGreen joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #208,785

Image went missing@208,782 (The Editor !FuckWtfW8M)

The Editor !FuckWtfW8M replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #208,801

@previous (FatGreen)

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #208,803

If, in the midst of the London riots, some newspaper had reported: "Hooligan leadership disowns plans to loot shops on Twitter!" it would have sounded ridiculous.

Dear Press,
Please stop pretending some bored teenagers and college students are some vast, underground crime family or Illuminati-style conspiracy.

sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #208,923

Its still funny to me whenever there is an anonymous news story.

Remember that fox report on the kid who was being targetted by anonymous because he "tried to shut them down."

I think he basically white knighted so someone doxed him. He was just getting death threats (unserious, obviously) and pizzas. It was hilarious. The mother was very afraid of this anonymous group.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #209,017

Its funny how the Mainstream Media treats anonymous like they are some organized group of terrorists.

orc !WBRXcNtpf. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #209,021

Image went missing> You are not safe from them nor from any government. One day you will look back on this and realise what we have done here is right, you will thank the rulers of the internet, we are not harming you but saving you.
> The riots are underway. It is not a battle over the future of privacy and publicity. It is a battle for choice and informed consent.

maybe they wouldn't make this group out to be so big if they didn't write like they were trying to be some kind of underground crime family or illuminati-style conspiracy.. everyone is just embarrassing themselves :c

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #209,114

@208,803 (I)
The press pretends this is the case to affect the outcome their ownership desires: Public support for increasing attacks on privacy, especially anonymity.

dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #209,116

lol

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #209,130

Image went missing@208,923 (sluggy)

> I think he basically white knighted so someone doxed him.

The guy from that video was Alex Wuori. His girlfriend left him so he asked 7chan to raid her, but got told NYPA, and started shitpostinguntil someone who went to his school released his dox, so his myspace was hacked and gay sex put on it and pizza time was had at his house. Then 7chan died and he claimed on #420 to have shut it down, and threatened to have 420chan shut down as well, causing everybody to start with the prank phone calls.

Then he sabotaged a Perverted Justice raid and took credit for the 2007 chanpocalypse, and psoted Kirtaner's dox on a terrorist forum.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #209,163

I hate everything about this.
-actual Anonymous

sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 5 days later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #212,958

@209,130 (C)
What a tool.

Anonymous M replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #212,961

@209,021 (orc !WBRXcNtpf.)
Except the real Illuminati has infiltrated the real Anonymous. These "attacks" by anonymous are deliberately meant to cultivate political support for increasing anti-privacy legislation.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #212,968

@previous (M)
and yet theres not a damn they can do about it; their efforts only make my penis hard.

Anonymous M replied with this 15 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #213,384

@previous (Q)
It's the twin towers all over again.

Step 1: Consort with the enemy and learn their plans.
Step 2: Rig the game so your enemy will have great success.
Step 3: Allow your enemy to take credit for this success.
Step 4: Propose politically unpopular "solutions" while clueless public is scarred stupid.
Step 5: PROFIT!

JULAY replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #213,480

@previous (M)
funnay thang though, there will always be ways to go anonymous; don't matter how many laws they manage to passs

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #213,486

leejun

Anonymous M replied with this 15 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #213,685

@213,480 (JULAY)
Anonymous from other people yes. Anonymous from the government I'm not so sure.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.