Topic: I had an idea for an amateur film project
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #11,584
And I'd like to know if any of you think it sounds interestingBasically, what I want to do is barricade myself in a room or cabin or shed for 200 days with an extremely limited selection of entertainment (I'm thinking perhaps a pencil and 200 sheets of a4 and maybe a novella) and no contact with anybody.
It would then be marketed as a fictional 'mockumentary'. Working title is Solitude.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #208,495
No mockumentary. Give yourself plenty of paper and scissors and glue and writing instruments. See what you create. For the novella, may I recommend I am Legend. Hopefully, you'll just go insane.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,497
How would it be made interesting? I mean, somethings gotta happen, there has to be some reason to watch it. Two hours of someone sitting in a room sounds rather boring.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,501
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
I came up with the idea after I spent 6 days in complete isolation recently. I was talking to myself, yelling at inanimate objects when they weren't being "good enough", acting like a fool, etc... and that was with TV and Internet to play around on. 200 days would most likely show a slow descent into insanity that would take ages to shake off.
If you want to see what it's like, try it yourself, for just 48 hours. Lock yourself in somewhere with plenty of food and a book. Then imagine doing that for 100x longer.
I came up with the idea after I spent 6 days in complete isolation recently. I was talking to myself, yelling at inanimate objects when they weren't being "good enough", acting like a fool, etc... and that was with TV and Internet to play around on. 200 days would most likely show a slow descent into insanity that would take ages to shake off.
If you want to see what it's like, try it yourself, for just 48 hours. Lock yourself in somewhere with plenty of food and a book. Then imagine doing that for 100x longer.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,504
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,507
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,509
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,516
Sounds fucking retarded. Just saying.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,517
@208,509 (D)
Where did I say I did? The only reference to insanity I've made so far is this:
> 200 days would most likely show a slow descent into insanity that would take ages to shake off.
Where did I say I did? The only reference to insanity I've made so far is this:
> 200 days would most likely show a slow descent into insanity that would take ages to shake off.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,518
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,520
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,522
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,523
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 54 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,526
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,527
@208,523 (E)
No, it's because of two things.
1. You type like he does.
2. Toastr is posting in the toastr thread about drugs right now, and you seem to make replies ITT either 20-30 seconds before or after toastr does in his thread.
No, it's because of two things.
1. You type like he does.
2. Toastr is posting in the toastr thread about drugs right now, and you seem to make replies ITT either 20-30 seconds before or after toastr does in his thread.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,528
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #208,532
t04str accusations are getting soooo old. I don't even care if it's t04str anymore lol, pretty sure some posters try to get 'sup toastr' reactions.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #208,591
@208,517 (A)
> I came up with the idea after I spent 6 days in complete isolation recently. I was talking to myself, yelling at inanimate objects when they weren't being "good enough", acting like a fool, etc... and that was with TV and Internet to play around on.
> I came up with the idea after I spent 6 days in complete isolation recently. I was talking to myself, yelling at inanimate objects when they weren't being "good enough", acting like a fool, etc... and that was with TV and Internet to play around on.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)