Topic: White House Calls Explicit AI Generated Taylor Swift Images Alluring - Urges Congress To Get More
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,693
httрs://www.foxnews.com/media/white-house-calls-explicit-ai-generated-taylor-swift-images-alluring-urges-congress-to-get-more
As a huge fan of hers, it's really tough to see her privacy being violated like this with those AI-generated nudes. I mean, she's such an amazing artist and always handles difficult situations so gracefully. It's not just about her music though, I think we should respect her personal life and privacy, just like we would for anyone else. Privacy is a basic right that everyone deserves, regardless of how famous they are.
I can't imagine how this must be affecting her emotionally. We really need to show our support by respecting her boundaries and privacy. And it's not just about her, it's about personal privacy in general. This scandal should make us think about how to protect our own privacy in this ever-advancing technological world. Let's stand with Taylor and make a change in how we handle privacy, both in the lives of celebrities and our own.
As a huge fan of hers, it's really tough to see her privacy being violated like this with those AI-generated nudes. I mean, she's such an amazing artist and always handles difficult situations so gracefully. It's not just about her music though, I think we should respect her personal life and privacy, just like we would for anyone else. Privacy is a basic right that everyone deserves, regardless of how famous they are.
I can't imagine how this must be affecting her emotionally. We really need to show our support by respecting her boundaries and privacy. And it's not just about her, it's about personal privacy in general. This scandal should make us think about how to protect our own privacy in this ever-advancing technological world. Let's stand with Taylor and make a change in how we handle privacy, both in the lives of celebrities and our own.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,278,037
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,039
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,040
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,041
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,042
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,043
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,044
and do you have the black american putin?Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,047
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,050
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,052
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,056
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,061
> The group added, "SAG-AFTRA continues to support legislation by Congressman Joe Morelle, the Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act, to make sure we stop exploitation of this nature from happening again.
hahaha. oh wow.
hahaha. oh wow.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,062
@previous (C)
They don't understand P2P, open source models, or anything else about the technology.
NYT is suing to ban chatgpt, and artists are suing midjourney and stablediffusion.
The union used leverage to work that into the contracts, and it will only hurt the studios that employ them while google and pornhub reap the revenues from streaming.
They don't understand P2P, open source models, or anything else about the technology.
NYT is suing to ban chatgpt, and artists are suing midjourney and stablediffusion.
The union used leverage to work that into the contracts, and it will only hurt the studios that employ them while google and pornhub reap the revenues from streaming.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,119
The real lesson here is that if something bad is happening to millions of Americans and congress refuses to act, just do it to Taylor Swift and they will pass a new law the next day
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,142
@1,278,062 (A)
It's a story as old as time: something new comes along and instead of learning to live and benefit with it, people refuse and immediately respond by attempting to ban it.
It's a story as old as time: something new comes along and instead of learning to live and benefit with it, people refuse and immediately respond by attempting to ban it.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,144
if you're a pubic figure than you have to expect this
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 52 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,163
> The Department of Justice launched the first national 24/7 helpline for survivors of image-based sexual abuse.
"Hello? Yes. Someone posted something online that I don't like. Send the police!"
"Hello? Yes. Someone posted something online that I don't like. Send the police!"
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,197
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,200
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,204
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,207
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,208
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Looks perfectly healthy.
Not trying to be mean, but from what you've revealed about yourself and your personal life, there are serious open questions about your ability to identify what a woman even is, much less if one is deformed or not.
Looks perfectly healthy.
Not trying to be mean, but from what you've revealed about yourself and your personal life, there are serious open questions about your ability to identify what a woman even is, much less if one is deformed or not.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,209
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,210
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Learn what a woman is first. Then you can worry about whether or not one is deformed.
Learn what a woman is first. Then you can worry about whether or not one is deformed.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,211
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,212
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,215
@1,278,208 (C)
> Looks perfectly healthy.
>
> Not trying to be mean, but from what you've revealed about yourself and your personal life, there are serious open questions about your ability to identify what a woman even is, much less if one is deformed or not.
Lol
> Looks perfectly healthy.
>
> Not trying to be mean, but from what you've revealed about yourself and your personal life, there are serious open questions about your ability to identify what a woman even is, much less if one is deformed or not.
Lol
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,216
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,218
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,222
@previous (C)
Seems like you're projecting
Also your recent posts make you look so calm and rational. Fucking loser
Seems like you're projecting
Also your recent posts make you look so calm and rational. Fucking loser
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,228
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
An insult three posts in a row. Nope, definitely not upset!
An insult three posts in a row. Nope, definitely not upset!
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,236
@previous (C)
You spend day after day begging for my attention because I pissed you off
But you're definitely not emotional!
You spend day after day begging for my attention because I pissed you off
But you're definitely not emotional!
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,239
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,243
@previous (C)
Ah you are the imaginary Walt poster, how cute
Give me attention kook, suck suck suck suck
Ah you are the imaginary Walt poster, how cute
Give me attention kook, suck suck suck suck
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,245
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,247
@previous (C)
Is it an insult to bring up that you faked a conversation with Walter because you crave negative attention? To me it's a descriptor of events
Is it an insult to bring up that you faked a conversation with Walter because you crave negative attention? To me it's a descriptor of events
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,250
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Alright, five it is then!
Weird how you're trying to engage me in conversation again when I stopped talking and started counting. Asking me questions, even! But you're also simultaneously claiming I'm the one craving your attention? 🤡
Alright, five it is then!
Weird how you're trying to engage me in conversation again when I stopped talking and started counting. Asking me questions, even! But you're also simultaneously claiming I'm the one craving your attention? 🤡
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,252
@previous (C)
Saying you made up a fake walter isn't an insult. It's the hilarious truth, and very weird behavior
How many posts have you made about me? How many times have you tries to catch my attention this week? I'll bet its a lot Kek
Saying you made up a fake walter isn't an insult. It's the hilarious truth, and very weird behavior
How many posts have you made about me? How many times have you tries to catch my attention this week? I'll bet its a lot Kek
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,255
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You're taking quite an interest in me! You sound obsessed!
See how stupid that is? That's what you're doing. But not only: you also can't ever let go of a conversation, which makes you sound all the more crazy.
You spend a lot of time trying to attack the character of anyone that disagrees with you. I don't want to make assumptions here, but I often see that type of thing when someone can't attack the arguments themself. So they instead shoot the messenger. Or they pretend to not care about the message itself. It's almost like trying to convince others of what you yourself cannot be convinced of.
You're taking quite an interest in me! You sound obsessed!
See how stupid that is? That's what you're doing. But not only: you also can't ever let go of a conversation, which makes you sound all the more crazy.
You spend a lot of time trying to attack the character of anyone that disagrees with you. I don't want to make assumptions here, but I often see that type of thing when someone can't attack the arguments themself. So they instead shoot the messenger. Or they pretend to not care about the message itself. It's almost like trying to convince others of what you yourself cannot be convinced of.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,259
@previous (C)
You follow me around bear bear. What else needs to be said?
I've bothered you enough that you can't stop. I love the internet so much
You follow me around bear bear. What else needs to be said?
I've bothered you enough that you can't stop. I love the internet so much
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,278
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,281
@1,278,211 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The people who obsess over genital body modifications aren't the coomers, but the people who are concerned by it are? 🤔
The people who obsess over genital body modifications aren't the coomers, but the people who are concerned by it are? 🤔
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,284
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,285
@previous (B)
I gnawed off my own arm, but you looked disturbed by the whole activity so you're the real creep.
I gnawed off my own arm, but you looked disturbed by the whole activity so you're the real creep.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,286
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,289
@previous (B)
What if I insisted I was a snake, and the government and corporate bosses demanded you affirm my beliefs?
What if I insisted I was a snake, and the government and corporate bosses demanded you affirm my beliefs?