Minichan

Topic: New evidence proves that Alfred Hitchcock was trans

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,691

His real name was Alfred Hidescock.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,278,018

The unabomber was trans. Kook called it years ago when she said it's no coincidence that all trans people have mental health issues. Especially if dysphoria is required to be considered trans. Trans genderism IS a mental disorder. Really that simple.

> For a period of several weeks in 1966, Kaczynski experienced intense sexual fantasies of being female and decided to undergo gender transition. He arranged to meet with a psychiatrist but changed his mind in the waiting room and discussed other things instead, without disclosing his original reason for making the appointment. Afterwards, enraged, he considered killing the psychiatrist and other people whom he hated. Kaczynski described this episode as a "major turning point" in his life.[32][33] He recalled: "I felt disgusted about what my uncontrolled sexual cravings had almost led me to do. And I felt humiliated, and I violently hated the psychiatrist. Just then there came a major turning point in my life. Like a Phoenix, I burst from the ashes of my despair to a glorious new hope."[34]

Like Phoenix the Bird!

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,031

@previous (B)
Could he have been targeted for the ideology?

It's already confirmed that MKULTRA wanted him to write out his entire philosophy. Maybe they used experimental tricks to see if they could make him do crazy things. Convincing someone turn gay and chop their own dick off would be strong evidence that LSD or their chemical of choice for that experiment was an effective tool.

You start off trying 20 pharmaceutical products on johns, and once you have enough data that one stands out you move on to using it to reprogram someone in the upper strata, especially people who seem cognitively fit. Transing a leading mathematician would be a demonstration of how powerful the chem was. Since he applied to Berkeley he would be politically acceptable to target for the boys back in Virginia.

Kook has already transed 2 people that post here, confirmed. There could be others that don't say anything, and we know nothing of how many people she's done this to in person. She could work for the company, even indirectly, using the methods they developed in the 60s.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,032

@1,278,018 (B)
@previous (C)
Kook is a male. Please use proper pronoun. Thanks.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,058

@1,278,031 (C)
What's been interesting to me is the drop in testosterone levels, sperm counts, egg quality and fertility levels of both males and females not only in humans but across multiple species - especially those in the most contact with humans. Combine this with the rise in obesity levels over similar periods, also across species (even in calorie controlled lab animals) and one has to wonder what's going on. It's already known that BPAs serve as endocrine disrupters, but what about the other multiple thousands of polymers pumped out of the ground that we not only use to encase much of our water and food, but also burn into the air for good measure?

It's such good fortune that we live in a world where, despite knowing all this, it's impossible that the rise in transgenderism could be related to any of it. Even raising the possibility is preposterous! Because if there were a link, perhaps several multi-billion dollar industries might be at risk. And that would be no good.

It's doubly fortunate that the political arm that typically concerns itself with environmental protections is completely unconcerned with these issues. And the arm that's concerned with these issues is completely unconcerned about environmental protections!

It kind of reminds me of the "controversy" that existed about removing lead from gasoline, although that almost lends the present situation too much dignity.

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,083

@previous (B)
Do you have a big cock?

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,085

@previous (C)
Does anyone?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,095

@1,278,058 (B)
bruh slow down 🌲, plastix pollution is an issue and cuntservatives opposing it with courts and less funding is why we havent banned all these plastics probably.
why they dont agree idk, too stupid? selfish want to profit off pollution and letting ppl free to pollute?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,097

Alfred NIGGERcock.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,106

@1,278,031 (C)
God you're a weirdo

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,108

@1,278,058 (B)

I remember freaking out about this exact thing when I was 16. What was fucked up was how the idea of it turned me on, it was kinda a fantasy long before I found out about the issue, now the fantasy seemed like it was happening without my consent.

Anyways, later I found out that it doesn't work like imagined. A psychotic doctor called John Money convinced a family to remove the damaged penis of their baby boy and raise him as a girl instead, that baby boy eventually transitioned back. Also newer investigation reveals our dicks are getting bigger with newer generations and reduced semen findings are the result of porn which makes us masturbate more.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,112

@previous (I)
I feel like porn is much more addictive and harmful than people are willing to admit

Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,117

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

Yeah people neglect to see the effects. People think it's a moral discussion, but for me, the problem is societal. If I discovered porn much younger and in the accessible form it is in now? I think I would have spent much less time growing somewhat upwards and instead just watch porn.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,143

@1,278,108 (I)
Sounds like a singular anecdote. Not sure about what you're saying about sperm counts but it doesn't matter. Measures of sperm quality and motlity are also down. That's not a known effect of masturbation.

You also haven't explained the lowering of testosterone levels and female fertility measures as well. Masturbation does not lower testosterone levels. Countless studies have confirmed this. And they've done countless studies because there's a lot of money to be made in sports.

Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 47 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,160

@previous (B)

I bet our diets have a big part in all of this as well. It's known that being overweight lowers testosterone, at least I've heard it couple of times. Our diets are the real villains here.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,162

@previous (I)
Calorie controlled lab animals are also becoming overweight. Their diets have not changed. Don't confuse an effect with a cause.

Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,169

@previous (B)

Oh, I wasn't aware of calorie controlled lab animals are also becoming overweight. It's just obvious to me, you would be amazed at how shitty food effects us.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,171

@previous (I)
I doubt shitty food is to blame much or at all here since, again, nutritionally controlled lab animals are gaining weight despite being given the same food pellet formulations in the same controlled amounts for many decades.

The argument could even be made, and I'm not going to so with any seriousness, that our diets have actually gotten better in recent years. Everything is fortified with vitamins and minerals these days. There are some nutritional deficiencies that do not exist almost ever in the developed world any more, despite being quite common not long ago.

I also saw a study that suggested that while people are exercising less often than they used to (and again, one must ask is this really a cause or an effect of another problem to begin with), people are gaining weight far faster than what would be expected from inactivity and calorie intake alone.

Why are gorillas and most other non-human primates so strong despite never picking up a dumbbell? Hormones.

Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,174

@1,278,095 (F)
Nice partisan reply. Thanks for being part of the problem.

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,176

@1,278,171 (B)

Yeah I don't doubt that this is not the case with the lab rats, I trust you on that, but when we talk about people it's very different to me. Children have gotten liver disease from consuming too much sugar, our diets might not make us famished but it can sure make us die way faster.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,178

@previous (I)
You're being quite reasonable here, and I thank you for that. I don't know if we'll come to an agreement here on what exactly is going on. I don't claim to know myself. I just have my suspicions. Some of them are from studies I've read and probably since forgotten, but what remains from it is my general hunches.

The fact that we may disagree, if we even do, I don't know, isn't all that important in my mind at least. Being willing and able to question what's going on to me is the important thing. It's such a non-starter for many people these days and I think that's the biggest problem our society faces. The truth will come out eventually. But it's going to take a whole hell of a lot longer if we aren't even trying to find it. Or worse, trying to ignore it.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.