Topic: FAO: Kook
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,653
Because men commit the vast majority of violent crime, it is natural to conclude that there must be something intrinsically violent about them.
Because black men commit an even greater disproportionate amount of violent crime, it is natural to come up with an endless list of possible alternative explanations and to conclude that nothing could ever be concluded about their intrinsic nature.
And we don't need statistics one way or another to know Muslim men are rapists. No need to waste our time.
Did I get that right?
Because black men commit an even greater disproportionate amount of violent crime, it is natural to come up with an endless list of possible alternative explanations and to conclude that nothing could ever be concluded about their intrinsic nature.
And we don't need statistics one way or another to know Muslim men are rapists. No need to waste our time.
Did I get that right?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later[^] [v] #1,277,620
Men commit the vast majority of all violent crime in every country and always have
Are they intrinsically violent?
Are they intrinsically violent?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,627
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,628
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,629
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Of course not. Nothing can ever be concluded about their intrinsic nature.
Of course not. Nothing can ever be concluded about their intrinsic nature.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 38 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,630
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,632
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 31 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,633
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,634
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,639
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Of course not. Nothing can ever be concluded about their intrinsic nature.
Of course not. Nothing can ever be concluded about their intrinsic nature.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,642
Black people actually can't have any distinctive traits of their own. They are merely featureless mirrors onto which we project our white biases. Did I get that right?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,643
@1,277,639 (A)
The majority of all crimes in Liechtenstein and Monaco are committed by white people. I guess white people are inherently violent criminals.
The majority of all crimes in Liechtenstein and Monaco are committed by white people. I guess white people are inherently violent criminals.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,644
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,645
You should make a YouTube video about this thread
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,646
@1,277,643 (D)
That's right. If it's necessary for our goal, we should also purposely confuse or ignore basic statistical concepts, like proportions vs. raw counts.
That's right. If it's necessary for our goal, we should also purposely confuse or ignore basic statistical concepts, like proportions vs. raw counts.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,647
@1,277,644 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Black people actually can't have any distinctive traits of their own. They are merely featureless mirrors onto which we project our white biases. Did I get that right?
Black people actually can't have any distinctive traits of their own. They are merely featureless mirrors onto which we project our white biases. Did I get that right?
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,648
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,649
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,650
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,656
@1,277,649 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)Exactly. Endless reasons for why we can't make any conclusions.
What's most funny to me is how predictable you are. Not a word about my comment about Muslims. A comment about men, but only to go further than what I had even said. Endless pushback about any statement at all about black people.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,657
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,659
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,662
@1,277,656 (A)
Because your premise was incorrect from the beginning
Black people don't commit the vast majority of violent crime in every country, but men do
Because your premise was incorrect from the beginning
Black people don't commit the vast majority of violent crime in every country, but men do
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,687
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's right. If it's necessary for our goal, we should also purposely confuse or ignore basic statistical concepts, like proportions vs. raw counts.
That's right. If it's necessary for our goal, we should also purposely confuse or ignore basic statistical concepts, like proportions vs. raw counts.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,693
@previous (A)
Which of those disproves that men commit the vast majority of all violent crime in every country?
Which of those disproves that men commit the vast majority of all violent crime in every country?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,760
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,780
@1,277,643 (D)
Dumb, that would only make sense if OP pointed out blacks were the majority of criminals in Nigeria or Kenya.
Why are multiethnic countries facing more criminality with their black populations?
The majority population committing the majority of crimes isn't news. A disproportionate ratio is.
@previous (D)
It was a dumb point. Understand the difference between absolute and proportional data.
Dumb, that would only make sense if OP pointed out blacks were the majority of criminals in Nigeria or Kenya.
Why are multiethnic countries facing more criminality with their black populations?
The majority population committing the majority of crimes isn't news. A disproportionate ratio is.
@previous (D)
It was a dumb point. Understand the difference between absolute and proportional data.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 8 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,833
@1,277,627 (A)
There is no point in arguing with somebody about this who thinks that the reason black men are over-represented in the prison populations is because society is fundamentally racist.
(It isn't. It's just a statistic that the majority of violent crimes are committed by black men. Just as the majority of rapes (at least in Europe) are committed by middle eastern men. Like it or not, that's just the way things are.
There is no point in arguing with somebody about this who thinks that the reason black men are over-represented in the prison populations is because society is fundamentally racist.
(It isn't. It's just a statistic that the majority of violent crimes are committed by black men. Just as the majority of rapes (at least in Europe) are committed by middle eastern men. Like it or not, that's just the way things are.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,846
@1,277,644 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
what are you saying about crime? that men have it tougher and this leads them to act out? cause thatd be a logical thing.
its hard to have black crime without many black people. do they commit a vastly larger proportion by population in every country? may be they do.
what are you saying about crime? that men have it tougher and this leads them to act out? cause thatd be a logical thing.
its hard to have black crime without many black people. do they commit a vastly larger proportion by population in every country? may be they do.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,857
Don't forget the direct correlation between poverty and violent crimes committed. And that black people in US are disproportionately impoverished
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,874
@previous (I)
Why would poverty make someone commit random acts of violence or rape another?
Poverty is an understandable motivation for stealing food, or squatting. Those aren't the crimes we are talking about.
Why would poverty make someone commit random acts of violence or rape another?
Poverty is an understandable motivation for stealing food, or squatting. Those aren't the crimes we are talking about.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,883
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,896
@1,277,874 (F)
frustration and lack of funner options. but yr probably so privileged and spoiled u dont know what thise things r like.
@previous (I)
theft of retail is not. its liberation from fascist capitalist price hikes.
frustration and lack of funner options. but yr probably so privileged and spoiled u dont know what thise things r like.
@previous (I)
theft of retail is not. its liberation from fascist capitalist price hikes.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,906
According to the study I linked above, in predominantly black African nations, wealth and crime are *positively* correlated. More wealth, more crime.
It's almost like all the justifications that are used to brush away violent black crime in America are turned against those attempting to use them when you look at Africa.
It's almost like all the justifications that are used to brush away violent black crime in America are turned against those attempting to use them when you look at Africa.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,907
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,908
@1,277,846 (H)
What of both black people and men had higher levels of criminality? What would that mean exactly?
What of both black people and men had higher levels of criminality? What would that mean exactly?
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,923
@1,277,907 (I)
what does that have to do with anything, both understandable
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
idk yr not paying me to be a sociologist
genetics, higher testosterone levels leading to try these things more than others
you didnt my answer my q, what are you saying it says about crime, and wouldnt less privilege be a good reason
what does that have to do with anything, both understandable
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
idk yr not paying me to be a sociologist
genetics, higher testosterone levels leading to try these things more than others
you didnt my answer my q, what are you saying it says about crime, and wouldnt less privilege be a good reason
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,924
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,925
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,928
I wonder if they ever studied if having more balls in general correlates with stuff
Some dudes have anywhere from 0 to 3 balls
Some dudes have anywhere from 0 to 3 balls
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,934
@1,277,925 (I)
what about em dipass
whats yr ideas
@1,277,924 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
imagine thinking the gender that lives longer and unhoused less doesnt have the privilege lol.
u still didnt answer my question
what is the reality of crime and criminals?
no wonder so many anons think yr toxic.
@previous (boof)
who the hell has 3 or 1 ball? lance armstrong? wth
what about em dipass
whats yr ideas
@1,277,924 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
imagine thinking the gender that lives longer and unhoused less doesnt have the privilege lol.
u still didnt answer my question
what is the reality of crime and criminals?
no wonder so many anons think yr toxic.
@previous (boof)
who the hell has 3 or 1 ball? lance armstrong? wth
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,935
@previous (H)
Men have been committing the majority of crime since women were their slaves
Also you have an imaginary friend that you call Walter
Men have been committing the majority of crime since women were their slaves
Also you have an imaginary friend that you call Walter
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,953
@1,277,934 (H)read my first post in this topic to discover the hidden picture
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,963
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,965
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,001
@1,277,935 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Why is it OK to acknowledge discrepancies in criminality for sex/gender, but not race? What makes one appropriate, but wrong for the other?
Why is it OK to acknowledge discrepancies in criminality for sex/gender, but not race? What makes one appropriate, but wrong for the other?
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,278,021
what, doesn't every one hear about it for years? what you talking bout willis
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 year later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,248
But do that tip well?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,253
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 47 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,264
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 1 year ago, 36 seconds later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,266
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,287
boof replied with this 11 months ago, 7 hours later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,363
@previous (L)
implication is that the different identifiable human populations are the way they are because they have undergone captive restricted breeding by another species
so I must ask, what manner of being has been breeding us so cleverly, unseen and unknown to us
implication is that the different identifiable human populations are the way they are because they have undergone captive restricted breeding by another species
so I must ask, what manner of being has been breeding us so cleverly, unseen and unknown to us
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 11 months ago, 8 hours later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,439
boof replied with this 11 months ago, 28 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,446
@previous (M)
right. ending over a century and a half ago, it was not consistent or coordinated across the large land involved in the way that any captive animal breeding has ever been done, nor for as many generations since the humans are not able to breed within a couple of years. add to that the mixing with other people of other ethnicity -- it is rare for an "African American" to only have African black ancestry. it is difficult to characterize a randomly chosen person who looks like we should put them in the category of being a black that they really fit a category as well define as an official dog breed.
right. ending over a century and a half ago, it was not consistent or coordinated across the large land involved in the way that any captive animal breeding has ever been done, nor for as many generations since the humans are not able to breed within a couple of years. add to that the mixing with other people of other ethnicity -- it is rare for an "African American" to only have African black ancestry. it is difficult to characterize a randomly chosen person who looks like we should put them in the category of being a black that they really fit a category as well define as an official dog breed.
Anonymous M replied with this 11 months ago, 53 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,449
@previous (boof)
> was not consistent or coordinated across the large land involved in the way that any captive animal breeding has ever been done
Very untrue.
> was not consistent or coordinated across the large land involved in the way that any captive animal breeding has ever been done
Very untrue.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 11 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,450
Anonymous M replied with this 11 months ago, 28 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,458
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 11 months ago, 6 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,349,460
@previous (M)
For certain breeds of dogs, they have been breed for certain reasons for hundreds of years
For certain breeds of dogs, they have been breed for certain reasons for hundreds of years