Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,277,221
Fake. If it was real, there would already be scabbing taking place. Also, a tattooist would have kept the letters spaced perfectly apart, and the H and A are touching.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,277,231
@previous (H) > If you had it for a while, the color would have faded by now. It's very dark, and still has a little shine to it, so it would be very recent.
I got the tattoo two weeks ago.
> Did you get it done at a tattoo shop?
No, it was done at in a personal area of a halfway house.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,277,238
@previous (H) > No you didn't, if you did, the shine would be gone, and it would have already started taking on a faded look.
For a matte tat, perhaps, but I went with glossy. There are many new pigments available today that weren't an option 20 years ago. There's even glow-in-the-dark ink.
> If that were true, that tattoo would have been so much shittier looking.
The artist was 6 months sober, the halfway house is just to prevent a relapse. He has steady hands.
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,277,239
@previous (A)
Bullshit, after about a week to a week and a half, the gloss starts to fade. I can also tell that is not gloss. Plus, your scabbing went away within 2 weeks?
Try again.
> He has steady hands.
I'm sure you would know that, but let's move on to more of your bullshit.
> On a standard tattoo, that would be true... this is not a traditional ink.
Whether standard or not, the ink will fade after a very short period of time.
> You just said it had a shine to it. Now you are saying it doesn't look shiny enough?
Are you really this stupid? Of course a new tattoo will have a shine for the first several days.
> Yes, sitting with someone for hours watching their hands make permanent changes to your body means you would know exactly how steady their hands are.
Above your head on what I meant, but ok... Yes, I know how steady the hands are during a tattooing. Are your hands not steady when you're writing a letter, or filling out paperwork?
> Have you ever had a tattoo?
Yes, I have 4.
> Did you not look at the hands of the person working on you??
No. Because I know the person who did it, was a pro.
> > On a standard tattoo, that would be true... this is not a traditional ink. > > Whether standard or not, the ink will fade after a very short period of time.
Not if you are using glossy ink, the entire point is the shine. > > > You just said it had a shine to it. Now you are saying it doesn't look shiny enough? > > Are you really this stupid? Of course a new tattoo will have a shine for the first several days.
Then why say "I can also tell that is not gloss." if it's shiny? > > Yes, sitting with someone for hours watching their hands make permanent changes to your body means you would know exactly how steady their hands are. > > Above your head on what I meant, but ok... Yes, I know how steady the hands are during a tattooing. Are your hands not steady when you're writing a letter, or filling out paperwork?
You're the one suggesting I wouldn't know if someone who had their hands near me for an hour had steady hands.
Remind me where I said someone couldn't identify steady hands from paperwork.
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,277,306
@1,277,292 (A) > Not if you are using glossy ink, the entire point is the shine.
Try reading comprehension son, you might understand what you read.
Again, gloss does NOT stay shiny for a long period of time. It will fade.
> Then why say "I can also tell that is not gloss." if it's shiny?
And again, try reading comprehension sometime. All new tattoos have a shine, whether glossy or not. You claim you got this 2 weeks ago, there is no way it would still have that shine.
> You're the one suggesting I wouldn't know if someone who had their hands near me for an hour had steady hands.
Again, above your head since you didn't catch my drift..
> Remind me where I said someone couldn't identify steady hands from paperwork.
Did I say someone? No, I said you.
Reading comprehension, learn it, apply it, and stop making yourself look more retarded than you already have.
Try again, but after you have completed reading comprehension 101. Thanks.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 44 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,277,324
@previous (H) > That statement was made before he claimed he got it 2 weeks ago. Even then, he would still have some scabs on there.
Where? Cite the specific post.
> A real tattooist would not have them touch.
Yes they would have. Only an amateur or someone who doesn't know about tattoos or basic orthography wouldn't.
> Learn about tattoos before opening you big mouth son.
Your mom should've learned about dicks before she opened her vagina to my huge cock, faggot troll.
As well as no scabbing, there is no indication of healing process taking place at all on this tattoo. It should be obvious that it's healing. A body behaves toward a tattoo as if it was a burn. I do not believe this is a real photograph of a tattoo.