Topic: When texas doesn't want migrants, it's racism. When northern states don't, it's completely OK.
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,601
Texas should be able to fold in millions of poor people who don't speak English, but the northern states should have no obligation to contribute to the influx.
Bussing migrants is treating them like political pawns. When Biden orders border control to cut down the fencing Texas installed at the border, that isn't using them like political pawns at all, no siree.
Bussing migrants is treating them like political pawns. When Biden orders border control to cut down the fencing Texas installed at the border, that isn't using them like political pawns at all, no siree.
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,276,930
You son of a bitch, fuck you!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,942
exactly. i have yet to hear any leftist or dem explain why its bad to let them reap the arrivals from their own immigration policy and its part of the reason i left that scene.
Indie the Grate joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,944
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,026
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,027
Never understood what the big problem is. Birth rates are below replacement in the US and the population would be declining without immigration. What's worse is that among immigrants that settle in the US, within one generation their birth rates fall to the below-replacement levels of native born Americans. Not sure what people are expecting is going to happen within a few decades - the population of developed nations is going to drop off a cliff. China, Japan, and Korea are already starting to see the cracks. But let's all press on, pretend that it isn't happening, and then complain about a partial reversal of the problem?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,034
@previous (E)
> But let's all press on, pretend that it isn't happening, and then complain about a partial reversal of the problem?
That seems to be the attitude of snobby northerners turning up their noses when a bus full of brown people shows up in their city.
> But let's all press on, pretend that it isn't happening, and then complain about a partial reversal of the problem?
That seems to be the attitude of snobby northerners turning up their noses when a bus full of brown people shows up in their city.
Indie the Grate replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,037
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,067
@1,277,027 (E)
Less people means more homes available and more space available not only for the human population but for the animal population as well.
Less people means more homes available and more space available not only for the human population but for the animal population as well.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,068
@1,277,034 (A)
A) I'm from southern Arizona and am not unfamiliar.
B) Someone showing up somewhere is none of my or your business.
A) I'm from southern Arizona and am not unfamiliar.
B) Someone showing up somewhere is none of my or your business.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,069
@1,277,067 (F)
> Less people means more homes available
Look at how well the rust belt is doing.
> more space available
Has never been a problem. Take a flight anywhere and look out the window.
> Less people means more homes available
Look at how well the rust belt is doing.
> more space available
Has never been a problem. Take a flight anywhere and look out the window.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 2 years ago, 20 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,070
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,072
@1,277,069 (E)
The rust belt is quickly returning to its original state of natural beauty. Biodiversity is rising, pollution is down and the ordinary working people are able to afford big houses for less money because of the low demand.
The rust belt is quickly returning to its original state of natural beauty. Biodiversity is rising, pollution is down and the ordinary working people are able to afford big houses for less money because of the low demand.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,083
@previous (F)
> The rust belt is quickly returning to its original state of natural beauty. Biodiversity is rising, pollution is down
lol. Why don't we humans all agree to just kill ourselves and all species so the earth can turn back into its original, natural, beautifully lifeless state as a barren rock floating through space?
> and the ordinary working people are able to afford big houses for less money because of the low demand.
You sound like you've never been to the rust belt.
> The rust belt is quickly returning to its original state of natural beauty. Biodiversity is rising, pollution is down
lol. Why don't we humans all agree to just kill ourselves and all species so the earth can turn back into its original, natural, beautifully lifeless state as a barren rock floating through space?
> and the ordinary working people are able to afford big houses for less money because of the low demand.
You sound like you've never been to the rust belt.
Indie the Grate replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,087
@previous (E)
> Why don't we humans all agree to just kill ourselves and all species so the earth can turn back into its original, natural, beautifully lifeless state as a barren rock floating through space?
Planetary biospheres don't work the way you think they work. My amusement is almost palpable.
> Why don't we humans all agree to just kill ourselves and all species so the earth can turn back into its original, natural, beautifully lifeless state as a barren rock floating through space?
Planetary biospheres don't work the way you think they work. My amusement is almost palpable.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,126
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,226
@1,277,083 (E)
> Biodiversity is rising and nature is reclaiming former brick and steel hellscapes, this is good
> HURRRRR SO WHAT YOU MEAN IS WE SHOULD DESTROY ALL LIFE AND LEAVE NOTHING BEHIND DURRRRRR
> Biodiversity is rising and nature is reclaiming former brick and steel hellscapes, this is good
> HURRRRR SO WHAT YOU MEAN IS WE SHOULD DESTROY ALL LIFE AND LEAVE NOTHING BEHIND DURRRRRR
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,288
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,289
Are those Northern states, praytell, putting razor wire in rivers and just watching as children get cut up and drown?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,290
@previous (G)
Why are children floating in on the river instead of at a border checkpoint? Are those "children" actually grown men claiming to not have paperwork?
Why are children floating in on the river instead of at a border checkpoint? Are those "children" actually grown men claiming to not have paperwork?
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,294
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,296
@previous (G)
If they aren't floating through the river, then it sounds like getting cut up and drowned in a river is a non-issue.
If they aren't floating through the river, then it sounds like getting cut up and drowned in a river is a non-issue.
