Topic: Does anyone remember the Minichan v Tinychan board war?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,568
when Ltamake stole the footer or some shit and removed the tinybbs attribution and r04r and sim went nuts
TC now has bumps that are two weeks old on the front page!! MC is the clear victor :)))
i admire the restraint of the mods and admins here not going to rub it in their faces
TC now has bumps that are two weeks old on the front page!! MC is the clear victor :)))
i admire the restraint of the mods and admins here not going to rub it in their faces
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later[^] [v] #1,276,480
@OP> TC now has bumps that are two weeks old on the front page!!
Who'd have thought driving away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile would lead to a dead board? Knows how to run a railway does Fuckalms!
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,481
He didn't steal the footer, IIRC he used the database class and then removed the TinyBBS link from the footer. He later added it back and everyone got along.
I haven't really used Tinychan since the exodus™ of 2010 that brought us all here, so I have no idea what's going on over there nowadays and have no interest in discovering. The 2009 days and tiny.4chan.org were good fun though. I only had a brief glimpse of the very early days.
I haven't really used Tinychan since the exodus™ of 2010 that brought us all here, so I have no idea what's going on over there nowadays and have no interest in discovering. The 2009 days and tiny.4chan.org were good fun though. I only had a brief glimpse of the very early days.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,482
@1,276,480 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
He also hates his users which is a very very awful trait for a mod or admin. He has killed TinyChan.
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
you aren't missing anything. I wasn't there for 2009 or 2010 but I'm told it was an active and interesting place. Now it's pedoshit. FuckAlms himself is a pedophile
He also hates his users which is a very very awful trait for a mod or admin. He has killed TinyChan.
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
you aren't missing anything. I wasn't there for 2009 or 2010 but I'm told it was an active and interesting place. Now it's pedoshit. FuckAlms himself is a pedophile
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,483
@previous (A)
> I wasn't there for 2009 or 2010 but I'm told it was an active and interesting place.
It was. It had a lot of interesting characters and was very active in its heyday.
All of the *chans are dying a slow death. I don't particularly care for Tinychan, but TC and MC are the only two extant TinyBBS/MiniBBS boards left, out of the twenty or so that have come and gone over the years. I hope they keep limping along for a good while yet.
(The only place ATBBS is still running is http://atbbs.lostsig.co and it's broken and abandoned but inexplicably still up, 10+ years after we stopped using Lost Signal hosting (remember SeanieB?!)).
> I wasn't there for 2009 or 2010 but I'm told it was an active and interesting place.
It was. It had a lot of interesting characters and was very active in its heyday.
All of the *chans are dying a slow death. I don't particularly care for Tinychan, but TC and MC are the only two extant TinyBBS/MiniBBS boards left, out of the twenty or so that have come and gone over the years. I hope they keep limping along for a good while yet.
(The only place ATBBS is still running is http://atbbs.lostsig.co and it's broken and abandoned but inexplicably still up, 10+ years after we stopped using Lost Signal hosting (remember SeanieB?!)).
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,486
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
I would prefer if TC died! Archive it and let it die already. Every good poster comes here eventually. TC is shitposts, pedo apologists and spam from social rejects and posters indistinguishable from bots
Half the people on TC are only there because they got the banhammer from this place anyway 😉
I would prefer if TC died! Archive it and let it die already. Every good poster comes here eventually. TC is shitposts, pedo apologists and spam from social rejects and posters indistinguishable from bots
Half the people on TC are only there because they got the banhammer from this place anyway 😉
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,487
That reminds me, what happened to Bert
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,511
@1,276,481 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> He later added it back and everyone got along.
Not really. After r04r made a complete ass of herself in such an ironic way (think about the larger context here for one second lmao), few took her seriously. I guess you could call that getting along. But only in the sense that people got that she's kinda retarded and shouldn't be taken seriously.
> He later added it back and everyone got along.
Not really. After r04r made a complete ass of herself in such an ironic way (think about the larger context here for one second lmao), few took her seriously. I guess you could call that getting along. But only in the sense that people got that she's kinda retarded and shouldn't be taken seriously.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,513
@1,276,486 (A)
It won't be long before bumps are months old and fewer and fewer people will care to "join in". But considering how absurdly cheap TinyBBS is to run (you could get by just fine with a $5/month VPS) and how little "maintenance" is ever required, there's no reason to think it won't be kept running.
It won't be long before bumps are months old and fewer and fewer people will care to "join in". But considering how absurdly cheap TinyBBS is to run (you could get by just fine with a $5/month VPS) and how little "maintenance" is ever required, there's no reason to think it won't be kept running.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,515
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
did you ever fix the minichan software or is it still reliant on ancient dependencies that aren't compatible with modern operating systems / no longer exist on the public internet?
did you ever fix the minichan software or is it still reliant on ancient dependencies that aren't compatible with modern operating systems / no longer exist on the public internet?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,516
@1,276,511 (D)
The whole thing was a storm in a teacup, but Sim's reaction was the funniest.
<sim> so nice to have people help me when im being attacked by to4str, ltamake, and a bunch of angry anons
<sim> cheers
<sim> why isnt any fucking TC mod pointing out ltamake is lying asshole
<sim> you guys know better
<sim> fucking disappointing
<sim> im off for tonight
sim has quit (Quit: goodnight)
The whole thing was a storm in a teacup, but Sim's reaction was the funniest.
<sim> so nice to have people help me when im being attacked by to4str, ltamake, and a bunch of angry anons
<sim> cheers
<sim> why isnt any fucking TC mod pointing out ltamake is lying asshole
<sim> you guys know better
<sim> fucking disappointing
<sim> im off for tonight
sim has quit (Quit: goodnight)
tteh !MemesToDNA double-posted this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,518
@1,276,515 (E)
It still has some old dependencies, but none of real consequence anymore (meaning: it's at least secure). It's still not straightforward to set up unless you know what you're doing. I embarked on a complete rewrite at one point but realised literally nobody would notice/care, and I'd much rather do work that will pay me.
The idea of a forum that automatically makes every visitor an account is probably retarded anyway on today's Internet, let's be honest.
Neither Minichan nor Tinychan make their source available anymore.
It still has some old dependencies, but none of real consequence anymore (meaning: it's at least secure). It's still not straightforward to set up unless you know what you're doing. I embarked on a complete rewrite at one point but realised literally nobody would notice/care, and I'd much rather do work that will pay me.
The idea of a forum that automatically makes every visitor an account is probably retarded anyway on today's Internet, let's be honest.
Neither Minichan nor Tinychan make their source available anymore.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,519
I first started going to TC when there was a war going on with Bert vs everyone else. Bert couldn't win no matter how hard he tried.
After that died down, the site pretty well went downhill for me, so I haven't been back there since.
After that died down, the site pretty well went downhill for me, so I haven't been back there since.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,520
@1,276,480 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> > TC now has bumps that are two weeks old on the front page!!
>
> Who'd have thought driving away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile would lead to a dead board? Knows how to run a railway does Fuckalms!
They didn't drive away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile. Just you. Now go put some ointment on your butthurt. LOL
> > TC now has bumps that are two weeks old on the front page!!
>
> Who'd have thought driving away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile would lead to a dead board? Knows how to run a railway does Fuckalms!
They didn't drive away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile. Just you. Now go put some ointment on your butthurt. LOL
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,521
@previous (G)
> They didn't drive away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile. Just you.
Read that back to yourself and see what a berk you just made of yourself.
> They didn't drive away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile. Just you.
Read that back to yourself and see what a berk you just made of yourself.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,522
@1,276,516 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
I was trying to encourage squeegee to start a board a while back. We need more reactive/unstable/autistic people running boards. Otherwise the drama that is the lifeblood of the community dries up. Kind of like what Thomas Jefferson said about needing the spilling of blood every so often to keep things fresh. Also reminds me of an inspiring quote by Teddy Roosevelt.
I never looked at the source code of these boards, but if it's such a struggle to setup, I can't understand why anyone would bother with MiniBBS to begin with since I've seen many people complain that it was poorly written from the beginning. Coding something from scratch I don't think should take more than 2 weekends. Maybe a little longer to get all the bugs and quirks ironed out, but I can't imagine it taking all that much work to get something running from scratch. The stylesheets and design are already made. Stopforumspam blacklist plus a captcha, and you're set. I'd imagine it'd take just as much time fucking around trying to get MiniBBS running and be more enjoyable anyway than working with poorly written code.
What would be most useful is colorised names for the "Anonymous A", B, C, labels like GHOUL had. It makes it a lot easier to follow conversations, like syntax highlighting is for code.
I was trying to encourage squeegee to start a board a while back. We need more reactive/unstable/autistic people running boards. Otherwise the drama that is the lifeblood of the community dries up. Kind of like what Thomas Jefferson said about needing the spilling of blood every so often to keep things fresh. Also reminds me of an inspiring quote by Teddy Roosevelt.
I never looked at the source code of these boards, but if it's such a struggle to setup, I can't understand why anyone would bother with MiniBBS to begin with since I've seen many people complain that it was poorly written from the beginning. Coding something from scratch I don't think should take more than 2 weekends. Maybe a little longer to get all the bugs and quirks ironed out, but I can't imagine it taking all that much work to get something running from scratch. The stylesheets and design are already made. Stopforumspam blacklist plus a captcha, and you're set. I'd imagine it'd take just as much time fucking around trying to get MiniBBS running and be more enjoyable anyway than working with poorly written code.
What would be most useful is colorised names for the "Anonymous A", B, C, labels like GHOUL had. It makes it a lot easier to follow conversations, like syntax highlighting is for code.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,523
@previous (D)
> What would be most useful is colorised names for the "Anonymous A", B, C, labels like GHOUL had. It makes it a lot easier to follow conversations, like syntax highlighting is for code.
I could do that and make it a toggleable setting. What was coloured, just the name? Did that not become a mess in enormous threads?
> What would be most useful is colorised names for the "Anonymous A", B, C, labels like GHOUL had. It makes it a lot easier to follow conversations, like syntax highlighting is for code.
I could do that and make it a toggleable setting. What was coloured, just the name? Did that not become a mess in enormous threads?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,528
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> >What would be most useful is colorised names for the "Anonymous A", B, C, labels like GHOUL had. It makes it a lot easier to follow conversations, like syntax highlighting is for code.
>
> I could do that and make it a toggleable setting. What was coloured, just the name? Did that not become a mess in enormous threads?
No it was incredibly helpful because you couldn’t enter a thread as anon and then just change your name to avoid detection. So your color was your marker not your name.
> >What would be most useful is colorised names for the "Anonymous A", B, C, labels like GHOUL had. It makes it a lot easier to follow conversations, like syntax highlighting is for code.
>
> I could do that and make it a toggleable setting. What was coloured, just the name? Did that not become a mess in enormous threads?
No it was incredibly helpful because you couldn’t enter a thread as anon and then just change your name to avoid detection. So your color was your marker not your name.
Anonymous H double-posted this 2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,529
It’s similar to the post id feature on /pol/
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,531
@1,276,523 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
I think it was just the name. I think that'd look best anyway. I don't remember it becoming a mess. It probably just cycled the colors once they ran out from the manually set list. None of the colors were hard to read or too jarring to look at.
I personally think the names should not be colored when posting with a name. I think that's a quirk of the board people have used sometimes intentionally to obscure who they are and I think it's best to preserve that and not do things retroactively to reveal even partial identities. Maybe going forward you could colorize even named posters, but not retroactively.
I think it was just the name. I think that'd look best anyway. I don't remember it becoming a mess. It probably just cycled the colors once they ran out from the manually set list. None of the colors were hard to read or too jarring to look at.
I personally think the names should not be colored when posting with a name. I think that's a quirk of the board people have used sometimes intentionally to obscure who they are and I think it's best to preserve that and not do things retroactively to reveal even partial identities. Maybe going forward you could colorize even named posters, but not retroactively.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 12 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,595
@1,276,480 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> driving away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile
Thank you for admitting that either:
- you are a "raging pedophile", because you are still active on the board.
or:
- you have been driven off the board (and are extremely arse-sore about it).
> driving away everyone who isn't a raging pedophile
Thank you for admitting that either:
- you are a "raging pedophile", because you are still active on the board.
or:
- you have been driven off the board (and are extremely arse-sore about it).
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,598
@previous (I)
> you are still active on the board.
So you admit On unbanned me. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
By the way your little High Priest of Pedophiles is crying that he's all alone on his deserted wasteland of a board...
https://tinychan.net/topic/64430#reply_647747
:)
> you are still active on the board.
So you admit On unbanned me. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
By the way your little High Priest of Pedophiles is crying that he's all alone on his deserted wasteland of a board...
https://tinychan.net/topic/64430#reply_647747
:)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,599
Fuck Tinychan nobody gives a single shit about that dump
Anonymous J double-posted this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,600
@1,276,598 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
On is a weird Chinese kid, now adult I guess, who drew cartoons and spoke bad English and just didn't do much
very weird he's still around
On is a weird Chinese kid, now adult I guess, who drew cartoons and spoke bad English and just didn't do much
very weird he's still around
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,646
@1,276,598 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> So you admit On unbanned me. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
You picked the first one. So you admit that you are a "raging pedophile".
OK, thanks, that'll be all.
> By the way...
I thought you said that'll be all.
> So you admit On unbanned me. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
You picked the first one. So you admit that you are a "raging pedophile".
OK, thanks, that'll be all.
> By the way...
I thought you said that'll be all.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,650
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,652
@1,276,646 (I)
> > So you admit On unbanned me. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
> You picked the first one.
Yep, the one in which you admitted On unbanned me. Thanks, that'll be all.
By the way your Pedo Safe Space is still a deserted wasteland :))
> > So you admit On unbanned me. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
> You picked the first one.
Yep, the one in which you admitted On unbanned me. Thanks, that'll be all.
By the way your Pedo Safe Space is still a deserted wasteland :))
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,666
I lurk and use their irc, Dave is just upset his pedo ass got permabanned
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,667
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,669
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,676
Anonymous L replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,691
@1,276,669 (E)
FulkAcms paid someone on Fiverr to fill it with chatbots, but it was a by-the-hour deal.
FulkAcms paid someone on Fiverr to fill it with chatbots, but it was a by-the-hour deal.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,705
@1,276,652 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> > You picked the first one.
> Yep, the one in which you proposed correctly that I, Dave, am a "raging pedophile". Thanks, that'll be all.
Yes, that's it. Thank you for admitting it again.
> By the way... [snip more pedo-babble]
So, again, that wasn't "all"? Okay.
You are dismissed.
> > You picked the first one.
> Yep, the one in which you proposed correctly that I, Dave, am a "raging pedophile". Thanks, that'll be all.
Yes, that's it. Thank you for admitting it again.
> By the way... [snip more pedo-babble]
So, again, that wasn't "all"? Okay.
You are dismissed.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,717
@previous (I)
> > > You picked the first one.
> > Yep, the one in which you proposed correctly that I am a "raging pedophile".
Pretty much :)
You're dismissed, kid.
> > > You picked the first one.
> > Yep, the one in which you proposed correctly that I am a "raging pedophile".
Pretty much :)
You're dismissed, kid.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,734
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 20 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,936
@1,276,483 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Spanish websites, domingochan.org and chan.mx, are using an upgraded version of minibbs.
Spanish websites, domingochan.org and chan.mx, are using an upgraded version of minibbs.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,948
Anonymous L replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,952
Chuckle Brother 2 !ErY2TknG0w replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,960
Anonymous N replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,963
@1,276,952 (L)
https://chan.city/index.php?language=&software=minichan
Here is a list of boards using atbbs/minichan.
Domingochan is nearly identical (folks, replies, hot, etc.), only with images in the main index and a different style. It can only be seen on Sundays.
Chan.mx has many more changes (including a system of multiple boards), but you can notice it from the URLs. A clear example is: https://chan.mx/stuff Here is the same "stuff" section of Minichan but broken.
Some examples:
https://domingochan.org/new_topic
https://minichan.net/new_topic
https://chan.mx/new_topic
https://minichan.net/shuffle
https://chan.mx/shuffle
There it's also the @ instead of >> and Anonymous A, B, C...
https://chan.city/index.php?language=&software=minichan
Here is a list of boards using atbbs/minichan.
Domingochan is nearly identical (folks, replies, hot, etc.), only with images in the main index and a different style. It can only be seen on Sundays.
Chan.mx has many more changes (including a system of multiple boards), but you can notice it from the URLs. A clear example is: https://chan.mx/stuff Here is the same "stuff" section of Minichan but broken.
Some examples:
https://domingochan.org/new_topic
https://minichan.net/new_topic
https://chan.mx/new_topic
https://minichan.net/shuffle
https://chan.mx/shuffle
There it's also the @ instead of >> and Anonymous A, B, C...
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,967
@previous (N)
Come to think of it, r04r and I helped a Spanish guy who came to IRC with some issues getting set up, in maybe 2016 ish. I wonder if he's running something nowadays.
Come to think of it, r04r and I helped a Spanish guy who came to IRC with some issues getting set up, in maybe 2016 ish. I wonder if he's running something nowadays.
Anonymous L replied with this 2 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,968
@1,276,963 (N)
> It can only be seen on Sundays.
In what timezone? Are they trying to kill activity?
> Chan.mx has many more changes (including a system of multiple boards), but you can notice it from the URLs. A clear example is: https://chan.mx/stuff Here is the same "stuff" section of Minichan but broken.
> Some examples:
> https://domingochan.org/new_topic
> https://minichan.net/new_topic
> https://chan.mx/new_topic
>
> https://minichan.net/shuffle
> https://chan.mx/shuffle
>
> There it's also the @ instead of >> and Anonymous A, B, C...
Has anyone ever interacted with the spics on IRC or git? Or is this some group that was never around here
> It can only be seen on Sundays.
In what timezone? Are they trying to kill activity?
> Chan.mx has many more changes (including a system of multiple boards), but you can notice it from the URLs. A clear example is: https://chan.mx/stuff Here is the same "stuff" section of Minichan but broken.
> Some examples:
> https://domingochan.org/new_topic
> https://minichan.net/new_topic
> https://chan.mx/new_topic
>
> https://minichan.net/shuffle
> https://chan.mx/shuffle
>
> There it's also the @ instead of >> and Anonymous A, B, C...
Has anyone ever interacted with the spics on IRC or git? Or is this some group that was never around here
Anonymous L double-posted this 2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,969
@1,276,967 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> 48 seconds ago
> Come to think of it, r04r and I helped a Spanish guy who came to IRC with some issues getting set up, in maybe 2016 ish. I wonder if he's running something nowadays.
That answers that.
> 48 seconds ago
> Come to think of it, r04r and I helped a Spanish guy who came to IRC with some issues getting set up, in maybe 2016 ish. I wonder if he's running something nowadays.
That answers that.
Anonymous N replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,976
@1,276,967 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Domingochan opened in the first months of 2021. Chan.mx very recently.
@1,276,968 (L)
> In what timezone? Are they trying to kill activity?
Spanish-speaking world. The title of the site translates to "sundaychan," signifying that Domingochan is only open on Sundays. The admin recently mentioned the potential opening of an English version of the site (sundaychan.org), but nothing has materialized yet.
Domingochan opened in the first months of 2021. Chan.mx very recently.
@1,276,968 (L)
> In what timezone? Are they trying to kill activity?
Spanish-speaking world. The title of the site translates to "sundaychan," signifying that Domingochan is only open on Sundays. The admin recently mentioned the potential opening of an English version of the site (sundaychan.org), but nothing has materialized yet.
Anonymous L replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,985
@previous (N)
> Spanish-speaking world.
Mexico City, Madrid, and Buenos Aries are all in different timezone.
> Spanish-speaking world.
Mexico City, Madrid, and Buenos Aries are all in different timezone.
Anonymous N replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,990
@previous (L)
The site opens at 00:00 on Sundays in Madrid, Spain (GMT+1) and closes at 23:59:59 on Sundays in Tijuana, Mexico (GMT-8).
The site opens at 00:00 on Sundays in Madrid, Spain (GMT+1) and closes at 23:59:59 on Sundays in Tijuana, Mexico (GMT-8).
Anonymous L replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,276,993
@previous (N)
𝖤𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 "𝖣𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗇" 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻 𝖾𝗌𝗍á 𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗅 𝗍é𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈 "𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈" 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖾. 𝖲𝗂𝗇 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖼𝗂ó𝗇, 𝗒𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗇 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖾𝗌𝗍á 𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝟥𝟦 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖤𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝗂ó𝗇 𝗒 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂ó𝗇 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇 𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖽í𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖠𝖽𝖾𝗆á𝗌, 𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉ó𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻. 𝖤𝗇 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈, "𝖣𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗇" 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇, 𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗎𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈. 𝖤𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗃𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝗒 𝗆𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝗌𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖲𝗂 𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 ú𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗒 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗈. 𝖴𝗇𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 "𝖳𝗈𝖽𝗈𝖬𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗇" (𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗋) 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋í𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗃𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗒 𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗋ó𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝗒 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗆á𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖮𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝗋í𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗅 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝟤𝟦 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅 𝖽í𝖺, 𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗉𝗍á𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗌í 𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗋𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗒 𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼í𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌.
𝖤𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 "𝖣𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗇" 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻 𝖾𝗌𝗍á 𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗅 𝗍é𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈 "𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈" 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖾. 𝖲𝗂𝗇 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖼𝗂ó𝗇, 𝗒𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗇 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖾𝗌𝗍á 𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝟥𝟦 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖤𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝗂ó𝗇 𝗒 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂ó𝗇 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇 𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖽í𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖠𝖽𝖾𝗆á𝗌, 𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉ó𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻. 𝖤𝗇 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈, "𝖣𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗇" 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇, 𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗎𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈. 𝖤𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗃𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝗒 𝗆𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝗌𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖲𝗂 𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 ú𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗒 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗈. 𝖴𝗇𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 "𝖳𝗈𝖽𝗈𝖬𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗇" (𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗋) 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝗐𝖾𝖻. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋í𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗃𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗒 𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗋ó𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝗒 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗆á𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖮𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝗋í𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗅 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝟤𝟦 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅 𝖽í𝖺, 𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗉𝗍á𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗌í 𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗋𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗒 𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖼𝗂ó𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗋í𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼í𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous N replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,002
Anonymous L replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,005
Anonymous N replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,277,012
@previous (L)
lol
tal vez si tomaras las medicinas
o creyeras en el que es uno y todo a la vez
las cosas irían mejor
lol
tal vez si tomaras las medicinas
o creyeras en el que es uno y todo a la vez
las cosas irían mejor
(Edited 1 minute later.)