Topic: So, no proof?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #115,388
Thanks, that will be all.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #1,274,406
Go on, say it.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,407
dude I was there
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,416
Citation needed.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,418
Here is a list of words. Tell me what connects them.
Pillow
Antelope
Hyacinth
Engine
Tail
Constellation
Horse
Pillow
Antelope
Hyacinth
Engine
Tail
Constellation
Horse
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,432
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,434
@1,274,418 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
All nouns. All have nothing to do with each other. None of them have the vowel U. All of them have at least 2 different vowels.
All nouns. All have nothing to do with each other. None of them have the vowel U. All of them have at least 2 different vowels.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,435
@previous (G)
> All have nothing to do with each other.
Horse and tail have nothing to do with each other? You're not very bright are you?
> All have nothing to do with each other.
Horse and tail have nothing to do with each other? You're not very bright are you?
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 45 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,437
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
No good finding a link between a single pair that doesn't apply to all of them, dipshit.
Like... Pillow and hyacinth can both be placed in a bed. What has that got to do with antelope?
You're not very bright. Period.
No good finding a link between a single pair that doesn't apply to all of them, dipshit.
Like... Pillow and hyacinth can both be placed in a bed. What has that got to do with antelope?
You're not very bright. Period.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,438
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,439
@1,274,437 (G)
> No good finding a link between a single pair that doesn't apply to all of them.
Nice goalpost-shifting!
@1,274,434 (G)
> All have nothing to do with each other.
You're really not very bright are you? :)
> No good finding a link between a single pair that doesn't apply to all of them.
Nice goalpost-shifting!
@1,274,434 (G)
> All have nothing to do with each other.
You're really not very bright are you? :)
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 2 years ago, 19 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,440
@1,274,438 (D)
> I'm still trying to figure out how an engine plays into all of this...
Let me know if you need a clue.
> I'm still trying to figure out how an engine plays into all of this...
Let me know if you need a clue.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,442
@1,274,439 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> Nice goalpost-shifting!
No it isn't. And they are your goalposts.
You are really quite thick, aren't you?
@1,274,438 (D)
> I'm still trying to figure out how an engine plays into all of this...
It doesn't. He's just bullshitting. There is no connection beyond the superficial ones I mentioned (all nouns, no letter U).
If I'm wrong then Dave will surely take great delight in demonstrating it. But it won't happen, because he can't. Because there is no connection. He's full of shit.
Go on Dave, prove me wrong.
> Nice goalpost-shifting!
No it isn't. And they are your goalposts.
You are really quite thick, aren't you?
@1,274,438 (D)
> I'm still trying to figure out how an engine plays into all of this...
It doesn't. He's just bullshitting. There is no connection beyond the superficial ones I mentioned (all nouns, no letter U).
If I'm wrong then Dave will surely take great delight in demonstrating it. But it won't happen, because he can't. Because there is no connection. He's full of shit.
Go on Dave, prove me wrong.
Anonymous G double-posted this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,443
And, what a surprise, he's slunk off.
Thanks, that'll be all.
Thanks, that'll be all.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,445
@1,274,442 (G)
> It doesn't. He's just bullshitting. There is no connection beyond the superficial ones I mentioned
Nice goalpost-shifting. First you said there's no connection between any of them. You really are quite dim aren't you?
> If I'm wrong then Dave will surely take great delight in demonstrating it.
Indeed I am :)
> It doesn't. He's just bullshitting. There is no connection beyond the superficial ones I mentioned
Nice goalpost-shifting. First you said there's no connection between any of them. You really are quite dim aren't you?
> If I'm wrong then Dave will surely take great delight in demonstrating it.
Indeed I am :)
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,446
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> First you said there's no connection between any of them.
Correct. I'm still saying that. The only thing that connects all of them is that there is no common connection beyond the superficial.
Nothing has changed. No goalposts have shifted. Come on Dave, this is a lot easier to understand than say Russell's Paradox.
Having to repeat myself so that your slow and simple mind can keep up is so very tiresome.
> Indeed I am :)
You have demonstrated nothing. The more you delay in showing what connects those words, the more you prove me correct. Thanks.
> First you said there's no connection between any of them.
Correct. I'm still saying that. The only thing that connects all of them is that there is no common connection beyond the superficial.
Nothing has changed. No goalposts have shifted. Come on Dave, this is a lot easier to understand than say Russell's Paradox.
Having to repeat myself so that your slow and simple mind can keep up is so very tiresome.
> Indeed I am :)
You have demonstrated nothing. The more you delay in showing what connects those words, the more you prove me correct. Thanks.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,447
@previous (G)
> > First you said there's no connection between any of them.
> Correct.
So you've admitted I was right and thrown in the towel. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
> > First you said there's no connection between any of them.
> Correct.
So you've admitted I was right and thrown in the towel. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,449
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> So you've admitted I was right
That's what you got from my last reply? Lol, you are floundering mate. It's laughable how poor your level of basic comprehension is.
> thrown in the towel
That's what I'd be doing right about now if I were you. You've already made a massive plonker of yourself. Do yourself a favour and admit your defeat. Let this be a lesson to you, son.
> So you've admitted I was right
That's what you got from my last reply? Lol, you are floundering mate. It's laughable how poor your level of basic comprehension is.
> thrown in the towel
That's what I'd be doing right about now if I were you. You've already made a massive plonker of yourself. Do yourself a favour and admit your defeat. Let this be a lesson to you, son.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 52 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,458
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,466
The whole thing is pretty sad tbh. It seems like the sole goal is to get replies, which is incredibly easy in a community as lax as here. Ordinarily a good troll saga would get many replies AND get people angry, with that last bit being the critical component and the first bit being an optional bonus. But to just be a mild combination of annoying and spammy, well, I'm not sure what the point is at all because it takes no skill and seems like a waste of everyone's time for no benefit to anyone. It's like the whole "I'm not retarded, I'm just pretending to be meme", except now Dave's like 30 something and has a job and family.
As I said, shit's sad. And weird.
As I said, shit's sad. And weird.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,471
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,474
@1,274,466 (B)
> The whole thing is pretty sad tbh. It seems like the sole goal is to get replies, which is incredibly easy in a community as lax as here. Ordinarily a good troll saga would get many replies AND get people angry, with that last bit being the critical component and the first bit being an optional bonus. But to just be a mild combination of annoying and spammy, well, I'm not sure what the point is at all because it takes no skill and seems like a waste of everyone's time for no benefit to anyone. It's like the whole "I'm not retarded, I'm just pretending to be meme", except now Dave's like 30 something and has a job and family.
>
> As I said, shit's sad. And weird.
Thanks for replying! :)
> The whole thing is pretty sad tbh. It seems like the sole goal is to get replies, which is incredibly easy in a community as lax as here. Ordinarily a good troll saga would get many replies AND get people angry, with that last bit being the critical component and the first bit being an optional bonus. But to just be a mild combination of annoying and spammy, well, I'm not sure what the point is at all because it takes no skill and seems like a waste of everyone's time for no benefit to anyone. It's like the whole "I'm not retarded, I'm just pretending to be meme", except now Dave's like 30 something and has a job and family.
>
> As I said, shit's sad. And weird.
Thanks for replying! :)
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,475
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Any time. Although maybe you'd be a little more happy spending your time vying for your wife's attention, and not the attention of men online that you've never met :)
Any time. Although maybe you'd be a little more happy spending your time vying for your wife's attention, and not the attention of men online that you've never met :)
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 26 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,490
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,494
Matt's back. Dave will have to jockey with him now for attention. Expect the onslaught to pick up at a fevered pace.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,495
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,498
@1,274,494 (I)
Please stop constantly bringing up "Matt" in threads that have nothing to do with him. YOU are the one causing all the "onslaught", as you say.
Please stop constantly bringing up "Matt" in threads that have nothing to do with him. YOU are the one causing all the "onslaught", as you say.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,499
@1,274,495 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Definitely. He doesn't even care if that means he's getting trolled in the process. He is that desperate for attention from random men on the internet.
Definitely. He doesn't even care if that means he's getting trolled in the process. He is that desperate for attention from random men on the internet.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,503
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,505
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Sure thing, Dave. Now how about closing your browser and going and giving your wife a kiss and your daughter a hug. This obsession of yours is beginning to take its toll.
Sure thing, Dave. Now how about closing your browser and going and giving your wife a kiss and your daughter a hug. This obsession of yours is beginning to take its toll.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,507
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,510
Replying
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 31 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,515
high quality thread
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,521
why come i dont get a thank you
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,529
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
You're not one of the TC Pedo Chuckle Brothers. There's no comedy in reeling you in.
You're not one of the TC Pedo Chuckle Brothers. There's no comedy in reeling you in.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,612
@1,274,521 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
If you troll him or get the better of him in an argument, or criticise him in any way, or make fun of him, he will include you in the merry band of "TC Pedo Chuckle" brothers who live rent free in his head. Then, any comment you make in response to any of his posts he will count as "reeling you in".
If you troll him or get the better of him in an argument, or criticise him in any way, or make fun of him, he will include you in the merry band of "TC Pedo Chuckle" brothers who live rent free in his head. Then, any comment you make in response to any of his posts he will count as "reeling you in".
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,618
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,849
So, still no proof? Thanks, that will be all.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,857
@previous (A)
> So, still no proof? Thanks, that will be all.
I think the users here just aren't very bright :) They still can't figure out what connects:
Pillow
Antelope
Hyacinth
Engine
Tail
Constellation
Horse
> So, still no proof? Thanks, that will be all.
I think the users here just aren't very bright :) They still can't figure out what connects:
Pillow
Antelope
Hyacinth
Engine
Tail
Constellation
Horse
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,859
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
I did figure it out. I'm sorry you are too dim-witted to understand the answer.
I did figure it out. I'm sorry you are too dim-witted to understand the answer.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,862
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,904
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> > I did figure it out.
> Then by all means share the answer!
I did. Not my fault you can't read or understand it.
> > I did figure it out.
> Then by all means share the answer!
I did. Not my fault you can't read or understand it.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,905
@previous (G)
This explains it.
@1,274,862 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
You need to learn to write better riddles.
This explains it.
@1,274,862 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
You need to learn to write better riddles.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,907
@1,274,904 (G)
> > > I did figure it out.
> > Then by all means share the answer!
> I did.
Citation needed.
> > > I did figure it out.
> > Then by all means share the answer!
> I did.
Citation needed.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,908
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 55 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,909
@1,274,905 (M)
> You need to learn to write better riddles.
Why, when dipshit Anon G up there doesn't even know what connects a horse and a tail...
@1,274,435 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> > All have nothing to do with each other.
>
> Horse and tail have nothing to do with each other? You're not very bright are you?
:))
> You need to learn to write better riddles.
Why, when dipshit Anon G up there doesn't even know what connects a horse and a tail...
@1,274,435 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> > All have nothing to do with each other.
>
> Horse and tail have nothing to do with each other? You're not very bright are you?
:))
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,910
@1,274,908 (N)
> > Citation needed.
>
> You just did. It's right there.
So you have no citation. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
> > Citation needed.
>
> You just did. It's right there.
So you have no citation. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
Anonymous N replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,911
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,912
@previous (N)
> Again, it's right there. Read it.
So you again have no citation. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
> Again, it's right there. Read it.
So you again have no citation. Ok thanks, that'll be all.
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,913
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,914
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,274,915
