Minichan

Topic: I'm so tired of AI shit.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM started this discussion 2 years ago #115,205

ChatGPT is starting to get shittier and shitter. Opera GX's new AI is even more shittier and likely based on GPT. It's enough to make me begin to question if this is just a fad that will die out eventually. Though it'll likely won't and we have to live with this shit for the rest of our lives.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later[^] [v] #1,272,841

Chill out man.

tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,842

I very much doubt it's a fad. I do think restriction-free AI will become a lot more popular soon though.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,844

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
What's the best restriction-free offline text AI at the moment?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,846

fuck you

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 44 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,850

@1,272,842 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
And it'll be terrible with the learning algorithm and people teaching it to do stupid shit.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,851

@1,272,844 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I'm wondering this as well.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,855

@1,272,844 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Your mom.

Anonymous F double-posted this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,856

@1,272,850 (Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM)
AI isn't going away and it's extremely silly to believe that it will never improve, when literally none of this - nothing remotely close to ChatGPT - was possible 10 years ago. You know that story about people in the 1800s being concerned New York city would be overflowing with horse shit and its population could never exceed some critical density? Yeah. Now we have cars.

Now this doesn't mean the singularity will happen, that AI will take over the world, or any of the other stupid shit that Musk and others are pushing. They don't believe that either. It's just an attempt to manipulate stock prices and regulate everyone else into oblivion.

But AI will change the world regardless and I would bet as much money as I could get my hands on that it will be the most significant invention in the past 100, no 1000, years.

(Edited 47 seconds later.)

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,857

@1,272,855 (F)

> Your mom.

She's kind of weird about "curse words" so she's been deprecated.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,875

Ever heard that ancient story about a bunch of people trying to build a tower up to heaven (or something idk)? God tried to nerf people and made them all speak different languages. I would compare that story to where ai is at, even though I don't really know anything about it tbh.

(Edited 35 seconds later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,876

@previous (G)
Sounds like one of those stories that only retards bring up just like everything else from the book it came from.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,878

@previous (F)

Sounds like you are super cool

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,879

@previous (G)
Feel free to contribute to the discussion at any time.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,880

@previous (F)

Which discussion, the topic or your crying? I see you don't like the bible, I wasn't even sure if it was from the bible, if I knew it triggered you I would perhaps try to compare it to something else.

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,881

@previous (G)
Seems like you're the one that's upset lol

Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,884

@previous (F)

lol no, just a genuine question

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 53 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,890

@previous (G)
Mad as hell lol

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,892

@previous (F)
Cry moar, faggot.

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,893

@previous (H)
😂

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,895

@1,272,856 (F)
Tell me how to get ChatGPT (both 3.5 and 4) to actually write code worth a damn.
There is clearly something I'm doing wrong.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,896

Also, not a Cato.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,897

@1,272,895 (Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM)
I mostly went to ChatGPT to try and code a web page with a script that can calculate the number of sidereal days until a certain date, but I have no idea how to check to see if the mathematics are accurate.

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,898

@previous (Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM)
> I have no idea how to check to see if the mathematics are accurate.
It is.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,899

@previous (F)
Someone here told me that the mathematics can't be accurate because it wasn't constructed for mathematics since it just takes queries of words and returns a response.

So, there is literally over 9,000 days until 24 December 2024? Because that was what the code generated.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,900

We will soon be rolling out MiniAI synthetic users trained on the posts of minichan. Soon, dozens or perhaps hundreds of "new" users will begin posting to help this place feel more alive and active.

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,902

@1,272,899 (Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM)
Based on a quick observation I just did of my local star patterns and a quick consult with a few star charts and Mayan codices, I'd have to agree with ChatGPT that, in this current epoch, Christmas Eve won't occur for over 9,000 days.

Anonymous F double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,903

@1,272,900 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If a mentally disabled man did that instead and attempted to appear more intelligent than he is, would that not be artificial intelligence?

Anonymous F triple-posted this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,906

Also, I want to say one more thing about this: it's a common misconception that ChatGPT wasn't constructed for mathematics. It was constructed by math. It can't be mathematically wrong, because it IS math.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,907

@1,272,902 (F)
This can't be right though. Why does this feel so inaccurate?

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 37 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,909

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,911

@1,272,907 (Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM)
It not only is right, but HAS to be right. Go buy a telescope and a star chart or two and verify for yourself.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,912

@1,272,903 (F)
Please do not speak about tteh that way. He is doing the most he can given his birth defect (being born Engl*sh).

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,937

@1,272,897 (Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM)
> I have no idea how to check to see if the mathematics are accurate.
Here are a few clues:
- A sidereal day is 4 minutes shorter than a solar day (i.e. it is 23 hours, 56 minutes)
- A sidereal year is 1 year + 1 day.
- 2024 is a leap year, so it will have 367 sidereal days.
- You can very easily find this information with Google.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,949

My bank has an ai

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,272,950

AI is superior. Thanks.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.