Minichan

Topic: Anniversary to JFK's assassination

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #114,683

Rest in piss.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later[^] [v] #1,268,612

he was a nice guy wtf are you talking about

wanted to stop the war

we need harvey oswald these days tho

open topped limos for the win!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,618

@previous (B)
Well, let's see...

His father was a political boss from a well-connected criminal family.

JFK was tepid and largely indifferent, if not overtly aggressive behind closed doors, to the civil rights movement. He and his brother wiretapped and then killed MLK. Yet somehow he gets credit for the civil rights movement.

Was a heavy drug user of prescription narcotics, had multiple affairs, yet was too much of a coward to present himself as anything other than the classic leave it to beaver 50s image.

Cultivated and actively encouraged a cult of personality.

With that, encouraged toxic patriotism and made every effort to inflame the Cold war for political gain. "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" The complete opposite of what a healthy government should function as.

Nearly caused a nuclear holocaust with the Cuban missile crisis. Probably catalyzed by his heavy usage of stimulants, sex steroids, and a whole host of other drugs. It was bad enough that his physician got fired and ended up being thrown under the proverbial bus since JFK can't take responsibility for what he himself demanded.

A few years after JFK dies, his brother kills a woman and gets off without a day in prison. Showing how truly untouchable this family not only believed they were but in a sense actually were. Luckily though, in JFK's case, he wasn't so untouchable by a bullet through his thick skull.

And much much more.

Fuck the whole lot of them.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,621

his brother wasnt very untouchable either by 1968.

and hating on him for using meds for pain from a war injury to the back is pretty mean.

u could say lbj was better in the sense he wanted to end poverty and this made that happen i guess. but he was a war hawk, whatever prod n cons.

maybe he wasnt that great, space race was exciting, did he at least avoid tax cuts for the rich or shipping jobs overseas?

seems like u might be cherry-picking the negatives.

(Edited 11 minutes later.)

Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,622

11/22/63 may be Stephen King's finest book.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,624

@1,268,621 (B)

> his brother wasnt very untouchable either by 1968.
Nothing came of it.

> and hating on him for using meds for pain from a war injury to the back is pretty mean.
The majority of what he took, and all of what contributed to his psychotic handling of everything he had any hand in, had nothing to do with pain. He had his doctor prescribe him recreational drugs. The pretense was all very thin and the reason why they felt the need to later cast blame on that physician because the picture of what was going on was atrocious and they knew it.

> u could say lbj was better in the sense he wanted to end poverty and this made that happen i guess. but he was a war hawk, whatever prod n cons.
We're not talking about LBJ here.

> seems like u might be cherry-picking the negatives.
The entire family tree of cherries was poisonous. You could pick one blind folded and have a pretty good idea of what you're going to get.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 38 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,626

@previous (A)
oh yr talking ted, i thought rfk who was killed too. real untouchable there!

i dont care about yr chip on shoulder about this family im trying to find the positives

which other than fdr with soc security and lbj with welfare and nixon with environmental protection seem pretty scarce yeah.

ted did fighting for the working class

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,648

@1,268,622 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
Oh it's worth reading? I haven't enjoyed much of his work post sobriety

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,701

jfk

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,709

@1,268,626 (B)

> i dont care about yr chip on shoulder about this family im trying to find the positives
And the reason you're having such a hard time is that there aren't any.

> ted did fighting for the working class
Lel

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,710

@1,268,622 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
That's great. But what are your thoughts on JFK

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,711

@1,268,648 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's great. But what are your thoughts on JFK

Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,268,730

@1,268,701 (E)
Yep. Pretty much.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.