Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later[^][v]#206,292
Good luck~!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#206,294
I have this strange feeling that you're going to claim the result was a 181.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#206,299
@previous (C)
Lolno. That kind of result is inaccurate anyway. Im hoping to be above the 98th percentile
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,541
fun fact: notch is a member of mensa
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 47 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,577
@previous (dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46)
All the more reason why it's a fucking disgrace of an organization.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,587
@previous (E)
Why, because notch and the other member are smarter than you?
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,612
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Because notch couldn't program himself out of a paper bag.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,615
@previous (E)
What does that have to do with Mensa?
> notch programs game
> makes millions
> anon angry
Makes sense.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,619
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM) > umad
Typical high quality response from Ks.
Making money != intelligence. Or are you suggesting things like Facebook become popular due to the sheer intelligence of their creator?
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,622
@206,612 (E)
you write an entire game on your own without bugs
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,624
@206,619 (E)
Again, what does that have to do with Mensa? You seem to have a very hard time answering direct and clear questions. Are you sure you're in a position to be judging others intelligence?
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,625
@206,622 (dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46)
Minecraft is no technical feat.
Anonymous E double-posted this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,628
@206,624 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
You don't have very good reading comprehension. If someone like notch is in mensa, the bar is set fairly low, obviously.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,630
> If someone like notch is in mensa, the bar is set fairly low, obviously.
Oh, okay. Anon makes wild claim, it must be true.
ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,638
@206,612 (E)
Notch isn't a bad programmer, his main problem is: > Java
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,639
@206,630 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
So are you suggesting a game that could and even should run on something like a 386, but instead requires gigabytes of ram and several GHz is a sign of intelligence?
dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,643
Anonymous E: Expert Notch's Intelligence Expert
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,644
@206,638 (ltamake !!onnLC5KY8)
The fact that he's even using Java is evidence he's a bad programmer.
r04r (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,646
@206,625 (E)
Then do it. Or at least tell me how you would accomplish it. You won't be able to use any proper existing rendering system because you don't want to render anything that's covered and you have to draw realistic lightning and all your terrain can change. That is VERY important. Every small block is a separate object which cast their own shadows and all that shit. Other better looking games? They all consist of way less separate details. Most of those games start to lag and crap out if you spawn a bit more things than they give you in the level (Which isn't a lot).
Anyway, you're just butthurt because you couldn't get anyone believe your IQ was 182 and that you were better than Mensa.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,647
ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,653
@206,644 (E)
Java is horrible, but just because he uses it doesn't mean he's a bad programmer.
brie !OudrPWaUDQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,654
@206,612 (E) > Because notch couldn't program himself out of a paper bag.
i watched notch create a raycasting engine in 5 minutes flat. Then he drew a paper bag level and escaped from it.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
r04r (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,655
@206,639 (E)
See @206,646 (r04r) for details. Especially the bit where it has a ton of separate objects in the 3d world.
Bonus question: What 386 resembles anything remotely similar to this on this scale? (No, 10x10x10 does NOT count. Remember everything has to be placeable and removable by the player)
ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,657
@206,654 (brie !OudrPWaUDQ)
This. He also made a dungeon game in 48 hours (which I played for a few hours). He's pretty talented at what he does.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,658
@206,646 (r04r) > You won't be able to use any proper existing rendering system because you don't want to render anything that's covered
View frustrum culling has been around since the start of 3D gaming. Not exactly groundbreaking tech.
> Every small block is a separate object which cast their own shadows and all that shit.
Rendering 101. And I thought the minecraft crowd was whining "graphics don't matter", that's why we're content with this pixelated shite that notch shit out while drunk > Other better looking games? They all consist of way less separate details
not even sure what 'way less separate details means' > nyway, you're just butthurt because you couldn't get anyone believe your IQ was 182 and that you were better than Mensa.
*181
oh, and > Go be angry somewhere else.
Anonymous E double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,660
@206,655 (r04r) > What 386 resembles anything remotely similar to this on this scale? (No, 10x10x10 does NOT count. Remember everything has to be placeable and removable by the player)
Doom ran on 386. And no not everything has to be in memory at the same time. That's why mincraft eats so much ram because of that idiotic mindset.
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,662
@previous (E) > implying that everything in minecraft is kept in RAM.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,664
@previous (brie !OudrPWaUDQ)
If it isn't that's even worse. He must instead be storing every binary flag as a long long int or some shit.
brie !OudrPWaUDQ replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,666
@previous (E) > implying that minecraft uses no RAM.
r04r (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 21 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,667
> >You won't be able to use any proper existing rendering system because you don't want to render anything that's covered > View frustrum culling has been around since the start of 3D gaming. Not exactly groundbreaking tech.
No, it's not. Now do it for everything. More importantly: You do it. You claim to know better than someone? Show it.
> >Every small block is a separate object which cast their own shadows and all that shit. > Rendering 101. And I thought the minecraft crowd was whining "graphics don't matter", that's why we're content with this pixelated shite that notch shit out while drunk
It looks pretty great with some texture packs. The game's in beta, I'm not surprised if it'll end up with another graphics overhaul near actual release date.
> >Other better looking games? They all consist of way less separate details > not even sure what 'way less separate details means'
In a modelling program you can create a big building exterior and export it as one object in the game world. That's easy, and low resource intensive. With minecraft that same building would consist of a LOT of small blocks which all take their own space (Each one has an X/Y/Z+other info, and that's before they have to enter the graphics buffer) as opposed to just one time X/Y/Z+other info for the bigger model.
> >nyway, you're just butthurt because you couldn't get anyone believe your IQ was 182 and that you were better than Mensa. > *181 > > oh, and > >Go be angry somewhere else.
No u, I'm bored. I'm banning you on sight again though if you're not coming up with any valid arguments.
r04r (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,668
@206,660 (E) > Doom ran on 386.
How is that even remotely comparable? See previous post.
> And no not everything has to be in memory at the same time. That's why mincraft eats so much ram because of that idiotic mindset.
You mentioned "View frustrum culling" yourself. Do you even know what you were talking about when you mentioned that?
As for the actual ram usage, minecraft uses about 1.3GB currently for the client? It's pretty much a full blown game now... Most games I have installed require 2GB+ ram. Your argument is invalid.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,669
@206,667 (r04r)
This troll is so shitty he had me defending notch. I don't even play Minecraft lol.
r04r (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,670
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,671
@206,667 (r04r)
View frustrum culling has been around since the 80s. > You do it. You claim to know better than someone? Show it.
I'm mentally retarded you broke back piece of shit. I don't need to show it if someone else has done it 30 years ago with hundreds of thousands of times less processing power and memory. > It looks pretty great with some texture packs. The game's in beta, I'm not surprised if it'll end up with another graphics overhaul near actual release date.
It needs a lot more than a texture back.
> In a modelling program you can create a big building exterior and export it as one object in the game world. That's easy, and low resource intensive. With minecraft that same building would consist of a LOT of small blocks which all take their own space (Each one has an X/Y/Z+other info, and that's before they have to enter the graphics buffer) as opposed to just one time X/Y/Z+other info for the bigger model.
That can be easily optimized easily.
> No u, I'm bored. I'm banning you on sight again though if you're not coming up with any valid arguments.
Peer reviewed medical journals aren't neough? Not sure what will be.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,672
@206,670 (r04r)
Code a braille mode for our blind minichan users.
r04r (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,674
> View frustrum culling has been around since the 80s.
So? Completely unrelated.
> >You do it. You claim to know better than someone? Show it. > I'm mentally retarded you broke back piece of shit. I don't need to show it if someone else has done it 30 years ago with hundreds of thousands of times less processing power and memory.
> I'm mentally retarded you broke back piece of shit.
We knew that already.
> if someone else has done it 30 years ago with hundreds of thousands of times less processing power and memory.
Facts
> >It looks pretty great with some texture packs. The game's in beta, I'm not surprised if it'll end up with another graphics overhaul near actual release date. > It needs a lot more than a texture back.
Not really. Opinions? I think so.
> > >In a modelling program you can create a big building exterior and export it as one object in the game world. That's easy, and low resource intensive. With minecraft that same building would consist of a LOT of small blocks which all take their own space (Each one has an X/Y/Z+other info, and that's before they have to enter the graphics buffer) as opposed to just one time X/Y/Z+other info for the bigger model. > That can be easily optimized easily.
Okay. How? > > >No u, I'm bored. I'm banning you on sight again though if you're not coming up with any valid arguments. > Peer reviewed medical journals aren't neough? Not sure what will be.
r04r (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,676
@206,672 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I just put in the shipping order for all those braille pads.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,680
> > View frustrum culling has been around since the 80s. > So? Completely unrelated. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_frustum_culling > > >You do it. You claim to know better than someone? Show it. > > I'm mentally retarded you broke back piece of shit. I don't need to show it if someone else has done it 30 years ago with hundreds of thousands of times less processing power and memory. > > > I'm mentally retarded you broke back piece of shit. > We knew that already. > > > if someone else has done it 30 years ago with hundreds of thousands of times less processing power and memory. > Facts >
Look at any 3d game from that time period. > > >It looks pretty great with some texture packs. The game's in beta, I'm not surprised if it'll end up with another graphics overhaul near actual release date. > > It needs a lot more than a texture back. > Not really. Opinions? I think so. >
> > > > >In a modelling program you can create a big building exterior and export it as one object in the game world. That's easy, and low resource intensive. With minecraft that same building would consist of a LOT of small blocks which all take their own space (Each one has an X/Y/Z+other info, and that's before they have to enter the graphics buffer) as opposed to just one time X/Y/Z+other info for the bigger model. > > That can be easily optimized easily. > Okay. How? > >
The large majority of the blocks don't need subordinate coordinates. Simply don't store them until needed. Kind of like a copy on write technique > > >No u, I'm bored. I'm banning you on sight again though if you're not coming up with any valid arguments. > > Peer reviewed medical journals aren't neough? Not sure what will be.
...
> As for the actual ram usage, minecraft uses about 1.3GB currently for the client? It's pretty much a full blown game now... Most games I have installed require 2GB+ ram. Your argument is invalid.
Most games have real physics engines, actual realistic models with hundreds of thousands of popygons, and non-pixelated graphics.
r04r (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,682
@previous (E)
There is so much bullshit in that post, you're starting to get boring. Get the fuck out of my thread.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,683
@previous (r04r)
You're just angry that I'm not sucking your dick for being at a Mensa centre.
Anonymous E double-posted this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,684
> run out of bullshit to reply with > gtfo out or i'm banning you
Oh and typical ro4r reply
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 34 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,693
@previous (E)
You're trying so fucking hard, its sad really.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,803
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Pretty much any time someone makes a well-reasoned argument you many others come out of the woodwork to post typical meme replies like this.
cat !COOOOOLbus joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,816
ily r04r
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,820
> As for the actual ram usage, minecraft uses about 1.3GB currently for the client? It's pretty much a full blown game now... Most games I have installed require 2GB+ ram. Your argument is invalid.
Really? 2GB+? What do you play?
I can't break 1.4GB on BadCompany2, even on the largest maps, which one would think would suck up a lot.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,822
@previous (Fox !FXYGNx1XR.)
How much RAM do you have available?
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,824
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,830
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
64.
I tend to use about 55% idling.
Browsers and a few messaging services in the foreground, a bit more than a little in the background.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,834
I just started using 7 Ultimate myself, I'm loving it.
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,836
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
But of course. Only the best.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,855
edit:Oh shit, TL;DR. Sorry, uh... Anon E is wrong. k, bai.
I like how people talk about the game like it's already finished and isn't still beta. I will take Anonymous E's complaints more seriously once the game is released and all of the real problems are apparent. It's like arguing over the color of ugly exposed girders on an uncompleted skyscraper and calling the architect an idiot because it doesn't have carpet or wallboard yet.
Also, I would take E more seriously if he wasn't comparing it with the capabilities of DOOM and other early software and equipment. I remember running wolfenstein 3D on a 386 and how rendering a single room with a few sprites was a great accomplishment. Also, lolframerate. Doom was a huge improvement and ran exceptionally well on a 486dx2 66mhz with 8 (or was it 16, lol) megs of ram, but it really pushed the computer hard. Especially when playing multiplayer on a LAN, even with state of the art gaming rigs (at the time, lol) we had issues with lag. Sure, the graphics are similarly pixilated, but that doesn't mean they are the same.
Look at Grand theft Auto vs. Red Dead Redemption vs. LA NOIR. (all made recently and by Rockstar.) Each game has vastly different sized worlds, Red Dead Redemption easily being the biggest, but also sparsely populated and rendered mostly as wide sweeping vistas without much vertical height. They were able to use the extra resources to add detail to the horse animations (which look real as fuck) and character animations. Grand Theft Auto on the other hand had a smaller map, but taller, less detail in the animations, but more heavily populated. LA NOIR has the smallest map and little vertical height, but is heavily populated with characters and has a very new and very advanced animation engine and does some really sick shit with animation of faces. It really blew me away, but, gameplay was super linear and didn't have as much of a sandboxy feel as RDR and GTA.
Now my point in all this is that in order for Rockstar to use the different animation engines they had to make sacrifices in the way of map size and even gameplay. It's not that Rockstar took a step backwards by making maps smaller, or making a more linear game with limited capabilities, They had to compromise in order to achieve a different goal, enhanced graphics and animations. Minecraft makes similar compromises to make a destructible, rebuildable world. Look at games like Crysis, and the system requirements for Battlefield 3, both of which have tons of destructible objects in the world and beautiful graphics and physics. Sure, it can be done. But fuck you, not on a 386. Not even on most modern computers. Of course Minecraft can be refined, and eventually someone will write a similar, better game in a real programming language by a real software developer and they'll do it right. But I guarantee you won't see it run on any machine with less than 4gigs of ram and badass videocard.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,874
@previous (L) > I like how people talk about the game like it's already finished and isn't still beta. I will take Anonymous E's complaints more seriously once the game is released and all of the real problems are apparent. It's like arguing over the color of ugly exposed girders on an uncompleted skyscraper and calling the architect an idiot because it doesn't have carpet or wallboard yet.
What would happen if a major car company started releasing their cars as 'beta' and then at the face of any criticism their fanbois would cry 'it's only in beta any and every criticism will be fixed'. Meanwhile people are fucking dieing and countless innocent bystanders are being killed as your crap-ass-piece of shit falls apart. It's really no different than drunk driving, really.
> Also, I would take E more seriously if he wasn't comparing it with the capabilities of DOOM and other early software and equipment
I would take mincraft more seriously if it didn't have a rendering engine worse than that of DOOM and even earlier software. And I used the 386 as an extreme example as what minecraft should be playable on, even if slow. There's absolutely no excuse for it to require several thousands of times more memory and processing capabilities. It's surreal even.
> Sure, the graphics are similarly pixilated, but that doesn't mean they are the same.
Yeah, the only difference is that you can place blocks. Not sure why that should require a quad core processor.
> Minecraft makes similar compromises to make a destructible, rebuildable world
No minecraft makes compromises first and almost exclusively to be written in java. With zero benefits.
I actually do have a 386 and it would be a fun little project to write something similar to minecraft. But I lack the time and it wouldn't be worth the effort anyways because there's little to no depth in minecraft.
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,879
> >I like how people talk about the game like it's already finished and isn't still beta. I will take Anonymous E's complaints more seriously once the game is released and all of the real problems are apparent. It's like arguing over the color of ugly exposed girders on an uncompleted skyscraper and calling the architect an idiot because it doesn't have carpet or wallboard yet. > What would happen if a major car company started releasing their cars as 'beta' and then at the face of any criticism their fanbois would cry 'it's only in beta any and every criticism will be fixed'. Meanwhile people are fucking dieing and countless innocent bystanders are being killed as your crap-ass-piece of shit falls apart. It's really no different than drunk driving, really.
How are video games even remotely related to car crashes? This is a straw man if I've ever seen one. You're really reaching, bud.
> >Also, I would take E more seriously if he wasn't comparing it with the capabilities of DOOM and other early software and equipment > I would take mincraft more seriously if it didn't have a rendering engine worse than that of DOOM and even earlier software. And I used the 386 as an extreme example as what minecraft should be playable on, even if slow. There's absolutely no excuse for it to require several thousands of times more memory and processing capabilities. It's surreal even.
No, it's rendering engine is far more complex than doom. Doom was really, really simple. If you want to make car comparisons then you're trying to compare a modern sedan to a model-T, and complaining that the modern sedan "does the same thing, but at a far greater cost."
> >Sure, the graphics are similarly pixilated, but that doesn't mean they are the same. > Yeah, the only difference is that you can place blocks. Not sure why that should require a quad core processor.
Implying it needs a quad-core processor, you fucking retard
> >Minecraft makes similar compromises to make a destructible, rebuildable world > No minecraft makes compromises first and almost exclusively to be written in java. With zero benefits.
No argument. Smartest thing you've said all thread.
> I actually do have a 386 and it would be a fun little project to write something similar to minecraft. But I lack the time and it wouldn't be worth the effort anyways because there's little to no depth in minecraft.
Boastful lying makes you sound like a retard. "I can do it, but I'm not going to because it's stupid." Oh, okay. Try making a grown-up argument, child.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,882
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 53 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,903
@previous (L)
The most common sign of autism is the inability to detect context. A small, sarcastic joke in the midst of a conversation is not trolling.
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,905
@previous (E)
Resorting to insults is a sure sign of stupidity. Prove me wrong.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,907
@previous (L)
So you're calling yourself stupid too. At least we're on the same playing field now.
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,908
@previous (E)
Stating a fact does not equal making an insult. If you see it that way, perhaps you have some reflecting to do.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,910
@previous (L)
Your opinions are not fact. And by suggesting that autism is something to be insulted or ashamed of is an insult to all autistics. Reap what you sow, mother fucker. Reap what you sow.
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,912
@previous (E)
Lol, you're the one who brought autism into this, you fucking retard. Your opinions are not fact either, and you spewed your opinions way before I did. You just don't like having inferior, and misinformed opinions. not my fault, bud.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,918
ITT: anon E shows how autism effects a persons ability to make well reasoned arguments and valid comparrisons.
StatistSocialist3000 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,942
typical mc drama
ks spazzes out because someone has a different opinion to him. calls him a retard and a troll
r04r resorts to threats of modabuse instead of rational reasoned debate
anon is way too angry about a subject no one cares about
StatistSocialist3000 double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#206,943
hope you make it r04r it would be also to have a mensa person posting here
i didn't know you were so smart! what are your other talents/interests (apart from coding/mc)?
Anonymous M replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#207,034
@206,942 (StatistSocialist3000)
And in typical fashion, Mountainman shows up to declare everyone angry, stupid, and wrong. Sup mountainman? Hows your little girlfriend lately? Precious?
StatistSocialist3000 replied with this 15 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#207,334