Minichan

Topic: Crashing a car with security film

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #11,446

I was thinking about installing security film on the windows in my car. Basically the film is supposed to hold the glass together and make it more difficult to smash through. Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdMNEVqls8c That's all well and good, but in reality I am more likely going to have another crash instead of being robbed, and I'm concerned about how this security film would act. When I've crashed before, all the windows (apart from the windscreen and rear window) shattered really easy into little pieces and there was glass fucking everywhere. Security film is supposed to hold the glass together, so the glass wouldn't go anywhere and it would be marginally safer. But what about if you were to drive into a lake, some mud or some other nasty shit? You would need to break a window to get out. Security film companies say that their film is only designed to block attack from the outside and that you would still be able to kick the glass out easily, stopping you from drowning or whatever. Is this reality or just marketing? Would you still be able to exit the car by smashing windows from the inside? I am curious to hear your thoughts.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

cat !COOOOOLbus joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #205,996

here's an idea, to4str. don't drive like a fucking bigot.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,001

Yeah, just don't be a shit driver. If you were actually worried about anything regarding a car crash you would be more careful.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,002

@previous (C)
I drive a lot slowly and more careful now. Having a crash really shook me up and scared me (I came very close to dying).

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,004

@previous (A)
too bad you didn't, to4str

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,005

@previous (D)
Thanks. That's just lovely.

idiot !COOOOOLbus replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,006

@206,004 (D)

> too bad you didn't, to4str
lmfao

lol name

(Edited 34 seconds later.)

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,008

@206,005 (A)
iaa

Triptych !LightPenis joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,012

@206,002 (A)
Are you a good driver when you're careful?

!VoCaLoNunI joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,013

@previous (Triptych !LightPenis)

> Are you a good driver when you're not molesting the children in the back seats?

FTFY, and apparently not.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,017

@206,012 (Triptych !LightPenis)
Yeah. I haven't been driving for very long (4 years) but I'd say I'm a decent driver. I've had one crash, now I don't do hallucinogenics when driving or act like a boy racer too much, I'm much safer. All my passengers say I'm a good driver.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Triptych !LightPenis replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,019

@previous (A)
You should be fine, then. How likely d'you think you are to drive into mud or a lake or something similar?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,025

@previous (Triptych !LightPenis)
The chances of something like that happening are very low, but I still don't wanna do anything that will make it harder for me if I crash. Know what I mean? A friend of my mother died recently after coming off road and getting stuck in mud, she couldn't open the doors and was about my age.

Triptych !LightPenis replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,028

@previous (A)
True. Couldn't you open the window rather than kicking it out? .___.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,038

@previous (Triptych !LightPenis)
Well, typically the electrics are gonna cease to function after a head on collision or submerging the whole car in water (all my windows are electric), you really need to be able to smash the windows.

sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,040

you worry too much. you arent driving into a lake.

Triptych !LightPenis replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #206,044

@206,038 (A)
I see. You're going to have to take your pick, though. If you're more likely to crash into a building than drive into a lake, go for the security film. If vice versa, don't go for the film.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #206,053

@206,040 (sluggy)
> you worry too much.

Not gonna deny the fact that I'm paranoid.

@previous (Triptych !LightPenis)
Well, like I said, the companies that sell this claim that you can just kick the glass out from the inside and it isn't a problem. I'm not easily convinced which is why I'm asking about how easy it is to break that shit (from the inside).

Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #206,058

@previous (A)
Its only meant to protect your car from getting broken into really. The glass breaks in car crashes most often because of the frame crushing it, not because its hit from the outside. Save your money.

Triptych !LightPenis replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #206,059

@206,053 (A)
Chances are nobody here has used this product and, as such, nobody here can really tell you, man.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #206,068

@206,058 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Right. The film is supposed to hold the glass in place even if the frame bends it, it will come out as one or two big pieces and not shatter into tiny shards. I am often leaving my car in not so great areas and sleeping in it. I would feel happier doing this if the film was on there.

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #206,069

@previous (A)

> Right. The film is supposed to hold the glass in place even if the frame bends it, it will come out as one or two big pieces and not shatter into tiny shards.
Makes sense.

> I am often leaving my car in not so great areas and sleeping in it.
I like your style. I've slept in many cars, in many odd places.

> I would feel happier doing this if the film was on there.
Then go for it.

ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 days later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #209,523

Image went missing
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.