Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,265,731
@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
In a just society, everyone would be taken care of, and all jobs would have respect and importance. A cleaner's job is very important. Can you imagine if there were no cleaners or car washers? I am fine with jobs like doctors being paid more, but even the lowest jobs should receive living wages, healthcare, and other benefits.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,265,770
About two-thirds of all government spending is direct financial assistance or healthcare-related payments for the poor/elderly/disabled. @1,265,728 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
This depends on your state. Block grant programs like TANF and Medicaid, (or differently but analogously unemployment payments) leave a lot of discretion to states. If you live in a shithole red state you get what you vote for. If you live in a normal (blue) state you get relatively ok programs.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,265,773
@previous (dj cocos nucifera)
If you took every dollar spent on the military and spent it all on a Medicare for All program instead, you would fund it for about 3 months per year. There is no way to get European-style welfare state without European taxation levels on everyone. You'd need to increase the taxes on everyone earning between $30,000-100,000 by 50-100%, and taxes on people earning 100k+ by more than that. Which is fine by me, but historically that has been a hard sell politically.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,265,818
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Right, so roughly a 50% increase. And the higher you go in income, the greater the difference between U.S. and EU tax levels. Which is all fine and good, I am totally okay with paying substantially more in taxes for a substantially better social safety net. It's just not something that is easy to find the votes for in Congress because no one wants to be the person who voted to take hundreds to thousands of dollars out of people's paychecks tomorrow to fund a social safety net that will take years to be fully realized.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,265,819
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Maybe so. The Germans still end up with better lives and more money in pocket overall. They don’t have to pay tens of thousands a year in healthcare costs out of pocket, etc.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,265,863
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Then there is not having to pay for healthcare, several social services, etc. Americans pay tens of thousands of dollars per year on freaking healthcare alone, plus sales tax, local tax, and the other taxes you mentioned as well.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,265,866
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Without going into number stop death, my argument is this: overall, all things considered, Europeans (in Western European, socialist countries) have better lives and more money in their pockets.