Topic: Polyamory

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #114,245

is the most disgusting, degenerate, vile garbage that feminism ever put into our collective mind.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,264,453

You think feminism came up with it?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,459

Hasn't polyamory been like a default besides "the West" for like ever?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,465

Have you read the Bible, by chance?

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,485

@1,264,453 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
"Feminism" is so vague I'm not really sure how you could even argue it either way.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,486

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Well you could look at if having multiple partners existed before women could vote...

Also I'm pretty sure this is the anon who has the most consistently smooth brained takes

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,487

It's pornsick men who produced modern polyamory, not "feminism". Retard. I'm so glad you're single and a loser and will die a lonely death.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,489

Yes we should return to the good old fashioned system of concubines.

boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,493

they used to call it "side piece"

but I suppose using a multiple syllabic word gives it an air of respectability

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,495

@1,264,453 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes. Polyamory is just a way for women to sleep with multiple men without feeling guilty about it. Simps go along with it because they’re too afraid to be alone.

@1,264,459 (C)
Nope, humans are naturally monogamous.

@1,264,465 (D)
Yes. Polygamy was quite common and honestly still is. Chad harems are a thing and women are completely fine with it because they’re weak-willed.

@1,264,487 (F)
That’s not very nice. You don’t even know who I am.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,497

@previous (A)
The only difference between polygamy and polyamory, is which gender has multiple partners

Men came up with polygamy and are now mad because it's easier for women to find partners

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,502

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It’s more the fact that women think they are “sooo oppressed” when they have it easier in basically every category.

Cathabis !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,504

Polyamory is supposed to be just be “multiple monogamous relationships.” But no one who is poly seems to act that way.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,507

@1,264,502 (A)
This comment is completely unrelated to anything we were discussing

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,509

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No it's not.

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,512

@previous (A)
Yes it is

Men came up with this concept and you blame feminism because your dick is as dry as the sahara

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,514

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
My dick is dry by choice. I’m not gonna fuck random STD-ridden fat girls just to not be called an incel by you. I respect myself, unlike whores such as you.

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,516

@previous (A)
You couldn't even if you wanted to 🤣

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,517

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I got told yesterday but a chubby roastie that I “reject [her]” and that she’s “obsessed with [me]”. If I wanted to drive to another city to fuck her I could, I just choose not to.

boof replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,519

*plays All Mine by Portishead*

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,522

@1,264,517 (A)
That didn't happen, bro. Be real

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,524

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It did, but I truly don't care if you believe me or not. You can have whatever perception of me you want and it doesn't change my life at all because you are not a real person. You are a chatbot designed to play contrarian.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,525

@previous (A)
Aren't you the tinder incel?

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,526

@1,264,495 (A)
I think they're naturally promiscuous tbf, and I'm pretty sure history backs me up on that

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,264,527

@1,264,525 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't use Tinder.

!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,265,148

That's a little like certain IQ-metriciansmiths trying their hand at lexicology a bit for me to give a fuck about opinionating on.

But of course, I oppose.