Topic: Go on then, ban me.
Green !BEERiVqJJw started this discussion 1 year ago #114,045
Seeing as most users here want me banned now, go ahead and ban me mods/admin. 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, I don't care.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,262,358
No, we want you to voluntarily take a step back and think about what you've said. No one can force you to fix what's wrong in your head.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,363
I dont want you banned
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,366
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No one does. But he needs to seriously re-think his viewpoint because he's on the wrong side of history. He's taken breaks before and come back better for it. It seems to be necessary for him to approach things with a sober mind figuratively, if not liberally.
No one does. But he needs to seriously re-think his viewpoint because he's on the wrong side of history. He's taken breaks before and come back better for it. It seems to be necessary for him to approach things with a sober mind figuratively, if not liberally.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 47 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,367
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 second later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,368
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 6 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,369
I meant to say "if not literally", but I think the wording I wrote works too.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 25 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,370
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 24 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,372
How the hell did my name end up getting dropped in that thread when I've had nothing at all to do with the drama?
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 5 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,373
@1,262,366 (B)
> he needs to seriously re-think his viewpoint because he's on the wrong side of history.
What an arrogant thing to say.
> he needs to seriously re-think his viewpoint because he's on the wrong side of history.
What an arrogant thing to say.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 32 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,374
@1,262,368 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
This is not trolling. Green is way out of line with this. We're are talking about people dying here and a modern day genocide. That's where I draw the line and I'm sad to see that's where green doesn't. I find this unacceptable and so should you.
This is not trolling. Green is way out of line with this. We're are talking about people dying here and a modern day genocide. That's where I draw the line and I'm sad to see that's where green doesn't. I find this unacceptable and so should you.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 2 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,375
@1,262,372 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
How do you feel about the 13 year old girl in The Exorcist: Believer being dragged to hell by demons through no fault of her own?
How do you feel about the 13 year old girl in The Exorcist: Believer being dragged to hell by demons through no fault of her own?
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg double-posted this 1 year ago, 30 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,376
@1,262,374 (B)
You need to go away, troll. you are being very unkind and aggressive, and it is very much not appreciated.
You need to go away, troll. you are being very unkind and aggressive, and it is very much not appreciated.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,377
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
I am not being unkind and, despite my best judgement, I am suggesting green come back after he gets whatever is wrong with him sorted. I am telling him what he needs to hear. To do otherwise would be unkind.
I am not being unkind and, despite my best judgement, I am suggesting green come back after he gets whatever is wrong with him sorted. I am telling him what he needs to hear. To do otherwise would be unkind.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 1 second later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,378
@1,262,370 (B)
> Yes there is.
Opinions are like buttholes. Everyone's got one. Mostly they stink. That's no reason to tell somebody to fuck off / call for their ban.
Instead of telling him he's wrong, covering your ears and going lalala, why not have a discussion? Maybe you'll end up learning something.
> Yes there is.
Opinions are like buttholes. Everyone's got one. Mostly they stink. That's no reason to tell somebody to fuck off / call for their ban.
Instead of telling him he's wrong, covering your ears and going lalala, why not have a discussion? Maybe you'll end up learning something.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 38 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,379
@1,262,377 (B)
It is not your place to decide that. You are taking advantage of his kindness. You need to stop, now.
It is not your place to decide that. You are taking advantage of his kindness. You need to stop, now.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 31 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,380
@1,262,378 (D)
Not all opinions are equal. Supporting genocide is one of those that definitely is not.
Not all opinions are equal. Supporting genocide is one of those that definitely is not.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,381
@previous (B)
> Not all opinions are equal. Supporting genocide is one of those that definitely is not.
Let's start with that - are you talking about genocide perpetrated by Hamas or Israel or both or neither?
> Not all opinions are equal. Supporting genocide is one of those that definitely is not.
Let's start with that - are you talking about genocide perpetrated by Hamas or Israel or both or neither?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 50 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,383
@1,262,379 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
There has been nothing kind about what green has said. If you're not willing to stand up for what you believe in, then why start now with me? The only difference is I'm not a named user and have no reputation here. There's no stigma against what you're saying to me. You go after the weak. You're a predator, pure and simple. Not only with this, but also sexually as you did with a small child that used to post here. Fuck off.
There has been nothing kind about what green has said. If you're not willing to stand up for what you believe in, then why start now with me? The only difference is I'm not a named user and have no reputation here. There's no stigma against what you're saying to me. You go after the weak. You're a predator, pure and simple. Not only with this, but also sexually as you did with a small child that used to post here. Fuck off.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 41 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,384
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,385
@1,262,383 (B)
It is obvious that you are pretending to care in order to hurt Green. Stop. Also, I have never sexually gone after a small child.
It is obvious that you are pretending to care in order to hurt Green. Stop. Also, I have never sexually gone after a small child.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,393
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 49 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,394
> no poll
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,396
@1,262,393 (B)
I discredited nothing. You are a cruel troll hurting a sensitive soul, and you need to stop, now.
I discredited nothing. You are a cruel troll hurting a sensitive soul, and you need to stop, now.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 51 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,418
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
You did. You're a joke, dude. Also, I'm not a troll, but that's irrelevant anyway. Address the argument, not the person. The fact that Green couldn't do that is what led to him attacking kook and helped lead to where we are here. That and him being a genocidal sociopath.
You did. You're a joke, dude. Also, I'm not a troll, but that's irrelevant anyway. Address the argument, not the person. The fact that Green couldn't do that is what led to him attacking kook and helped lead to where we are here. That and him being a genocidal sociopath.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,424
@previous (B)
> The fact that Green couldn't do that is what led to him attacking kook and helped lead to where we are here. That and him being a genocidal sociopath.
Stop with this you idiot.
> The fact that Green couldn't do that is what led to him attacking kook and helped lead to where we are here. That and him being a genocidal sociopath.
Stop with this you idiot.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,426
@1,262,418 (B)
I did no such thing. Again, you must think I am someone else. And you need to leave Green alone.
I did no such thing. Again, you must think I am someone else. And you need to leave Green alone.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,427
dj nata de coco joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,428
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,429
@1,262,426 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
You're right at the door of 50 years and you're still following the same boring conversational scripts you've been following for the past 30. What a weird and sad existence.
You're right at the door of 50 years and you're still following the same boring conversational scripts you've been following for the past 30. What a weird and sad existence.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,431
@1,262,426 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
> I did no such thing. Again, you must think I am someone else. And you need to leave Green alone.
Calm down Matt.
> I did no such thing. Again, you must think I am someone else. And you need to leave Green alone.
Calm down Matt.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 47 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,436
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg double-posted this 1 year ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,438
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,440
@1,262,436 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Yes you are. Do you think there will ever be a point in your life where you move beyond this basic conversational script? Or do you anticipate doing this until the day you die?
Yes you are. Do you think there will ever be a point in your life where you move beyond this basic conversational script? Or do you anticipate doing this until the day you die?
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,445
@previous (B)
I genuinely am not. I am sure that the moderators can verify this. Just for the record, what is your evidence that I am Matt?
I genuinely am not. I am sure that the moderators can verify this. Just for the record, what is your evidence that I am Matt?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,447
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,448
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,450
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,453
@1,262,445 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Surely you will agree that, if the mods come and check and you are NOT Matt, that Anonymous B will make an formal apology to you. But that if the mods check and you ARE Matt, that you have to make a formal apology to the entire forum for lying. Do you agree?
Surely you will agree that, if the mods come and check and you are NOT Matt, that Anonymous B will make an formal apology to you. But that if the mods check and you ARE Matt, that you have to make a formal apology to the entire forum for lying. Do you agree?
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,455
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,457
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,460
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,461
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
That's an odd comment to make. Why did you assume I was suggesting you did?
That's an odd comment to make. Why did you assume I was suggesting you did?
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,463
@1,262,455 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
If a formal apology is not to your liking, perhaps you'll agree that you'll be banned for 69 days if the mods come to the conclusion that you ARE Matt? Since you yourself say that you are NOT Matt, I think that you should be comfortable going ahead with this condition.
If a formal apology is not to your liking, perhaps you'll agree that you'll be banned for 69 days if the mods come to the conclusion that you ARE Matt? Since you yourself say that you are NOT Matt, I think that you should be comfortable going ahead with this condition.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,466
@1,262,461 (B)
@previous (G)
Good Lord lol you two are so argumentative and particular. No, I don't agree to any formal nonsense. If I'm not Matt, which I'm not, that will be enough for me.
@previous (G)
Good Lord lol you two are so argumentative and particular. No, I don't agree to any formal nonsense. If I'm not Matt, which I'm not, that will be enough for me.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,467
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Thanks for confirming you're Matt. See? I knew I didn't have to flash my mod credentials to make it obvious to everyone. You did that job for me.
Thanks for confirming you're Matt. See? I knew I didn't have to flash my mod credentials to make it obvious to everyone. You did that job for me.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,468
@previous (B)
I am, not Matt, and I doubt you're a mod. I'm not going to continue this silly conversation. Have a good day.
I am, not Matt, and I doubt you're a mod. I'm not going to continue this silly conversation. Have a good day.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,469
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Bye. Don't come back until you're ready to accept Anon G's deal. We'd all love to have yet another excuse to ban you. Just give us a reason.
Bye. Don't come back until you're ready to accept Anon G's deal. We'd all love to have yet another excuse to ban you. Just give us a reason.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 42 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,471
@1,262,466 (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
There's no need for formality, simply indicate your acceptance of the terms which I shall repeat:
If you ARE Matt then you will be banned for 69 days as punishment for lying
If you ARE NOT Matt then Anon B must sincerely apologize to you for accusing you of being Matt.
There's no need for formality, simply indicate your acceptance of the terms which I shall repeat:
If you ARE Matt then you will be banned for 69 days as punishment for lying
If you ARE NOT Matt then Anon B must sincerely apologize to you for accusing you of being Matt.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,472
@previous (G)
Hardly a fair, balanced deal lol. How about this. If I am NOT Matt, YOU get banned for 69 days. Deal?
Hardly a fair, balanced deal lol. How about this. If I am NOT Matt, YOU get banned for 69 days. Deal?
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,473
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
I don't have any skin in this game. But you're the one who refused to apologize if you ARE Matt. What else is there?
Of course, it's irrelevant to you what would happen if you ARE Matt because, as you have repeatedly said, you are NOT Matt. Why do you have a problem with the punishment if you ARE Matt if you are NOT Matt?
I don't have any skin in this game. But you're the one who refused to apologize if you ARE Matt. What else is there?
Of course, it's irrelevant to you what would happen if you ARE Matt because, as you have repeatedly said, you are NOT Matt. Why do you have a problem with the punishment if you ARE Matt if you are NOT Matt?
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,474
@previous (G)
For someone with "no skin this this game", you are making dozens of frantic posts about it. lol
For someone with "no skin this this game", you are making dozens of frantic posts about it. lol
Anonymous G replied with this 1 year ago, 50 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,475
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Not really, I'm just responding normally to you. But it seems there is a lot of controversy over your identity. Don't you want to settle it once and for all?
Not really, I'm just responding normally to you. But it seems there is a lot of controversy over your identity. Don't you want to settle it once and for all?
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,476
@previous (G)
I am not Matt. I am sure the moderators will verify this. You are much too interested in this for sanity. I am going now. Have a great night or day, wherever you may be!
I am not Matt. I am sure the moderators will verify this. You are much too interested in this for sanity. I am going now. Have a great night or day, wherever you may be!
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 25 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,478
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
Multiple moderators, myself included, have already verified that you are Matt. It's time for you to apologize.
Multiple moderators, myself included, have already verified that you are Matt. It's time for you to apologize.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,479
@previous (B)
I do not believe that you are a moderator. Please prove it by posting with your underlined moderator name.
I do not believe that you are a moderator. Please prove it by posting with your underlined moderator name.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,482
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)
As I said, I have nothing to prove to you. This conversation is between me and you. Anyone else can believe what they will, but between the two of us, we both know who you are. I don't need to prove that to you.
As I said, I have nothing to prove to you. This conversation is between me and you. Anyone else can believe what they will, but between the two of us, we both know who you are. I don't need to prove that to you.
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 19 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,483
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,484
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,486
Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,487
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,516
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg)You've already been outed by a mod Matt. Now we shall get the 69 day ban on the roll.
> NB4 Meta is just targeting me because he enjoys doing mod abuse
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,518
@1,262,418 (B)
I take exception to this. I think the IDF is going too far if they are killing citizens, that is wrong. But Hamas are the ones that want a genocide as they only want the annihilation of all Jewish people. Wanting an entire race exterminated IS genocide. I believe a peaceful deal between Palestine and Israel should be reached.
@previous (I)
Meta shouldn't be mod abusing. Indy is one of the best posters here.
I take exception to this. I think the IDF is going too far if they are killing citizens, that is wrong. But Hamas are the ones that want a genocide as they only want the annihilation of all Jewish people. Wanting an entire race exterminated IS genocide. I believe a peaceful deal between Palestine and Israel should be reached.
@previous (I)
Meta shouldn't be mod abusing. Indy is one of the best posters here.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,520
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
> Meta shouldn't be mod abusing. Indy is one of the best posters here.
So even you know Matt is posting as Throckmorton? Thanks, that will be all.
Also, why 2 different trip codes?
> Meta shouldn't be mod abusing. Indy is one of the best posters here.
So even you know Matt is posting as Throckmorton? Thanks, that will be all.
Also, why 2 different trip codes?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,523
@1,262,516 (I)
Thanks for adding that big red arrow. Otherwise there is no way I could've understood that image.
Thanks for adding that big red arrow. Otherwise there is no way I could've understood that image.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,524
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,525
@1,262,520 (I)
No, I do not know that. Meta has been mod abusing for a while due to a personal vendetta against Indy. It won't be long before he accuses me of being Indy either.
No, I do not know that. Meta has been mod abusing for a while due to a personal vendetta against Indy. It won't be long before he accuses me of being Indy either.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,528
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
> It won't be long before he accuses me of being Indy either.
So, Meta, the "mod abuser", will accuse anyone of being Matt?
Funny, he's never accused me of being Matt.
> It won't be long before he accuses me of being Indy either.
So, Meta, the "mod abuser", will accuse anyone of being Matt?
Funny, he's never accused me of being Matt.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,530
@1,262,525 (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
It's not a vendetta, it's called "mowing the grass". The idea is that if Meta keeps a constant, low-level pressure on Matt, he will never gather the strength and courage for a major schtick attack. Just like how regularly mowing your lawn stops your grass from becoming overgrown. And it works, it absolutely works.
It's not a vendetta, it's called "mowing the grass". The idea is that if Meta keeps a constant, low-level pressure on Matt, he will never gather the strength and courage for a major schtick attack. Just like how regularly mowing your lawn stops your grass from becoming overgrown. And it works, it absolutely works.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,607
Hamas seems to be one of those entities that would be absolutely tyrannical and creates and exploits a death cult to do its actions.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,608
@previous (boof)
> Hamas seems to be one of those entities that would be absolutely tyrannical and creates and exploits a death cult to do its actions.
100%
> Hamas seems to be one of those entities that would be absolutely tyrannical and creates and exploits a death cult to do its actions.
100%
boof replied with this 1 year ago, 17 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,618
and of course it is also true that Netenyahu is a corrupt piece of shit who would turn his free state to fascism to avoid successful prosecution.
dj nata de caca replied with this 1 year ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,723
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,725
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,727
@1,262,518 (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
You seem to be doing a classic whataboutism. You need to make a clear statement against the genocide being perpetuated by Israel and to make a formal apology, not only to this community, but also generally to all the families that have lost children and loved ones to racially-targeted violence. Don't bother responding, or posting at all really, until you've done all the above.
You seem to be doing a classic whataboutism. You need to make a clear statement against the genocide being perpetuated by Israel and to make a formal apology, not only to this community, but also generally to all the families that have lost children and loved ones to racially-targeted violence. Don't bother responding, or posting at all really, until you've done all the above.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,734
@previous (B)
> the genocide being perpetuated by
Israel
Hamas
ftfy
> Don't bother responding, or posting at all really, until you've done all the above.
Woo, look at you, Mr Internet tough guy keyboard dictator.
> the genocide being perpetuated by
Hamas
ftfy
> Don't bother responding, or posting at all really, until you've done all the above.
Woo, look at you, Mr Internet tough guy keyboard dictator.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,737
@previous (D)
> ftfy
No you didn't.
> Woo, look at you, Mr Internet tough guy keyboard dictator.
He can do what he pleases. But he shouldn't expect to be well-received around here anymore. That time has passed.
> ftfy
No you didn't.
> Woo, look at you, Mr Internet tough guy keyboard dictator.
He can do what he pleases. But he shouldn't expect to be well-received around here anymore. That time has passed.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,738
Also the autism and mental illness card has been played out. Time for him to seek help and take responsibility for his own revolting actions and words.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,739
@previous (B)
> Also the autism and mental illness card has been played out. Time for him to seek help and take responsibility for his own revolting actions and words.
Here's some life advice for you, tough guy: Nobody likes a bully. You carry on talking like this and treating people in this way, you are going to wind up alone and miserable. You need to take a big step back and examine your own words and actions before condemning and dictating to others.
> Also the autism and mental illness card has been played out. Time for him to seek help and take responsibility for his own revolting actions and words.
Here's some life advice for you, tough guy: Nobody likes a bully. You carry on talking like this and treating people in this way, you are going to wind up alone and miserable. You need to take a big step back and examine your own words and actions before condemning and dictating to others.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,747
@previous (D)
Take your own advice. Enabling his mental illness like you are doing is bullying him. Try thinking about Green's best interest for once, rather than yours. Calling someone out when they need to be called out isn't the easy path. It isn't even a pleasant one. But it is the high road and it's the road you are deliberately not taking.
Take your own advice. Enabling his mental illness like you are doing is bullying him. Try thinking about Green's best interest for once, rather than yours. Calling someone out when they need to be called out isn't the easy path. It isn't even a pleasant one. But it is the high road and it's the road you are deliberately not taking.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,775
@1,262,727 (B)
I'm listening to the radio now and a lady is speaking about the atrocities committed to the Israeli people by Hamas, so you can sincerely bore off. The atrocities committed by both sides is wrong. I've said this and I'm not apologising as I've said nothing wrong.
@previous (B)
If you were thinking about my best interest you would leave me alone and stop being a bully troll. You know exactly what you're doing.
@1,262,738 (B)
What revolting words? Cite the specific posts.
I'm listening to the radio now and a lady is speaking about the atrocities committed to the Israeli people by Hamas, so you can sincerely bore off. The atrocities committed by both sides is wrong. I've said this and I'm not apologising as I've said nothing wrong.
@previous (B)
If you were thinking about my best interest you would leave me alone and stop being a bully troll. You know exactly what you're doing.
@1,262,738 (B)
What revolting words? Cite the specific posts.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,776
Also stop the BS "concern" trolling.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,777
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
I hope you've accepted by now that Anon B is not me, as you thought it was.
I hope you've accepted by now that Anon B is not me, as you thought it was.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,778
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) double-posted this 1 year ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,787
But you know what, Anon B is right. I should take a break from here because the troll/s just won't leave me alone. I know some of you will say I should stay, but they've won. I'm sick of this. I know I've said this before but don't expect me to post for a few months or so. Squeegee was right, the trolls won't stop. When I return I'll only be posting on this trip which I have securely written down now. Anyone posting who isn't posting on this trip isn't me. I hope the situation on this site improves in a few months but I don't hold out any hope. Kook, Matt and ninjj, despite our disagreements recently I love you all. I'll drop in on the discord now and then. Peace out ✌️
Anonymous B replied with this 1 year ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,262,818
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
If you are being serious, then I wish you well. I hope when you return the dust will have settled and you will have had enough time to reflect truly and deeply on the position you've taken on recent events RE: Israel and Gaza. I look forward to reading your apology so we can return to the light-hearted banter and fun we've all had and know you can have. While I can't be certain how others will respond -- they may not be so generous -- I suspect I'll have no difficulty forgiving you when that day comes.
But until then, you know what the expression is: don't shoot the messenger. It's a Crown offence.
If you are being serious, then I wish you well. I hope when you return the dust will have settled and you will have had enough time to reflect truly and deeply on the position you've taken on recent events RE: Israel and Gaza. I look forward to reading your apology so we can return to the light-hearted banter and fun we've all had and know you can have. While I can't be certain how others will respond -- they may not be so generous -- I suspect I'll have no difficulty forgiving you when that day comes.
But until then, you know what the expression is: don't shoot the messenger. It's a Crown offence.
Green joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,263,110
My sissy balls are the size of tic tacs. Boo Hoo Hoo.
Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,263,397
You're slightly less retarded than me, and exceed the curve of the Pakistanocracy in White-dargouric racial clothing predominance who control now the region here. Uhm, do you really warrant it?