Throckpooton joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,262,316
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Let's come back to this thread in a few weeks' time when the truth will hopefully have come out. I have a feeling you won't be so confident.
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,262,397
@1,262,389 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) > Please show us the evidence
I posted a video in another thread of somebody analysing the video footage of the one bomb claimed to have been an air strike frame by frame. Use your own eyes, please. It is CLEARLY not an airstrike ffs. Do you think any of those other cars on the road would still have been there.
If you can produce an actual video of an actual airstrike deliberately targeting civilians, I promise you, I will eat my words and humbly apologise to you. Are you willing to do the same when it turns out that what I'm saying here is true?
@previous (Throckmorton !dxiFV8kfVg) > Isn't there video of the air strike on them?
No, there isn't. Because there was none.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,262,399
Don't let troll Anonymous J bamboozle you with his evil ways. Note how insistent he is that his opponents are arguing that there was, specifically, an air strike. That's his bait, and anybody who chooses to engage on that point will be hooked on that bait.
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,262,408
@1,262,404 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) > Because that's what people were claiming though. I cant control that
Yes, just as I can't control what people are saying about airstrikes. Again, it's for max sensationalism.
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,262,413
@1,262,410 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) > His analysis > > Skip to 4 minutes > > 1. Hamas has used human shield in the past > > 2. Hamas has shot missles from civilian areas > > 3. Claims that Hamas doesn't want them to leave re human shields > > 4. Claims it can't be aerial bomb because the cars at the explosion site don't have broken windows > > 5. Claims it looks like a car bomb, therefore it can't be IDF military caused
What's the most likely explanation, given this analysis, or if you like, ignoring his analysis and going by the video frames which show the start of the explosion?
- airstrike
- not an airstrike
And, if not an airstrike, but still perpetrated by the IDF, how did they manage to get the bomb/soldiers/helicopter there if they had not begun their land invasion?
Or
Is it more likely that Hamas did this, given that they still controlled the area?
Can you at least agree that there is SOME chance this was not an IDF bomb? - I'll take that.