Topic: send everybody back where they came from
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #113,615
except natives i guess and czechs who are decent folks and socialists who want to actually help ppl
everybody else is a pos and can fuck right off
whites to europe, blacks to africa
problems solved.
everybody else is a pos and can fuck right off
whites to europe, blacks to africa
problems solved.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later[^] [v] #1,258,081
Especially the European colonizers. I agree!
dj coco nutty joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,089
where does that put Latinos
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,099
Native Americans should go back to Asia then.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,108
dj coco nutty replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,110
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,146
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,173
So, all humans should return to Western Africa?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,175
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,177
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,180
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,181
@previous (D)
Civilisation began in Mesopotamia, but humankind began in Africa. Read science. Thanks.
Civilisation began in Mesopotamia, but humankind began in Africa. Read science. Thanks.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,183
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,185
@previous (D)
Because the scientific method seems like the most accurate way to learn about the universe around us.
Because the scientific method seems like the most accurate way to learn about the universe around us.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,186
@previous (B)
Seems to me that it requires a lot more faith. You don't know the intricities of every scientific method.
Seems to me that it requires a lot more faith. You don't know the intricities of every scientific method.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,187
@previous (D)
I know the scientific method and how it works. You, contrarily, based your beliefs on "a 5,000 year old book says so."
I know the scientific method and how it works. You, contrarily, based your beliefs on "a 5,000 year old book says so."
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 36 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,192
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,193
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,196
@previous (B)
What do you mean prove it? It's been proven already, that's why there are like 2 billion believers in the world. Do you think all those people are just wrong?
What do you mean prove it? It's been proven already, that's why there are like 2 billion believers in the world. Do you think all those people are just wrong?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,198
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 26 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,199
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,200
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,339
@1,258,192 (D)
> The book was written from eyewitness accounts, retard.
How were human eyewitnesses present to witness the creation of mankind? You're confusing the new testament for the torah. Your religion teaches that the torah existed before the Universe, and was the blueprint for its creation.
> The book was written from eyewitness accounts, retard.
How were human eyewitnesses present to witness the creation of mankind? You're confusing the new testament for the torah. Your religion teaches that the torah existed before the Universe, and was the blueprint for its creation.
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,379
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,446
@1,258,180 (D)
Genesis 2 tells the account of Adam and Eve who were the first humans in Eden, but the later story of Cane and Abel show that there were already other humans living elsewhere.
Genesis 2 tells the account of Adam and Eve who were the first humans in Eden, but the later story of Cane and Abel show that there were already other humans living elsewhere.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,482
@1,258,173 (B)
> So, all humans should return to Western Africa?
It's actually a little more interesting than that. The oldest anatomically modern human fossils don't appear clustered in any specific region of the continent. There have been some found in Morocco, Ethiopia, and all the way south as South Africa in roughly the same period. It seems we emerged as a species while having contact and travel over the whole range of Africa.
Why or how we broke off as a separate species from other hominids while living in presumably overlapping geographic regions is a mystery, at least to me.
> So, all humans should return to Western Africa?
It's actually a little more interesting than that. The oldest anatomically modern human fossils don't appear clustered in any specific region of the continent. There have been some found in Morocco, Ethiopia, and all the way south as South Africa in roughly the same period. It seems we emerged as a species while having contact and travel over the whole range of Africa.
Why or how we broke off as a separate species from other hominids while living in presumably overlapping geographic regions is a mystery, at least to me.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,258,486
I'm reminded of the concept of divergent evolution. I guess that'd be the presumed answer to what I mentioned in my previous post. Maybe it's just a different way of framing the same question though. What would've caused us to diverge from other hominids? What would've selected against our more ape-human hybrid-like ancestors and what was that niche that we (and other apes, chimps, etc) ended up filling that they couldn't?
(Edited 1 minute later.)