Topic: There is a protest in London over the banning of bully XLs
Erik !saAqdaazn2 started this discussion 2 years ago #113,578
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12552529/XL-Bully-owners-protest-London-against-Rishi-Sunaks-ban-beloved-pets-series-vicious-attacks-leave-dogs-home.html
And of course all the protesters are estate chavs who's bully wouldn't hurt a fly until it does.
And of course all the protesters are estate chavs who's bully wouldn't hurt a fly until it does.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 58 seconds later[^] [v] #1,257,692
You could go down there and shit yourself as a form of counter-protest.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,694
I remember reading they banned pit bulls in Canada (or maybe just Toronto IDK) and the owners got around it by just not calling their dogs "pit bulls" any more.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,697
if it is even physically capable of tearing out your junk, why is it in your house
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,707
@1,257,694 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
They were banned for stupid reasons so it's only fitting people got around the ban for stupid reasons.
They were banned for stupid reasons so it's only fitting people got around the ban for stupid reasons.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 44 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,708
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago, 41 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,715
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,717
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
There's no commonly accepted definition of what is and is not a pit bull. So everyone that's into dog fights, putting spike collars on their dogs, and all that other shit will just call their dog a pit bull even if their dog is only scarcely related to a terrier at all. Then on the other end you have people that aren't into all that and they'll identify their dog as one of the literally dozen other names for nearly identical looking terriers. Guess which dogs get counted in the dog bite statistics and which don't? Guess which dogs are socialized to be aggressive and which aren't?
The definition has become so useless that it's basically like calling your dog dangerous. They ought to just pass legislation banning "dangerous" dogs.
Maybe we should just ban total shitheads from owning dogs instead. What an idea.
There's no commonly accepted definition of what is and is not a pit bull. So everyone that's into dog fights, putting spike collars on their dogs, and all that other shit will just call their dog a pit bull even if their dog is only scarcely related to a terrier at all. Then on the other end you have people that aren't into all that and they'll identify their dog as one of the literally dozen other names for nearly identical looking terriers. Guess which dogs get counted in the dog bite statistics and which don't? Guess which dogs are socialized to be aggressive and which aren't?
The definition has become so useless that it's basically like calling your dog dangerous. They ought to just pass legislation banning "dangerous" dogs.
Maybe we should just ban total shitheads from owning dogs instead. What an idea.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,721
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,723
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 50 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,730
@1,257,717 (E)
> There's no commonly accepted definition of what is and is not a pit bull.
That's not true. Certain kennel clubs wouldn't allow them to become a standard breed (in their club), so offshoot clubs were created that do recognize the pitbull.
> There's no commonly accepted definition of what is and is not a pit bull.
That's not true. Certain kennel clubs wouldn't allow them to become a standard breed (in their club), so offshoot clubs were created that do recognize the pitbull.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,731
@1,257,717 (E)
Terrier was bred in to give bull dogs gameyness
They also have breed standards like any other dog
Terrier was bred in to give bull dogs gameyness
They also have breed standards like any other dog
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,733
@1,257,717 (E)
Also the fact that you don't know how fighting dogs were created and also the "related to a terrier" comment makes me think you've done no research on this whatsoever
Why speak so confidently on sonething you haven't looked into?
Also don't you know that dogs are bred to have beneficial traits for certain jobs? Even fighting dogs
Also the fact that you don't know how fighting dogs were created and also the "related to a terrier" comment makes me think you've done no research on this whatsoever
Why speak so confidently on sonething you haven't looked into?
Also don't you know that dogs are bred to have beneficial traits for certain jobs? Even fighting dogs
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,738
@1,257,730 (F)
@1,257,731 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
There are no genetic tests to determine whether or not a dog is a pit bull. The whole thing is bullshit.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You sound like you don't know anything about dogs, yet still hold strong views on the matter. Sounds like how you are with just about every subject lmao.
@1,257,731 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
There are no genetic tests to determine whether or not a dog is a pit bull. The whole thing is bullshit.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You sound like you don't know anything about dogs, yet still hold strong views on the matter. Sounds like how you are with just about every subject lmao.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,740
@previous (E)
Maybe they're not widely available because there's not much of a market for a pitbull test. They could make one.
Maybe they're not widely available because there's not much of a market for a pitbull test. They could make one.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,741
@1,257,738 (E)
There are genetic tests to determine dog breeds
And you clearly haven't researched this at all
There are genetic tests to determine dog breeds
And you clearly haven't researched this at all
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 54 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,742
@1,257,738 (E)
https://www.wisdompanel.com/en-us/blog/detecting-american-pit-bull-terrier
Oh wow, look what 30 seconds on Google bring us...
https://www.wisdompanel.com/en-us/blog/detecting-american-pit-bull-terrier
Oh wow, look what 30 seconds on Google bring us...
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,743
@1,257,740 (F)
@1,257,741 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@previous (F)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107223/
@1,257,741 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@previous (F)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6107223/
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,744
Kill all of these dogs and their owners as well. 🤠
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,745
It must be weird living your life and absorbing all your views of the world from reddit and other meme issues. You're really living the meme, kook.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,746
@1,257,744 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
The owners of poorly raised dogs deserve the dogs that they own. We should send them with their dogs off to a large remote island as punishment.
The owners of poorly raised dogs deserve the dogs that they own. We should send them with their dogs off to a large remote island as punishment.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,747
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,748
@1,257,743 (E)
This shows that shelter workers are poor at recognizing breed types
There are many physical traits the fighting dogs were bred to have. People arent grabbing random breeds and turning them into fight dogs
This shows that shelter workers are poor at recognizing breed types
There are many physical traits the fighting dogs were bred to have. People arent grabbing random breeds and turning them into fight dogs
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 53 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,750
For instance, why aren't the largest breeds of dogs used to fight?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,752
When asked why people won't bring their xl pits to the protest she responds "we aren't scared they'll hurt humans, we're scared humans will hurt them" haha okay lady
https://youtu.be/UfxsIKMRDIc?si=4PVIkPa2wGPDcG6z
https://youtu.be/UfxsIKMRDIc?si=4PVIkPa2wGPDcG6z
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 31 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,759
@1,257,747 (F)
@1,257,748 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,257,750 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Courts have ruled that genetic identification is not required and that a person of "ordinary intelligence" can determine whether or not a dog is a pit bull. Yet studies show otherwise.
@1,257,748 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,257,750 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Courts have ruled that genetic identification is not required and that a person of "ordinary intelligence" can determine whether or not a dog is a pit bull. Yet studies show otherwise.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 28 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,760
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,762
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,763
@1,257,759 (E)
I don't know about the US etc., but I think in the UK our breed-specific legislation actually explicitly says it comes down to whether a dog resembles a banned breed well enough.
I don't know about the US etc., but I think in the UK our breed-specific legislation actually explicitly says it comes down to whether a dog resembles a banned breed well enough.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,764
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,765
Anonymous I double-posted this 2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,766
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,767
@1,257,765 (I)
https://www.gov.uk/control-dog-public/banned-dogs
Whether your dog is a banned type depends on what it looks like, rather than its breed or name.
For example, if your dog matches many of the characteristics of a Pit Bull Terrier, it may be a banned type.
For example, if your dog matches many of the characteristics of a Pit Bull Terrier, it may be a banned type.
https://www.gov.uk/control-dog-public/banned-dogs
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,768
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
the actual law says otherwise. I suggest you read it. Again, why chime in when you don't know what you're talking about?
the actual law says otherwise. I suggest you read it. Again, why chime in when you don't know what you're talking about?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,769
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,770
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,771
@1,257,760 (E)
Also you're the one who believes people grab random dogs to make into fighters, which is absurd
Also you're the one who believes people grab random dogs to make into fighters, which is absurd
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,772
@1,257,763 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Highly subjective and open to interpretation: what more could you want from a piece of legislation?
Highly subjective and open to interpretation: what more could you want from a piece of legislation?
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,773
@1,257,770 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Studies show otherwise.
@1,257,771 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You seem to know more about my beliefs than I do lol
Studies show otherwise.
@1,257,771 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You seem to know more about my beliefs than I do lol
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,774
@previous (E)
You said people will grab a dog and call it a pitbull because they want to fight it
When in reality, they breed dogs to have traits that make them better fighters and call those pitbulls
And that's how they've always done it
You said people will grab a dog and call it a pitbull because they want to fight it
When in reality, they breed dogs to have traits that make them better fighters and call those pitbulls
And that's how they've always done it
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,775
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You said people will grab a dog and call it a pitbull because they want to fight it
Yes. Or more often to just appear macho or tough.
> When in reality, they breed dogs to have traits that make them better fighters and call those pitbulls
Both can be true. One can true and one can be false. Neither can be true. It's a whole different discussion.
It looks like there are roughly 35 deaths in the USA per year from dog attacks. This is similar to the number who die by lightning strike per year.
Sounds like a lot of hysterics about a lot of nothing. All the more reason for you to have an incredibly strong view on the matter like you do here lmao!
> You said people will grab a dog and call it a pitbull because they want to fight it
Yes. Or more often to just appear macho or tough.
> When in reality, they breed dogs to have traits that make them better fighters and call those pitbulls
Both can be true. One can true and one can be false. Neither can be true. It's a whole different discussion.
It looks like there are roughly 35 deaths in the USA per year from dog attacks. This is similar to the number who die by lightning strike per year.
Sounds like a lot of hysterics about a lot of nothing. All the more reason for you to have an incredibly strong view on the matter like you do here lmao!
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,778
@previous (E)
Certain breed traits are associated with being macho or tough because those traits also make dogs good fighters
Certain breed traits are associated with being macho or tough because those traits also make dogs good fighters
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,780
@1,257,775 (E)
> Deaths from dog attacks
Cut off your hand, no big deal right? You didn't die, don't become hysteric. And don't you think that number would be higher if pitbull activists had their way and dogs who had hurt people weren't euthanized?
> Deaths from dog attacks
Cut off your hand, no big deal right? You didn't die, don't become hysteric. And don't you think that number would be higher if pitbull activists had their way and dogs who had hurt people weren't euthanized?
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,781
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,784
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,786
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,810
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,831
boof replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,257,842
@previous (E)
> Still insignificant.
Listen here. Consumer protection authorities have banned shit far less harmful than these fucking face-eating beasts. Hardly anyone was hurt by lawn darts. And those fuckin things only hurt when you throw them in a way that they land on a person.
> Still insignificant.
Listen here. Consumer protection authorities have banned shit far less harmful than these fucking face-eating beasts. Hardly anyone was hurt by lawn darts. And those fuckin things only hurt when you throw them in a way that they land on a person.