Topic: I was racially transitioning into a Korean, and later degradatively at least an Indo-Chinoid, until
!MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 1 year ago#113,559
...'22, and I'm not that tearful that I've lost it because of the North Koreans coming to the country about a year and a half ago to announce new wealth figures and deliberate anti-British economic conspiracy.
Honestly, I'm relieved WE ARE MATERIALLY GETTING POORER even if aggressive Gypsy-lending networks are giving even retards new-registration cars beyond the promise pan-partaially up here that they would stop allowing these people even to eat or anything.
It was a feature added to a metabolically modified version of Pre-Grabalin'' (delvda-delvda).
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,375
@1,257,335 (B)
It will be next. People already believe they can change genders, so this is the next logical step. And people like OP are leading the way. What a world we live in when people like OP are the thought leaders of the day.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 days later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,258,025
@1,257,335 (B)
Non-sense. DNA is essentilaly a sum of pH and post-pH. That DNA can alter is absolutely UNPROVEN but certainly not UNHYPOTHETICAL; if you kill a parent, or both, you erase the proof of compariosn firstly; but if you fail to expose blood to equinanimously equillibrious circumstances, post-conceptal and even pre-conceptal changes in DNA (I'm not necessarily making a time-linearity conceptual course argument here) per elements of cell can be achieved with thungs as simple as herbs and the skins of fucking fruits (a factor of change ingested by the human in question; well-ripened yields may produce a pH alteration beyond the 0-14 range and cause ultravioletation of the pH long enough to degrade original phenotypal condition). You have to be one of these "rote educated" biologists to even entertain such derangedly down's syndromic axae.
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,258,026
@1,257,340 (dj coco nutty)
Wrong M group. That's either any one of the miscegenate European small m' or M1' =/= c for the small group. Japanese DNA is a neurocognitive melanin, and chokes up wih any factoral negrification (read: microcortisolicization via. melanin) of the blood. In itself, it is probably about 5 - 15% more rote-processing inefficient and rote-speedily inefficient at agglomerating non-unique and some unique information.
!MLHqI35Srs triple-posted this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,258,027
@1,257,375 (E)
"Trans-"race has existed since Whites deliberately started injecting themselves with inverse arellepegio in the 1980s to make themselves niggers; then, we had synthesized melanin albeit non-publically (non-encyclopediacally registerably) in the 1990s. In the mid-1990s, codeine metabolites modified with valproite blockers extended compounds of tin and boron were able to cut into DNA to rehaplotypicize and rephenotype Whites into Orientals or vaguely looking Oriental things depending on how ill-suited the White in question.
I think the relevanter question though is the theft of children, by vastly inferior parents, these children baring diseases of non-causal phenotypic inferiority such as racial Whipakistanism. This could easily have been a fate Gillon, Christopher's.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 16 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,258,213
@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
Oh, that just means an M1c-African, or Japanese-African.
There are tonnes of them, as there are mainland Chinese M1C'-Africans (m1c(delvda)-Africans, often known as the "greater-gugoryeo complex" or "greater gugoryeo unsimplex" to Africans). Perhaps slightly more than there are Koreans in fucking gugoryeo.
IQs are relatively dataless and quite annoyingly, but even minor ones who are hardly representative to the group tend to score near or slightly above 100; the problem is that processing speed data is withheld. The few studies with obvious processing speed data, they are quite slow, but not impossibly unlike their competing homeland Africans; even with abuse and limited resources, scores like 93 and 95 aren't unheard of for this index.
The additional problem, responds a Lauretsonian to Lindsay, is that they are terribly neurofeminine for their race cluster and don't even study as far as low-class Whites their material, tending to repeat 8th as opposed to 10th grade over many post-compulsory semesters. Ultra-cheap KFilm is to blame, giving the example "low is okay so long as it is longly endurant." Low-level GCSEism however was successfully crushed with them statistically in the British colonies and it itself in the 2000s.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 days later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,799
@previous (I)
I've been participate to maybe about 2 past forums for this particular debate and we each time simply resolved that the PC is a pseudo-invention.
The internet not being a fixed construct can be redemographicized with moderately minimal effort.
The computer main-unit and that's regardless portability or not of form is never really nationalistically given derivation to a clear component beyond a presumption that CPU matters, that we can't merely conflate GPU, that neither aren't neither wrong (my view), that cultural output on these devices being exceptionalist isn't more of an achievement (somewhat my view).
Tbe computer is STEREOTYPICALLY at least ascribed the Shemitoid but even that's a massive group (~200 million global people, about 40 or 50 million global diaspora the Ashkenazim); Ashkenazi exclucivism can be drawn like can it fuck. No. lol
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 1 year ago, 51 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,810
@previous (K)
Not unmicrowaved. YES WHEN MICROWAVED (and ideally whilst burning, the only state in which vitamin K is motile enough). Otherwise, wut? lol
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,811
@1,258,809 (K)
Re-reading my posts; it is actually thought to be the tin and boron compound ratios in pregabalinergic compounds responsible (itself a pseudo-drug of about 42 compounds) activating an erasure of original phenotype and the imposition of haplotype Mx'x; sadly it also results with a huge sub-list marquee of warning outcomes such as Ainu, Japanese, Chinese, Cambode, H'm*, etc.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,818
@previous (K)
Its' a waste of time as a method for much other than vitamin K preservation. Otherwise, bananas are a pretty toxic food; their B6 content are too high, and anything pro-opoidergic of them ceases being the case after the growing season decreases emphasis of fertilizer for anything not seen in a codeine compound. You know about 3/4 of these principles at GCSE/old, anyway, S-Grade Chemistry, and actually, abolut 3, even what I left with, minus.
Essentially, 7th grade science is all this is to me until the subject ceases becoming about Koreans or vitamin K preservation; bananas are a pretty fascinating thing for what of "emergency no-opoid cover" they can make as Explicit Seretonin Eliminators.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,821
@previous (K)
Just buy PANADOL/PANAMOL. There's a 20% incidence on that of accidental rephenotypicization. This is compared to 10% on fruited methods (I'm rounding this lazily; its' a high-ish single-digit number with statistical implications pointing this to be somewhat rarer).
Is that 10% every time, or as a weighted average if I microwave so many bananas a day? I feel like a bunch of bananas is cheaper than PANADOL/PANAMOL and if it has 50% efficaciousness then it's a good value for money.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,826
@previous (K)
Activating an opoid receptor is more closely linked to creating mongoloid bone that is beneath the skin level than is linked any factor coincidating a banana akinly to a codeine. Think about causal factors here; a bananas' opoid-aversiveness, which it is more often because of a thing called digestion, is why you're as well to get high and hope R'x deletion occurs because of the usual shift of replicating neo-cells to substances philic of progalins.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,828
I don't understand the obsession with GCSEs. Are they all you have? Most people forget about them the moment they're finished and no employer gives a solitary shit about them after age 18.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs replied with this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,829
@previous (L)
Actually I refuse to accept I even have those.
I've a PhD filed in a S. Amerindian country often routinely mocked by the celtic elite despite being better composed than most material here because a lot of it had to be politico-theoretically deleted for DURR SAFETY.
In its' original form, it is 76 pages. In its' current, frankly ineligable form, it is 40 - 42 pages. It may even be in grade limits to be poor Master's work in that state. But whilst it was 76 pages, the G - K algorythm shits out faithfully enough that on top of +4 from 12 grade enaniomer, I've +7, +5, +7, and like well its' essentially a post-post-doctorate on THAT measure.
I'm only proud of my English one because I didn't quite get an A * * even according to Americans but perhaps an A * * *, down-graded to a B or C equivalent because my teacher was under the pressure of non-socialists and old-autismsphere starvation/hit-sexologists, to simplify it frankly.
Autphag !MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,830
My science skills by comparison are the rote-mnemnonic joke rewarded and probably worse. Had it not been for about 100 - 500 hours of study, I would've easily received an E or F.
In Physics, its' the Snospis-sense 0; 0%, no reward-absolute. I know fuck all about the subject. Most of my chemistry discipline has been eaten up in higher levels of biochemical study directly from source of dissertate. But at the time, and this is still the case, I know fuck all about chemistry, it is perhaps likely I could solidly double-digit without passing a Chemistry paper due to over-developed algebra skills standing in for just about knowing how to <- -> flange.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,258,831
@1,258,829 (Autphag !MLHqI35Srs) > its'
You have a PhD but don't know the word is "its" (no apostrophe)? Is this like Saul Goodman's law degree from the University of American Samoa™?
> >its' > You have a PhD but don't know the word is "its" (no apostrophe)? Is this like Saul Goodman's law degree from the University of American Samoa™?
He’s obsessed with talking about his high school grades despite being nearly forty and on the dole.
> I don't understand the obsession with GCSEs. Are they all you have? Most people forget about them the moment they're finished and no employer gives a solitary shit about them after age 18.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 days later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,259,560
@1,258,831 (L)
"its'" went for post-post-compulsory in the north british curriculum if the teach liked your work politico-panaemaetrically, mate
Receptive qualities are better embodied by the over-emphasized receptive and absolute-receptive which are thought to be oblete when receptive quality obletion is used because of confusion, even if rule-excludatively but certainly conventionally, with a plural, super-imposatively-in-any-case.
@1,258,861 (Meta !Sober//iZs) @1,258,852 (B)
I'm still in my early-thirties, bud.
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 1 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^][v]#1,259,561
@1,258,831 (L)
If this refers to "any African 'bachelor' diploma in the libraries of their respective collections" type errors in genera, I've read a few such papers in my time.
For parts', probably if the over-used but very precise collective-collective offends you, unless numerous edits by my retarded step-sister have eroded that quality. Then you can call it a Pygmy paper not deserving the title, even. In which case I don't want my secondary schooling or this thing was a wise decision; not to enact even yet, I've just avoided a lot of legal visits to court-overviewers in order to get arrested by warrant so that I can (very eventually) not wind into a retard standardization-offered-lawyer. Or at least one who doesn't have such a homoerotically-retardationist interpretation of "bramble" (TANSTAFFL), in that disgusting Dravinid scots'.