Topic: I repeatedly matched with this devout Christian girl on dating apps and then THIS happened…
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #113,365
I messaged her last night asking her what advice she has for a prospective Christian. We had a brief conversation and I left her on opened.
Then about 8 hours later she messaged me again asking if there’s anything else I wanted to ask about Christianity.
Fellas, it’s working. I’m gonna have my Christian tradwife in no time.
Then about 8 hours later she messaged me again asking if there’s anything else I wanted to ask about Christianity.
Fellas, it’s working. I’m gonna have my Christian tradwife in no time.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,255,648
Actually, she just wants to spread the gospel. If she were interested in romance, she would have texted you about yourself.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,649
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 53 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,655
You might as well piss your impure thoughts of her ever sucking your dick out the window.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,657
On a scale of butch lesbian to little house on the prarie, how trad is she?
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,658
Also, are you the guy that was asking how to find a mexican gf to make home cooked meals for you? Interesting pivot, for sure.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,684
Dude, you've exchanged a few messages with one woman. This isn't a guarantee that Christianity is a free ticket to a girlfriend.
Getting so excited at such an early stage is a bad idea, tbh. You're just setting yourself up for more disappointment. At least wait until after a date or two.
Getting so excited at such an early stage is a bad idea, tbh. You're just setting yourself up for more disappointment. At least wait until after a date or two.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,685
"trad" touch grass
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,692
@1,255,684 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
^ Sounds like something someone would say that is single and forever alone. Don't take advice from adults who watch cartoons, like making or painting toy models, or have an obsessive interest in events that happened over a 1000 years ago (or obsessive interests in anything else, for that matter).
What you've seen, OP, is absolutely a guarantee that Christianity is your ticket to a trad wife. And this type of self-doubt / self-hate that the guy above demonstrated is absolutely the type of noise you should shut out of your mind. Now. Right now. It's all about mindset. You think like a failure, you will be a failure. Act and breath like the success you are. TBH, if I were you, I'd order an engagement ring now, not only to keep this positive energy going but to save the future trouble of doing so. Find some pictures of her online and photoshop the two of you together so you can make wedding invitations. You'll be happy you did. Trust me.
^ Sounds like something someone would say that is single and forever alone. Don't take advice from adults who watch cartoons, like making or painting toy models, or have an obsessive interest in events that happened over a 1000 years ago (or obsessive interests in anything else, for that matter).
What you've seen, OP, is absolutely a guarantee that Christianity is your ticket to a trad wife. And this type of self-doubt / self-hate that the guy above demonstrated is absolutely the type of noise you should shut out of your mind. Now. Right now. It's all about mindset. You think like a failure, you will be a failure. Act and breath like the success you are. TBH, if I were you, I'd order an engagement ring now, not only to keep this positive energy going but to save the future trouble of doing so. Find some pictures of her online and photoshop the two of you together so you can make wedding invitations. You'll be happy you did. Trust me.
Green !BEERiVqJJw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,702
What is a trad?
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,706
@previous (Green !BEERiVqJJw)
It's short for traditional. It's a label that's become popular in the last few years, to describe women (and I think men too) who ascribe to "traditional values", especially in regards to relationships and families. No sex before marriage, Christian, men are in charge in the relationship, women do the housework, things like that.
Personally, and this is just my opinion, I think it's a little silly. I think they're idealising the past, thinking it was some kind of golden age because women had less rights and men were more often in charge. Sure if two consenting adults want to do that kind of thing then that's fine and probably harmless, but I'm not sure it's the healthiest mindset to have in most cases. IMO a relationship should be more like a team than a boss and a subordinate.
It's short for traditional. It's a label that's become popular in the last few years, to describe women (and I think men too) who ascribe to "traditional values", especially in regards to relationships and families. No sex before marriage, Christian, men are in charge in the relationship, women do the housework, things like that.
Personally, and this is just my opinion, I think it's a little silly. I think they're idealising the past, thinking it was some kind of golden age because women had less rights and men were more often in charge. Sure if two consenting adults want to do that kind of thing then that's fine and probably harmless, but I'm not sure it's the healthiest mindset to have in most cases. IMO a relationship should be more like a team than a boss and a subordinate.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,710
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,721
@1,255,706 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
I do think what we today describe as "gender roles" do have a biological basis. If women and men want to return to the breadwinner/housewife paradigm, it seems like it would work better in some ways (child care, better food/more home cooking, etc).
I do think what we today describe as "gender roles" do have a biological basis. If women and men want to return to the breadwinner/housewife paradigm, it seems like it would work better in some ways (child care, better food/more home cooking, etc).
Green !BEERiVqJJw replied with this 2 years ago, 43 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,724
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,853
@1,255,721 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
1. why wouldn't men be able to provide those things
2. it's pretty much impossible to raise kids on a single income
1. why wouldn't men be able to provide those things
2. it's pretty much impossible to raise kids on a single income
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,868
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
> 2. it's pretty much impossible to raise kids on a single income
Maybe on your income it is.
> 2. it's pretty much impossible to raise kids on a single income
Maybe on your income it is.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,876
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,883
@1,255,853 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
> 1. why wouldn't men be able to provide those things
Men can, yes, but women do them better on average.
> 2. it's pretty much impossible to raise kids on a single income
I think this would (or at least could) change if a lot of women removed themselves from the labor force.
> 1. why wouldn't men be able to provide those things
Men can, yes, but women do them better on average.
> 2. it's pretty much impossible to raise kids on a single income
I think this would (or at least could) change if a lot of women removed themselves from the labor force.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,888
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,890
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,893
Fuckin cunt
Anonymous L double-posted this 2 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,894
cunt bitch nigger
Anonymous L triple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,895
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,897
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,898
dj coco nutty joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,899
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,900
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,903
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,906
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Shes was married to a person who was rich enough to support her
What do the rest of the women do?
Shes was married to a person who was rich enough to support her
What do the rest of the women do?
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,912
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,918
@OP
None of this happened.
None of this happened.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,255,999
@1,255,903 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Setting up society so that women are entirely dependent on the man they marry for their financial well-being is probably not better on the whole for everyone.
Setting up society so that women are entirely dependent on the man they marry for their financial well-being is probably not better on the whole for everyone.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,256,000
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,256,001
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,256,010
dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 2 years ago, 18 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,256,011
dw !p9hU6ckyqw triple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,256,013
@1,255,883 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Oh missed this one. Is there any evidence of either of those things being even slightly real
Oh missed this one. Is there any evidence of either of those things being even slightly real