Topic: MERRIN
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #113,112
Today is the day you promised you would reveal the answer to us. What will your excuse be this time?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,253,187
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,188
He seems to be running out of excuses for everything now days, with the exception of being a massive faggot that is!
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,194
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,209
The answer is 9.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,210
It's a bit embarrassing nobody has worked out the answer yet. If you think about it -- laterally -- it's rather obvious.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,211
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,214
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,217
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,253,227
@1,253,210 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> It's a bit embarrassing nobody has worked out the answer yet. If you think about it -- laterally -- it's rather obvious.
This. Way too many people have been approaching it literally when they ought to be doing it laterally.
> It's a bit embarrassing nobody has worked out the answer yet. If you think about it -- laterally -- it's rather obvious.
This. Way too many people have been approaching it literally when they ought to be doing it laterally.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc double-posted this 2 months ago, 2 years later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,578
Bump. I can now officially announce that the reveal date of the horse/fly lateral thinking problem will be this coming Christmas Eve. It'll be my Christmas gift to you all.
Stay tuned! 🎄
Stay tuned! 🎄
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 7 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,596
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 2 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,611
Oh gawd.
Thunder Balls !saAqdaazn2 joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 22 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,756
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,765
@previous (Thunder Balls !saAqdaazn2)
You have around 3 and a half weeks until the deadline. Get cracking.
You have around 3 and a half weeks until the deadline. Get cracking.
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,774
The "horse" that is gone is referring to a hors d'oeuvre (appetizer).The fly simply flew into the mouth of a person who was eating the appetizer and, when it flew back out, the person had swallowed the food. The horse (d'oeuvre) was gone.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 10 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,776
@previous (+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y)
"Must have the spelling ability of a doddering retard" is not a feature of any lateral thinking problem.
Also, since today is Sunday: bless you my child.
"Must have the spelling ability of a doddering retard" is not a feature of any lateral thinking problem.
Also, since today is Sunday: bless you my child.
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 32 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,781
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)Define:
Lateral thinking is a creative problem-solving method that involves approaching issues from new, unconventional angles. It encourages exploring alternative solutions that are not immediately obvious, fostering innovation and out-of-the-box thinking.'''
> It encourages exploring alternative solutions
> It encourages exploring alternative solutions
> It encourages exploring alternative solutions
What kind of TWO BIT FOR SHIT Education do you have?
Your position all along is that there is ONLY ONE Solution to a Lateral Thinking Problem and of course by definition that is BULLSHIT
You could have posed the problem as IT MUST MATCH 100% Exactly as posed on some obscure web site non of you are aware of
By definition there may be an Infinite number of solutions to the problem you stated.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y double-posted this 2 months ago, 4 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,782
AND with THAT It's time to saddle up a horse and head for the hills and take a view of US Marine base and hope no explosions spook the horse.
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,783
@1,404,781 (+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y)
> Define:
> Lateral thinking is a creative problem-solving method that involves approaching issues from new, unconventional angles. It does not involve babbling dotards mangling the English language in pursuit of a gibberish 'solution'.
Yep, you covered it well.
> Define:
> Lateral thinking is a creative problem-solving method that involves approaching issues from new, unconventional angles. It does not involve babbling dotards mangling the English language in pursuit of a gibberish 'solution'.
Yep, you covered it well.
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 20 hours later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,952
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 7 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,953
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,957
@1,404,783 (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)
> It does not involve babbling dotards mangling the English language in pursuit of a gibberish 'solution'.
Exactly just when where you promoted to GOD?
You a mere priest - You're proof your Church does not consider you worthy of premotion - And you are paid to spread Gibberish from you Catholic Bible.
I AM Free to Mangle the English Language and even encouraged to do so. Jesus spread his Urine and people drank it as Wine - So IF Jesus can then so can I.
> It does not involve babbling dotards mangling the English language in pursuit of a gibberish 'solution'.
Exactly just when where you promoted to GOD?
You a mere priest - You're proof your Church does not consider you worthy of premotion - And you are paid to spread Gibberish from you Catholic Bible.
I AM Free to Mangle the English Language and even encouraged to do so. Jesus spread his Urine and people drank it as Wine - So IF Jesus can then so can I.
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 15 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,958
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 3 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,961
@1,404,957 (+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y)
> Exactly just when where you promoted to BISHOP?
Hopefully in the next 2 or 3 years.
> Exactly just when where you promoted to BISHOP?
Hopefully in the next 2 or 3 years.
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,962
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,965
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 9 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,969
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)> Yes, plus one step closer to being a cardinal. And from thence to Pope.
Cough Cough Pope? As I understand it you're prior Church that allowed Marriage allowed you re merger to end up married and working for the Catholic Church.
So thanks for the laff to think we could end up with a Pope that is also Married. A Married Cardinal might also gain publicity,
Asked AI about People like you and there are a few
a set of rules crafted by Pope John Paul II in 1980 that gives married Episcopal priests who have converted to Catholicism the chance to apply for ordination in the Catholic church.
The process, which can take years, includes everything from psychological interviews to exams on Catholic theology and, in the end, a special dispensation from the pope.
The convert priests see themselves as narrow exceptions to centuries of Catholic rules, part of a drive in the Catholic church to reunite with some branches of Anglicanism. They live with special restrictions, including that they cannot become bishops. They also cannot remarry if their wives die, and must spend the rest of their priestly lives as celibates.
And a few others but NONE NOT ONE has been Promoted
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc replied with this 2 months ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,970
@previous (+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y)
The Catholic Church is rapidly changing with the times. If we are ready to accept women and homosexuals to the clergy I see no reason to believe married priests may not become Pope within the next 20 years.
The Catholic Church is rapidly changing with the times. If we are ready to accept women and homosexuals to the clergy I see no reason to believe married priests may not become Pope within the next 20 years.
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 21 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,973
@previous (Father Dave !RsSxeehGwc)OK that is a rare Fair Reply. But I am reminded - The last Pope said he was going to do something about the horrid problem the Church has re Bad VERY VERY Bad Priests. Of course he died, doing Nothing to help fix the problem.
The New Pope? He ran quickly Ran away from that South American Country where he was working on solving Two Very bad offending Priests, without even leaving instructions - So the Offenders - Nuff said - This New Pope is also just a figure head. Given a Dead Jesus is worthless except for fairy tail's -
Of course this DEAD Jesus does have value as it puts $$ in your wallet. Paid to spread Fairy Tails.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 months ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,979
also they need to stop asking boys in the confessional if they touched their weiner lately
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y replied with this 2 months ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,981
+Syntax !AT4qCO/n0Y double-posted this 2 months ago, 30 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,404,982
The answer lies in a pun: the fly didn't just fly into the horse's mouth, it flew into a specific place where the "horse" was located.The "horse" that is gone is a hobby horse or a clothes horse, both of which are stationary objects, not a living animal. The fly was inside a bar or house.
A fly flies into a man's (or a bar's) mouth, and when it flies out, the hobby horse is gone. (He swallowed the small toy horse).
A fly flies into the living room, into the mouth of a person, and when it flies out, the clothes horse (a drying rack) is gone (someone folded it up and put it away while the fly was inside the person's mouth).