Minichan

Topic: Repeatedly sending someone unwanted sexual comments

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #113,063

Is sexual harassment.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later[^] [v] #1,252,605

Repeatedly accusing someone of rape, is libel

And also sexual harassment

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 31 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,606

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The fuck are you talking about?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,611

@previous (A)
You don't agree? Let's say someone kept accusing you of sexual assault with no evidence. That would libel, correct?

Also a form of sexual harassment in my opinion

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,614

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Truth is the ultimate defense against any libel accusation. Basely accusing someone of libel is, in itself, libel. And, if coupled with an accusation of sexual intent, is also sexual harassment.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,616

@1,252,605 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Wrong, that's slander or defamation, liberal.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,617

@1,252,614 (A)
How can accusing someone of libel have a sexual intent?

Give me a scenario

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,618

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
This scenario right here, where you accused them of libel.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,619

@1,252,617 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Here: @1,252,611 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 0 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,620

@1,252,616 (C)
Isn't it libel if it's typed, trumptard?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 20 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,621

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 13 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,622

@previous (A)
Yes it is

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,623

@1,252,620 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Are you implying that you didn't use voice dictation?

Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,624

@1,252,620 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not a trumpet, merci

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,625

@1,252,614 (A)
Thats not how it works

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 37 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,626

@1,252,619 (A)
You don't understand the things you type

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,627

@1,252,623 (C)
Who does that but Squeegee?

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,630

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Inquisitive liberals.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,631

@previous (C)
Maybe your boomer ass posts here through talk to text

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,634

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Boomer

You're older than I am.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,641

@1,252,620 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You can't turn Cath against me you bitch. How about you stay in your own lane..

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,643

@1,252,634 (C)
So why do you act elderly?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,644

@1,252,641 (D)
Who are you and what in the fuck are you talking about?

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,649

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The gig is up Kook, your days of getting attention by bullying people, is OVER!

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,650

Like Meta does on PM?

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,651

@previous (E)
Hopefully.

Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,652

@1,252,643 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You're the one who projects like an old Hag.

Anonymous D triple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,655

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,661

@1,252,649 (D)
@1,252,652 (D)
@previous (D)
I don't know who you are, nor do I care

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,667

@1,252,643 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm trying to get on your level shorty.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,677

@previous (C)
By calling me a liberal and incorrectly arguing over the definition of a word? Great job, bud

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,685

@1,252,631 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You look and act like you're 60.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,694

@previous (A)
You act like a small child and look like a -3 subhuman

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,704

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I've met dogs that look and act better than you.

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,706

I've never met a dog that barks as much as kock

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,711

@previous (C)
All bark and no bite.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 56 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,715

@1,252,704 (A)
Yet you get ghosted constantly but women you don't even want to fuck

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,716

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> woof woof!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 47 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,719

@1,252,715 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You must be confusing me for someone else.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,728

@1,252,716 (C)
I love dogs and don't mind being compared to them

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,730

@1,252,719 (A)
K ☺️

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,252,743

@1,252,728 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Alright bitch
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.