Minichan

Topic: Uranium dating etc

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #112,955

Wouldn't it have to assume that the object were 100% uranium to begin with?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #1,251,523

They know how much uranium is usually on stuff and then start counting isotopes.

Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,524

If it has more isotopes it means it's older. Facts.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 48 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,526

@1,251,523 (B)
But say a rock. WE know the half-life of Uranium. How do we know now much was originally in the rock?

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,572

@previous (A)
By looking at other rocks 🪨

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,573

Why would I want to date a chemical? Women are already toxic enough.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,574

@previous (C)
> Women are already toxic enough.
And you don't date them either 😎👌

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,581

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Yes I do.

Indy (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,630

@1,251,572 (B)
How does that prove anything?

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,649

@previous (Indy)
Trust the science/experts

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,656

@previous (B)
I do. I just want to understand better.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,660

@previous (A)
I tried to help you. They look at lots of rocks.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,662

@previous (B)
That tells me nothing lol

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,664

@previous (A)
The rocks get more stable over time.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,667

@previous (B)
But wouldn't you have to know the original amount of uranium them to make that calculation?

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 46 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,672

@previous (A)
No because they can see how much Lead is in it now.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,674

@previous (B)
How does that tell them anything? would it not have had to have been 100% uranium at first for that to matter?

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,675

@previous (A)
There are other elements besides Uranium, you know. They know this from looking at rocks.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 37 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,681

@1,251,674 (A)
Looks like you discovered something all the world's top experts missed!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,690

@previous (E)
Wrong. I am only asking how it works.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,692

@previous (A)
Get that PhD, then we'll talk.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 31 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,697

@previous (E)
I have three. What about you?

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,705

@previous (A)
In what, pray-tell?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,723

@previous (E)
You would not understand.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,725

@previous (A)
So nothing. Got it.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,251,751

@1,251,723 (A)
Look at more rocks.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.