Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later[^][v]#1,250,072
If you get into an argument with a mailman, and punch him, it is a federal crime tried in federal court.
If you are elected to the head of the federal government, and try to interfere with federal elections, it apparently only a lowly crime meant to be processed by county courts and jails.
How is this not federal jurisdiction? Can any hick county prosecute top federal officials for federal matters?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,250,085
@1,250,077 (C)
Anyone who's headed the federal government should be exclusively tried in federal court.
Imagine if Biden were indicted in some backwater county in Alabama on some phony charges. You wouldn't think his position would entitle him to federal jurisdiction? Or should any little community have the power to prosecute the leader of the free world?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,250,089
@previous (B)
Presidents should be indicted anywhere they commit indictable offenses. To say otherwise is to say the President is above the law, which is bad.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,250,093
@1,250,089 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If you commit an indictable offense in a state, and there's any aspect of federal jurisdiction to it it's a federal issue.
Cross state lines, and it's federal.
Involve USPS in any way, federal.
Meddle in federal elections? Better keep that local so the residents of niggerville Georgia can deliberate on the best route forward.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,102
@previous (B)
It is possible to violate state and federal laws simultaneously. You need to take an entry level civics or law class at your local college.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,105
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yes, and the law is clear about how that's handled: federal jurisdiction applies when it's both. The locals have to hand it over.
Almost all federal court cases happened in a state, and broke local laws. Yet they still get handed off to the federal courts if they meet certain criteria.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,113
@previous (C)
Meddling in a federal election is a crime locally and federally. Hence the federal courts should take over.
Why are inconsequential cases handed over to the feds on a technicality because someone used the mail to commit a crime, but meddling in a federal election is seen as exclusively a local - not federal - crime?
Here's why: democrats want to deny trump the gravity that comes with federal cases if possible, and they believe putting it into the hands of uneducated niggers is the best way to get a conviction.
A federal jury is diverse, and will have a few members who want proof a crime has been committed.
Getting 12 niggers from the Atlanta ghetto is guaranteed to be biased in favor of the demonrats agenda.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 1 second later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,114
@1,250,105 (B)
Federal jurisdiction might or might not apply depending on the circumstances, and you can be charged both federally and locally for the same set of facts. Trump or any other defendant is free to ask for a change of venue or argue that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over these matters. You seem to want an unaccountable king and I'm sorry but you will have to move to another country to find that.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,119
@1,250,116 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Meanwhile in NYC white collar criminals get a jury of their heebs to nullify any financial crimes they get caught in.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,123
@1,250,115 (B) > Federal elections, very much ambiguous, not clearly local or federal. 🙄
They were indicted for violations of State law which means that GA can choose to prosecute them for those crimes in addition to any charges the federal government wants to bring. This is a stupid argument and you know it.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,139
@previous (B)
She's a classy lady so I will take her out to a nice Wendy's and tell her she can order anything she wants as long as it's $10 or less, and I get half her fries if she orders any. My treat.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,250,144
@1,250,085 (B)
Something can be both illegal on the state and federal level, thanks. The only "good" thing for trump is usually if someone has state charges on top of their federal ones they might serve their time "concurrently" instead of "consecutively"