Topic: Why are all famous female historical figures terrible?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #112,545
A woman pilot who failed at flying around the world.
Or a scientist known for accidentally poisoning herself with radiation.
When there's actually a Joan of Arc in there I get the sneaking suspicion that it's an homme in drag because it's so out of place.
Or a scientist known for accidentally poisoning herself with radiation.
When there's actually a Joan of Arc in there I get the sneaking suspicion that it's an homme in drag because it's so out of place.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,248,104
When a male scientist dies for his ideas/ideals he's seen as a hero or martyr
Also the drag comment is nonsensical. Thanks
Also the drag comment is nonsensical. Thanks
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,107
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> When a male scientist dies for his ideas/ideals he's seen as a hero or martyr
If a man failed to go around the world the first time, he would not be seen that way.
If he had accomplished much already, and died doing what he loved, that's different.
Earheart couldn't even make it around a preplaned flight path. It's not like there much to crash into up there.
> Also the drag comment is nonsensical. Thanks
It's "nonsensical" to think transwomen can have world changing accomplishments? Only ciswomen can do it?
> When a male scientist dies for his ideas/ideals he's seen as a hero or martyr
If a man failed to go around the world the first time, he would not be seen that way.
If he had accomplished much already, and died doing what he loved, that's different.
Earheart couldn't even make it around a preplaned flight path. It's not like there much to crash into up there.
> Also the drag comment is nonsensical. Thanks
It's "nonsensical" to think transwomen can have world changing accomplishments? Only ciswomen can do it?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,109
@previous (A)
I wasn't even talking about Earnhart as I see her as a celebrity
Yes you have no reason to believe she was a male in drag
I wasn't even talking about Earnhart as I see her as a celebrity
Yes you have no reason to believe she was a male in drag
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,111
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
She accomplished something, which 99% of the time means it's a man.
It's not unreasonable to think that the estimate for transwomen and crossdressing men could be lower than previously believed.
If some transfolk pass better than we know, that explains the outliers.
She accomplished something, which 99% of the time means it's a man.
It's not unreasonable to think that the estimate for transwomen and crossdressing men could be lower than previously believed.
If some transfolk pass better than we know, that explains the outliers.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,118
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,132
The Pythagorean Theorm actually came from the man’s wife, but nobody credits women back then. Kill yourself, OPedo.
