Topic: Feminist media has absolutely ruined modern women
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #112,542
Why would someone tell you that you're going to kill them if you go on a date?That's a you problem, hun.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later[^] [v] #1,248,012
She isnt telling you that you're going to kill her
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,013
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
She's making the assumption that I am going to kill her, which is a big "fuck you" to me.
She's making the assumption that I am going to kill her, which is a big "fuck you" to me.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,014
@previous (A)
No she isnt. She's making sure you're safe
Dont blame feminism, blame men for murdering so many women
No she isnt. She's making sure you're safe
Dont blame feminism, blame men for murdering so many women
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,015
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,016
@previous (A)
You need to see statistics to understand that men commit the vast majority of all violent crime?
You need to see statistics to understand that men commit the vast majority of all violent crime?
dj coco nut joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,025
HAHA YOU'RE SO INQUISITIVE WHY WOULD I KILL YOU HANNAH YOU'RE SO SILLY
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,066
I think it is reasonable for women to want to live through their date.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,069
"Oh the little dumb dumb can ask questions now?"
"You're so inquisitive"
"You're so inquisitive"
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,076
Like anything else in feminism, if you turn it around it immediately becomes clear to any feminist what the actual problem is.
If a woman is texting a potential date, and he says he wants to make sure she isn't a whore just out to use him for the resources he can provide, she's going to decide that this level of suspicion is an immediate dealbreaker. Her hivemind coven will validate this too, and insist she'd be miserable with anyone that thought like that.
Not that flipping it around bestows self-awareness on any feminist. It's always justified when women do it, never when men do. Almost as if it's not about consistency, just about misandry.
If a woman is texting a potential date, and he says he wants to make sure she isn't a whore just out to use him for the resources he can provide, she's going to decide that this level of suspicion is an immediate dealbreaker. Her hivemind coven will validate this too, and insist she'd be miserable with anyone that thought like that.
Not that flipping it around bestows self-awareness on any feminist. It's always justified when women do it, never when men do. Almost as if it's not about consistency, just about misandry.
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,077
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,082
The entirety of feminism is full of these double standards. Men are always accountable, women can never be. Men have responsibilities, women don't.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,085
@1,248,076 (E)
He could choose to ask those types of questions. In fact, it would behoove men to have use some discernment before fucking as many have disgustingly low standards
He could choose to ask those types of questions. In fact, it would behoove men to have use some discernment before fucking as many have disgustingly low standards
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,093
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Since men have at least some attachment to reality, and elementary reasoning skills, they are usually able to realize asking something like that has no utility in actually filtering out whores. So even wary men avoid saying something like that. They're more likely to use other ways to tell genuine interest apart from whores, if they are trying to avoid the whores.
Women, on the other hand, have emotions and associated dysfunctional compulsions. She hasn't done anything to actually tell the killers apart from the benign men, she's just being rude and sabotaging the relationship she ostensibly wanted to form.
Women can be on the lookout for dangerous behavior, and they can take steps to avoid it, but don't actually do this. It's a feminist cliche to rage out on someone that points out that going out almost naked and binge drinking at a frat house is putting yourself in harms way. Feminists are actively opposed to any education that would actually keep people safe.
They'll decide a man is a creep because of his height, income, introversion, or just the fact that he got offended by the sorts of texts OP received. Sexual assault is not predicted by the factors women use, there's obviously no data supporting that, but that's irrelevant because the point was to use the existence of sexual assault to justify the bad behavior of women in any context.
Since men have at least some attachment to reality, and elementary reasoning skills, they are usually able to realize asking something like that has no utility in actually filtering out whores. So even wary men avoid saying something like that. They're more likely to use other ways to tell genuine interest apart from whores, if they are trying to avoid the whores.
Women, on the other hand, have emotions and associated dysfunctional compulsions. She hasn't done anything to actually tell the killers apart from the benign men, she's just being rude and sabotaging the relationship she ostensibly wanted to form.
Women can be on the lookout for dangerous behavior, and they can take steps to avoid it, but don't actually do this. It's a feminist cliche to rage out on someone that points out that going out almost naked and binge drinking at a frat house is putting yourself in harms way. Feminists are actively opposed to any education that would actually keep people safe.
They'll decide a man is a creep because of his height, income, introversion, or just the fact that he got offended by the sorts of texts OP received. Sexual assault is not predicted by the factors women use, there's obviously no data supporting that, but that's irrelevant because the point was to use the existence of sexual assault to justify the bad behavior of women in any context.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,094
@previous (E)
Quote: They'll decide a man is a creep because of his height, income, introversion, or just the fact that he got offended by the sorts of texts OP received. Sexual assault is not predicted by the factors women use, there's obviously no data supporting that, but that's irrelevant because the point was to use the existence of sexual assault to justify the bad behavior of women in any context.
And yet, she didn't ask about any of that. And getting to know someone before you meet them is a perfectly reasonable safety rule
Quote: They'll decide a man is a creep because of his height, income, introversion, or just the fact that he got offended by the sorts of texts OP received. Sexual assault is not predicted by the factors women use, there's obviously no data supporting that, but that's irrelevant because the point was to use the existence of sexual assault to justify the bad behavior of women in any context.
And yet, she didn't ask about any of that. And getting to know someone before you meet them is a perfectly reasonable safety rule
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,095
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Is she actually filtering out killers? Or is she filtering out men with standards and self-respect, while predators tell her what she wants to hear until the time is right?
Is she actually filtering out killers? Or is she filtering out men with standards and self-respect, while predators tell her what she wants to hear until the time is right?
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,096
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,097
Yes, it looks like a duck. I'll even concede it walked like a duck.However, how can we be sure it quacks like a duck?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,098
I will go on a date with you.Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,099
@1,248,097 (E)
You didn't read enough of anything to come to any reasonable conclusion accept that Op has no game
You didn't read enough of anything to come to any reasonable conclusion accept that Op has no game
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,100
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You didn't read enough of anything to come to any reasonable conclusion accept that Op has no game
> accept that
> You didn't read enough of anything to come to any reasonable conclusion accept that Op has no game
> accept that
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,101
@1,248,098 (G)
Ok, but only if you accept that you're guilty of being a rapist pig until proven otherwise.
If that upsets you I'll just go to the club instead and let strangers buy me drinks until my holes are too torn and sore to continue.
Ok, but only if you accept that you're guilty of being a rapist pig until proven otherwise.
If that upsets you I'll just go to the club instead and let strangers buy me drinks until my holes are too torn and sore to continue.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,102
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 35 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,103
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,105
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 35 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,106
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,108
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
There's a difference between telling someone you want to hold off meeting in person so you can get to know them better, and trying to use the rapes and assaults of other women to manipulate a guy into acting like a simp.
There's a difference between telling someone you want to hold off meeting in person so you can get to know them better, and trying to use the rapes and assaults of other women to manipulate a guy into acting like a simp.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,110
@previous (E)
Well she tried to ask some question and she was called inquisitive in a condescending manner
Then she explained that she needed more info about him before she would meet in person
This isnt how women develop simps
Well she tried to ask some question and she was called inquisitive in a condescending manner
Then she explained that she needed more info about him before she would meet in person
This isnt how women develop simps
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,112
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Trying to instill guilt, and creating a justification for your own misconduct is how exploitative relationships start.
Women do this early on to see if they are going to get a return on their investment. Easily manipulated men don't get cut off, they just get milked for resources.
Trying to instill guilt, and creating a justification for your own misconduct is how exploitative relationships start.
Women do this early on to see if they are going to get a return on their investment. Easily manipulated men don't get cut off, they just get milked for resources.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,113
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,114
@previous (G)
I'll only feel safe if you give me kompromat that I hand off to my deadman switch.
Send me something that can ruin you, so I know you won't just kill me and rape my cold corpse.
I'll only feel safe if you give me kompromat that I hand off to my deadman switch.
Send me something that can ruin you, so I know you won't just kill me and rape my cold corpse.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,115
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,117
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,119
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,121
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,124
@1,248,119 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Calling someone inquisitive is a comment, not a neg.
If he called her ugly, that's a neg. Most people know being called thoughtful or inquisitive is praise.
Calling someone inquisitive is a comment, not a neg.
If he called her ugly, that's a neg. Most people know being called thoughtful or inquisitive is praise.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,127
@previous (E)
A neg is a backhanded compliment
Inquisitive is something you tell a small child
Also inquisitive isn't a synonym for thoughtful
A neg is a backhanded compliment
Inquisitive is something you tell a small child
Also inquisitive isn't a synonym for thoughtful
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,128
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
At worst it's highlighting the fact that she kept asking questions.
A backhanded compliment is meant to make them feel insecure, not just let someone know the questions are beginning to be a bit much.
At worst it's highlighting the fact that she kept asking questions.
A backhanded compliment is meant to make them feel insecure, not just let someone know the questions are beginning to be a bit much.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,130
@previous (E)
She kept asking questions? That's crazy
Also negging is for making people insecure. It's not just randomly insulting women
She kept asking questions? That's crazy
Also negging is for making people insecure. It's not just randomly insulting women
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,146
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Why would calling someone inquisitive make someone insecure?
Insulting someone's appearance, or intelligence would be negging. Lightheartedly saying someone's asking a lot of questions is not the same at all.
Why would calling someone inquisitive make someone insecure?
Insulting someone's appearance, or intelligence would be negging. Lightheartedly saying someone's asking a lot of questions is not the same at all.
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,150
@previous (E)
Because its not something an adult says to an adult. Please look up the definition and notice it has an alternate, negative intent
Because its not something an adult says to an adult. Please look up the definition and notice it has an alternate, negative intent
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,151
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
In the novel "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, Mr. Darcy refers to Elizabeth Bennet as "inquisitive" when they first meet at a ball. Is Mr Darcy condescending Ms. Bennet?
In the TV show "The X-Files," the character Dana Scully is frequently referred to as "inquisitive" due to her scientific research and skeptical mindset, which often causes her to question paranormal phenomena.
In an interview conducted by Oprah Winfrey, she referred to Bill Gates as "one of the world's most inquisitive minds." What do you think she meant by that, Kookie-pookie?
Maybe you've been misunderstanding what this word means precisely, because the rest of the world does not use it the way you suggest.
In the novel "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, Mr. Darcy refers to Elizabeth Bennet as "inquisitive" when they first meet at a ball. Is Mr Darcy condescending Ms. Bennet?
In the TV show "The X-Files," the character Dana Scully is frequently referred to as "inquisitive" due to her scientific research and skeptical mindset, which often causes her to question paranormal phenomena.
In an interview conducted by Oprah Winfrey, she referred to Bill Gates as "one of the world's most inquisitive minds." What do you think she meant by that, Kookie-pookie?
Maybe you've been misunderstanding what this word means precisely, because the rest of the world does not use it the way you suggest.
(Edited 59 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,152
@previous (E)
In the first two instances, they were probably being condescending
Words can have multiple meanings and intents
In the first two instances, they were probably being condescending
Words can have multiple meanings and intents
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,164
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
How about you read Pride and Prejudice, or watch the X-files and come back when you realize they were both being endearing.
How about you read Pride and Prejudice, or watch the X-files and come back when you realize they were both being endearing.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,165
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,180
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,183
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Do you want a know-it-all trying to disprove the little magic you see in the world?
Do you want a know-it-all trying to disprove the little magic you see in the world?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,184
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,185
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,186
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,187
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,189
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 26 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,192
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,200
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,214
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Just jabbing you with friendly angst. Don't EVER think I want to hurt you!!
Just jabbing you with friendly angst. Don't EVER think I want to hurt you!!
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,248,217
@1,248,012 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Wouldn't it be hilarious if the "girl" turned out be some male troll fucking with OP for the lulz?
Wouldn't it be hilarious if the "girl" turned out be some male troll fucking with OP for the lulz?