Minichan

Topic: Imagine if everyone quit their jobs and applied for food stamps.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #112,215

What a sad day that’ll be. It’s like the population would’ve said they wanted communism to win. Don’t they see the value in working? There is a sense of pride that comes from working 80 hours a week. I don’t understand the youth of today.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,245,065

You're damn right brother. These kids and lefties don't understand hard work.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,080

@previous (B)
Money. You work for money. That's all it is. People don't understand the value of their time and trade most of their daylight hours and put a lot of effort into what?

Owning all the shit they need to support the rest of their lives waking up to do the hard work they do to aquire the standard of living needed to have that job in the first place?

I agree that people must be productive. We still are and always will be "hunter gatherers," buy now we work and shop instead of running Buffalo off of cliffs. But it's still true that at the end of the day our needs as organisms are served by eating food and having shelter.

Denying people both in order to force them to do hard work and claim it's not worth paying them a higher standard of living than base "not starving to death today" kind of money is kind of fucked.

Taking pride in your output, which is what you mean by understanding hard work... also, just for money.

Like, the barter had already been made. Work = Money.

It's nice that you work your ass off doing hard work and you see that as a virtue. I guess it can be, in a sense, but in reality you're just taking pride in what you do for money.

Like a shameless ho. But see, that's fine for them. They know they're getting fucked. For money. At least they understand what the work is before getting overly excited at the word "hard."

U know?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,081

What kind of strawman is this?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,084

@1,245,080 (squeegee)
We’re not hunter and gathers. Plus nobody other than anthropologists know how actual hunter/gather societies function. This mindset is how women still get beat because they’re seen as physically weaker. Yet the female hunters in Africa and the new insights to prehistoric peoples tell us that hunting was for anyone who knew how to work a spear. You probably still associate “hunter” with “men” and “gather” with “women,” huh? You fucking marketing victim.

squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,086

@previous (A)
Yawn.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,087

@previous (squeegee)
You know I’m right.

squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 55 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,097

@previous (A)
You didn't even get the context of what I said right. Lol.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,147

@previous (squeegee)
I'm still right.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,167

You think Becky could go out and bring back a buffalo?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,258

@OP
Imagine if you lost literally everything you owned in a natural disaster and your government did literally nothing to help you. Of course, that could never happen in a wealthy Christian nation like the United States.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,264

@previous (F)
Imagine if you spent your whole life bailing out people who took stupid risks because "empathy".

squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,275

Y'all are dumb as fuck, lol

squeegee double-posted this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,277

And don't blame me for your lack of critical thinking (at best) or for your inability to acknowledge understanding (at worst) in order to APPEAR to BELIEVE that you're right as if incredulous, vague assertions -if muttered dismissively enough is just as good as the arrogance that comes from... knowing ANYTHING about what they're talking about. Ever.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,293

@1,245,264 (G)
Glad you accept that no one cares if you die, Berto. Maybe if you end up homeless again, you should just drink Evercear until your liver tells you to fuck off.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,296

@previous (A)
> everyone's bert

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,320

@previous (G)
You mad?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,327

robots

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,335

@previous (H)
You mean another group to add to "the least of these."

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,368

@previous (A)
No. Didn't you learn anything at community college?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,382

@previous (H)
Sentient Robots are going to be another mistreated group in society. Sorry you're too stupid to understand Jesus' words.

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,391

@previous (A)
Robots don't have souls, checkmate.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,394

@previous (H)
Not when they become sentient, white boy.

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,397

@previous (A)
One robot becoming sentient doesn't make them all sentient, idiot

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,400

@previous (H)
What one robot?

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,402

Blacks don't invent robots. They might sweep the floors and empty the trash of those who do. So they've got THAT going for them

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,403

@1,245,400 (A)
It doesn't matter. Do you really think that all robots will gain sentience at the exact moment that artificial general intelligence comes to be? Better throw out all your appliances, computers and phones then. After all, you believe they will one day become sentient

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,511

@1,245,264 (G)
Not difficult to imagine. Bert's Mom leaps immediately to mind.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,512

@previous (F)
Keep it up and hematomas shall rise up on your forehead..

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,517

@previous (E)
hematoma? i hardly know him!
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.