Topic: Well, Meta was a no-show
Indy started this discussion 2 years ago #112,183
As I thought. At least I got a really good cappuccino out of it.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,244,758
I think everyone, including meta, already thought this was the forgone conclusion
Indy (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,759
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,761
He didnt want to be roofied and wake up in a scat den
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 42 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,762
@1,244,759 (Indy)
That he made clear that he wanted nothing to do with you in real life? Yeah, a normie, oh nooo
That he made clear that he wanted nothing to do with you in real life? Yeah, a normie, oh nooo
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Indy (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,763
Indy (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,764
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,765
@previous (Indy)
Like I said don't try to turn this into a Bert vs trucker thing where you think meta not showing up proves anything. There was literally no indication he actually wanted to meet up with you.
Like I said don't try to turn this into a Bert vs trucker thing where you think meta not showing up proves anything. There was literally no indication he actually wanted to meet up with you.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,768
@previous (B)
It proves plenty. It proves that he can do all sorts of horrible things online, but cannot make peace in person like a real gentleman.
It proves plenty. It proves that he can do all sorts of horrible things online, but cannot make peace in person like a real gentleman.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,769
@previous (A)
Who cares? You think being able to handshake IRL after being shitlords to each other online means anything?
Who cares? You think being able to handshake IRL after being shitlords to each other online means anything?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,770
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,771
@1,244,768 (A)
Would you ever meet syntax? ChrisChan? Father Merrin? Would anyone talk shit about you for not had you not made a big deal about meta not doing the same?
Would you ever meet syntax? ChrisChan? Father Merrin? Would anyone talk shit about you for not had you not made a big deal about meta not doing the same?
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,772
@1,244,770 (A)
Again, who cares? And how does being able to shake someone's hand while being shitty online prove any of those things? It just proves civility. How many atrocious things have occured under the auspices of civility?
Again, who cares? And how does being able to shake someone's hand while being shitty online prove any of those things? It just proves civility. How many atrocious things have occured under the auspices of civility?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,773
@1,244,771 (B)
All of them except Syntax, only because I would find it hard to resist the urge to hit him.
All of them except Syntax, only because I would find it hard to resist the urge to hit him.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,775
Becky (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,778
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,779
@1,244,773 (A)
> All of them except Syntax, only because I would find it hard to resist the urge to hit him.
And yesterday you said you wouldn't hurt anyone. The lies continue to flow through you.
> All of them except Syntax, only because I would find it hard to resist the urge to hit him.
And yesterday you said you wouldn't hurt anyone. The lies continue to flow through you.
Becky (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,783
@previous (E)
Again, I would be tempted to hit Syntax, but I would not. I could never actually hurt anyone.
Again, I would be tempted to hit Syntax, but I would not. I could never actually hurt anyone.
Meta replied with this 2 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,789
Indy (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,802
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,803
Nopaltzin !tPKtSxO9ak joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,806
dj coco nut joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,807
@1,244,770 (A)
> Yes. It proves one a gentleman, a real man, and a peacemaker.
you are none of these things. you're a narcissistic sociopathic broken record of a broken man who doesn't know when to Shut the Fuck Up
I can't imagine how sick everyone in your daily life is of hearing about your bullshit hobbies or how embarrassed and disappointed they are at your shitty faux hawk and the way you squandered your inheritance on inconsequential garbage while making nothing of yourself in the process except a divorcee and deadbeat. shut the fuck up already
> Yes. It proves one a gentleman, a real man, and a peacemaker.
you are none of these things. you're a narcissistic sociopathic broken record of a broken man who doesn't know when to Shut the Fuck Up
I can't imagine how sick everyone in your daily life is of hearing about your bullshit hobbies or how embarrassed and disappointed they are at your shitty faux hawk and the way you squandered your inheritance on inconsequential garbage while making nothing of yourself in the process except a divorcee and deadbeat. shut the fuck up already
Meta replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,810
Indy (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 40 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,812
Indy (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,813
Indy (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,814
@1,244,807 (dj coco nut)
I squandered my inheritance? I am divorcé? lol wow, you know more about me than I did!
I squandered my inheritance? I am divorcé? lol wow, you know more about me than I did!
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,818
Meta replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,819
@1,244,814 (Indy)
> I squandered my inheritance? I am divorcé? lol wow, you know more about me than I did!
Drink another bottle of cheap wine.
> I squandered my inheritance? I am divorcé? lol wow, you know more about me than I did!
Drink another bottle of cheap wine.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,821
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 38 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,822
Syntax OWNS fatfuck!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,823
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,824
@1,244,821 (A)
> I am a divorcé?
So you're admitting you basically vandalised your own close relative's obituary just for internet shtick?
> I am a divorcé?
So you're admitting you basically vandalised your own close relative's obituary just for internet shtick?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,825
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,826
@previous (A)
Are you saying I have your permission to post proof that you are not married to the person in that obituary?
Are you saying I have your permission to post proof that you are not married to the person in that obituary?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,827
@previous (J)
No, even though no such proof exists. See, if I said yes, you would post some unrelated stuff about my family and use that ad excuse to do so. Why don’t you tell me first in text what your bullshit “proof” is?
No, even though no such proof exists. See, if I said yes, you would post some unrelated stuff about my family and use that ad excuse to do so. Why don’t you tell me first in text what your bullshit “proof” is?
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,828
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,829
Why are you traveling alone in Houston without your wife? Is she back at home?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 12 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,830
@1,244,828 (J)
I have sausage fingers, as I have said probably hundreds of times. And there is no proof, because I have never in my life been divorced.
I have sausage fingers, as I have said probably hundreds of times. And there is no proof, because I have never in my life been divorced.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,831
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 19 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,832
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,834
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,837
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,838
@previous (A)
> I think so. Go ahead and try to find either. I dare you.
So, to be 100% crystal clear, you are "daring" me to prove that you are not in fact married to "Yan Xiaoqing", as stated in this obituary:
https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/thetowntalk/name/mary-miller-obituary?id=11388201
That's what you are directly asking me to do, right? Thus forfeiting your right to go crying to the mods at being caught in yet another lie?
> I think so. Go ahead and try to find either. I dare you.
So, to be 100% crystal clear, you are "daring" me to prove that you are not in fact married to "Yan Xiaoqing", as stated in this obituary:
https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/thetowntalk/name/mary-miller-obituary?id=11388201
That's what you are directly asking me to do, right? Thus forfeiting your right to go crying to the mods at being caught in yet another lie?
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,840
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,841
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,842
@previous (J)
It literally is not. That is in no way "proof" that I am divorced. IT literally has nothing to do with divorce. You just want an excuse to obsessively post about my family, because you are an evil stalker.
It literally is not. That is in no way "proof" that I am divorced. IT literally has nothing to do with divorce. You just want an excuse to obsessively post about my family, because you are an evil stalker.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 59 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,844
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,845
@previous (A)
> It's really simple. Louisiana divorce records are public. Go find mine. I dare you.
If you were never married then it follows there is no divorce record. What about this basic logic is confusing you?
> It's really simple. Louisiana divorce records are public. Go find mine. I dare you.
If you were never married then it follows there is no divorce record. What about this basic logic is confusing you?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,846
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,847
@previous (A)
You're saying you married Yan Xiaoqing (despite her Facebook profile showing she was already with another man) outside of Louisiana?
You're saying you married Yan Xiaoqing (despite her Facebook profile showing she was already with another man) outside of Louisiana?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,848
@previous (J)
You mean a Facebook profile from 10 years ago? Are you stupid or just retarded obsessed?
You mean a Facebook profile from 10 years ago? Are you stupid or just retarded obsessed?
Anonymous J replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,849
@previous (A)
> You mean a Facebook profile from 10 years ago?
Exactly. Right before you wrote you were married to her in your mother's obituary. Congratulations you drunk retard, you just checkmated yourself. I'm done with you.
> You mean a Facebook profile from 10 years ago?
Exactly. Right before you wrote you were married to her in your mother's obituary. Congratulations you drunk retard, you just checkmated yourself. I'm done with you.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,851
@previous (J)
lol you are so, so stupid. A person with pics of Facebook proves nothing. Again, Louisiana records are public, you fucking idiot. I have never in my life been divorced, but I have been married.
lol you are so, so stupid. A person with pics of Facebook proves nothing. Again, Louisiana records are public, you fucking idiot. I have never in my life been divorced, but I have been married.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,852
@1,244,849 (J)
See, your only point in all of this is to post shit about my family, ONLY because you are a weird, psychotic, obsessed, stalking weirdo, and this is your life.
See, your only point in all of this is to post shit about my family, ONLY because you are a weird, psychotic, obsessed, stalking weirdo, and this is your life.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,853
@previous (A)
> a weird, psychotic, obsessed, stalking weirdo
The perfect description of MC's most revered contributor. Thanks.
> a weird, psychotic, obsessed, stalking weirdo
The perfect description of MC's most revered contributor. Thanks.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,854
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,890
@previous (A)
> No normal person would be so obsessed with someone else's family, and you know it.
We all remember your obsession with that old man in California.
> No normal person would be so obsessed with someone else's family, and you know it.
We all remember your obsession with that old man in California.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,902
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,929
@1,244,851 (A)
> lol you are so, so stupid. A person with pics of Facebook proves nothing. Again, Louisiana records are public, you fucking idiot. I have never in my life been divorced, but I have been married.
If you just admitted you were married to her and still are I think a lot of this speculation about your supposed divorce would go away.
> lol you are so, so stupid. A person with pics of Facebook proves nothing. Again, Louisiana records are public, you fucking idiot. I have never in my life been divorced, but I have been married.
If you just admitted you were married to her and still are I think a lot of this speculation about your supposed divorce would go away.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,930
@previous (H)
It is no one's business. So far, there are three contradictory theories, but it is no one's business, is it? Why do people care so much? I cannot imagine worrying so much about someone else's personal details.
It is no one's business. So far, there are three contradictory theories, but it is no one's business, is it? Why do people care so much? I cannot imagine worrying so much about someone else's personal details.
Anon X replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,933
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,934
@previous (Anon X)
Why should I? Also, why did you even care or notice? That seems obsessive. Not everyone wears wedding rings. Not all cultures, not all people, etc.
Why should I? Also, why did you even care or notice? That seems obsessive. Not everyone wears wedding rings. Not all cultures, not all people, etc.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,935
@1,244,933 (Anon X)
> Why aren't you wearing a wedding ring in any of your Youtube videos?
Why do you even give a fuck?? I mean it's like if I ask, why do you eat the peepee from a man's penis?
> Why aren't you wearing a wedding ring in any of your Youtube videos?
Why do you even give a fuck?? I mean it's like if I ask, why do you eat the peepee from a man's penis?
Anon X replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,936
@1,244,934 (A)
> why did you even care
Because the issue is your claim to be married.
> or notice?
It takes 15 seconds to pull up a video and see you're not wearing a wedding ring.
> why did you even care
Because the issue is your claim to be married.
> or notice?
It takes 15 seconds to pull up a video and see you're not wearing a wedding ring.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,937
@previous (Anon X)
I never claimed a damn thing except as a REPLY to stalkers like you who are obsessed with me. It's none of your business. Get a life, you loser.
I never claimed a damn thing except as a REPLY to stalkers like you who are obsessed with me. It's none of your business. Get a life, you loser.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,938
@1,244,936 (Anon X)
Normal people would not even THINK to examine videos for wedding rings. Normal people do not care about other people's detailed lives. Jesus.
Normal people would not even THINK to examine videos for wedding rings. Normal people do not care about other people's detailed lives. Jesus.
Anon X replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,939
@1,244,937 (A)
> I never claimed a damn thing
Caught in a lie yet again:
@1,244,851 (A)
> I have never in my life been divorced, but I have been married.
You really are a complete retard, you know that?
> I never claimed a damn thing
Caught in a lie yet again:
@1,244,851 (A)
> I have never in my life been divorced, but I have been married.
You really are a complete retard, you know that?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,940
@1,244,768 (A)
Wait, all sorts of terrible things online? I can't believe I glossed over this self victimhood post, Jesus Christ.
Wait, all sorts of terrible things online? I can't believe I glossed over this self victimhood post, Jesus Christ.
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,941
> Oh look a mud pit, let me walk in. Oh no, I got dirty, how dare all of you in the mud pit are determined to get me dirty.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,946
@1,244,939 (Anon X)
Misquoted me. I said, "I never claimed a damn thing except as a REPLY to stalkers."
Misquoted me. I said, "I never claimed a damn thing except as a REPLY to stalkers."
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,949
@previous (A)
So you haven't been married? Why did you say that even as a reply to an obsessed stalker if it wasn't to confirm or deny their uninformed claim?
Why respond to the stalkers at all.
You're that kid with a boot on his own face
So you haven't been married? Why did you say that even as a reply to an obsessed stalker if it wasn't to confirm or deny their uninformed claim?
Why respond to the stalkers at all.
You're that kid with a boot on his own face
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,953
Anon X replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,956
@1,244,946 (A)
> Misquoted me.
I quoted you word for word. If you have never been divorced but you have been married then it logically follows that you are now married.
You are living proof of the damage alcoholism does to the brain.
> Misquoted me.
I quoted you word for word. If you have never been divorced but you have been married then it logically follows that you are now married.
You are living proof of the damage alcoholism does to the brain.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,961
@1,244,953 (A)
I care, but not about you. I care about seeing one person throw down rakes, or seeing rakes obviously thrown onto the ground, purposefully stepping on them, and then complaining about being in pain, and accusing everyone of throwing rakes
I care, but not about you. I care about seeing one person throw down rakes, or seeing rakes obviously thrown onto the ground, purposefully stepping on them, and then complaining about being in pain, and accusing everyone of throwing rakes
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,979
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,982
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,983
Anonymous I double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,985
I'm ASHAMED OF YOU!!
Anonymous I triple-posted this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,987
Please kill yourself with Fire and Arby's sauce
Anonymous I quadruple-posted this 2 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,988
Booyah.
Anonymous I quintuple-posted this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,990
Big you.gswtAnonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,995
Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,039
Dude, Meta never said he was going to show up in the first place. You can't get angry at him for not showing up to something that was never arranged.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,072
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
In fact, I never agreed to anything. Thus, by doing nothing, I held up my end of the agreement! 😂👌
In fact, I never agreed to anything. Thus, by doing nothing, I held up my end of the agreement! 😂👌
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anon X replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,180
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,245,192
I wonder if Bert would've showed.