Topic: Instead of "people of color"
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #112,173
Say "people of the global majority".
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,244,650
Argumentum ad populum.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,652
@previous (B)
Not at all lol. Argumentum ad popular means "It is true because lots of people believe it." I am taking no such claim.
Not at all lol. Argumentum ad popular means "It is true because lots of people believe it." I am taking no such claim.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 42 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,654
quit being a faggot and just call them NIGGERI don't care what kind of NIGGER they are they are all stupid fucking NIGGERS and should not be allowed to live in our countries
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,666
@1,244,652 (A)
Yeah, you believe that they're better because they're the "majority." What's not clear about my statement?
Yeah, you believe that they're better because they're the "majority." What's not clear about my statement?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,668
@previous (B)
I do not believe that they are better. My point is that "people of color" implies that "white people" is the norm, the standard, the default human. Yet, people of color are the world majority. So, why not say "people" for people of color, and "white people" for anyone that is white, instead of how it is now: the opposite?
I do not believe that they are better. My point is that "people of color" implies that "white people" is the norm, the standard, the default human. Yet, people of color are the world majority. So, why not say "people" for people of color, and "white people" for anyone that is white, instead of how it is now: the opposite?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,670
@previous (A)
Hence my use of the statement. Just because they are the majority doesn't mean they are the "default human." Who built the modern world?
Hence my use of the statement. Just because they are the majority doesn't mean they are the "default human." Who built the modern world?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,673
@previous (B)
People in the US say, "A man" if he is white, and "a black man" if he is black. White is no the default human. Who built the modern world? humans!
People in the US say, "A man" if he is white, and "a black man" if he is black. White is no the default human. Who built the modern world? humans!
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,674
@previous (A)
People in the US say that because black people only make up 13% of the population, while conveniently committing over 75% of the crime.
People in the US say that because black people only make up 13% of the population, while conveniently committing over 75% of the crime.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,675
@previous (B)
Ignoring your crime crap, I am talking about THE WORLD. White people are the MINORITY. That is my point. The default, standard human is NOT WHITE.
Ignoring your crime crap, I am talking about THE WORLD. White people are the MINORITY. That is my point. The default, standard human is NOT WHITE.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,676
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,680
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,681
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,685
That's what I thought.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,686
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,688
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,689
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 15 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,244,756
@previous (E)
It's obvious that you didn't, so why would you tell me to read it when I was the sole contributor to it?
It's obvious that you didn't, so why would you tell me to read it when I was the sole contributor to it?