Topic: Oppenheimer?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,993
More like Poppin'-hymen!
Oppenheimer? I barely know her!
Oppenheimer? I barely know her!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #1,243,018
I have become death, destroyer of OP.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,031
The Nazi's biggest mistake was letting Heisenberg run and sabotage their nuclear program.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,037
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 51 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,042
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You're downplaying the role nuclear weapons had in WW2.
Some experts will say that the war was over by the time they entered, but if they weren't headhunting in the ghettos for a director they could have introduced the technology midwar. One successful nuclear test would have neighboring countries surrendering like dominoes.
You're downplaying the role nuclear weapons had in WW2.
Some experts will say that the war was over by the time they entered, but if they weren't headhunting in the ghettos for a director they could have introduced the technology midwar. One successful nuclear test would have neighboring countries surrendering like dominoes.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,045
@1,243,031 (C)
Reminds me of that one Curb Your Enthusiasm episode where a lawyer with the surname "Berg" is assumed to be Jewish, but is actually Gentile.
Reminds me of that one Curb Your Enthusiasm episode where a lawyer with the surname "Berg" is assumed to be Jewish, but is actually Gentile.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,047
Never heard of him.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,048
I’ll be watching Barbie instead.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 47 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,054
boof double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,055
They should have a Barbie movie where it's just brothers making their sisters Barbies fuck
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,057
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 55 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,063
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,067
@1,243,042 (C)
When was the earliest they could have developed the technology, acquired the plutonium/uranium, enriched it to sufficient levels, tested it in secret, weaponized it, and deployed it? Could they have done all of that without Allied spies learning about it and copying their discoveries/sabotaging them? I'm skeptical the bomb could have been developed 3+ years sooner than the Americans did, which is probably the last time it would have saved them. And I'm not sure it would have saved them. Eventually the US would have developed the bomb too, and all of Europe would have been heavily irradiated in the subsequent nuclear exchange.
When was the earliest they could have developed the technology, acquired the plutonium/uranium, enriched it to sufficient levels, tested it in secret, weaponized it, and deployed it? Could they have done all of that without Allied spies learning about it and copying their discoveries/sabotaging them? I'm skeptical the bomb could have been developed 3+ years sooner than the Americans did, which is probably the last time it would have saved them. And I'm not sure it would have saved them. Eventually the US would have developed the bomb too, and all of Europe would have been heavily irradiated in the subsequent nuclear exchange.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,074
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The nation led by a vegetarian wasn't going to be the one lobbing nukes around for nothing.
It would have led to MAD, and the war would have ended with self-determination for the Sudetenland and America ending it's imperialist ambitions early.
The nation led by a vegetarian wasn't going to be the one lobbing nukes around for nothing.
It would have led to MAD, and the war would have ended with self-determination for the Sudetenland and America ending it's imperialist ambitions early.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,078
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,082
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Pax Germanica, no vietnam war, and plentiful nuclear power.
America wouldn't go nuclear if Germany got the bomb first, it would kill them both.
Pax Germanica, no vietnam war, and plentiful nuclear power.
America wouldn't go nuclear if Germany got the bomb first, it would kill them both.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,243,086
@previous (C)
You are daydreaming which is a fine hobby, but you still have yet to answer my questions.
You are daydreaming which is a fine hobby, but you still have yet to answer my questions.