Topic: usa and china failing at climate

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,961

try driving less dirtbags

canada and uk honorably mention too

stop fucktarding IMMEDIATELY

#masstransit

(Edited 43 seconds later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #1,242,690

The world radiates most of it's energy, wasted. That energy could be life on earth.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 23 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,883

Trees need to breathe too, nerd.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,884

@previous (C)
Most self-identified treehuggers want to cut off the very gasses trees need to breath.

That sounds like a hug of death to me.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,886

@previous (B)
Surprisingly there was enough co2 for trees before humans, and us putting more into the atmosphere is not necessary for trees to exist.

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,889

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Humans don't like wildfires, but trees do! It is part of their lifecycle, and since humans have come around to put out all those refreshing, delicious fires, the trees need something to breathe. Why not emissions from human activity?

Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,890

Do you know why wildfires have been burning out of control recently? It's the trees. They're mad about climate activism starving them of co2

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,893

@1,242,889 (C)
Since trees are the primary casualty of wildfires I wouldn't say that trees love wildfires unconditionally.

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,897

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It is part of life. Some trees use wildfires to breed. Anyway, we are just now returning to co2 levels that were present when forests first emerged. Let the trees have their moment.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,930

@1,242,886 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

I've never heard a human complain about too much fresh air.

If trees had tongues, they would not complain about too much fresh air either.

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,242,936

@previous (B)
Tree used to be able to grow in vast forests in the arctic. Bet they would to go back.

Minichan