Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,242,146
@previous (F)
There’s ways to tell the difference if you’re not a complete moron. And if anything, the federal government is going to be forced to step in to regulate large tech companies. They won’t be happy, but who really gives a fuck if they are?
AI writing is just copying the style of human writing, it's really not possible to prove.
Even if there's a particular issue with the style, write out what you want it to avoid or include, and it can write it a new way instead.
If AI writing sucks when you tried, it's probably because you used bad prompts with an older model like gpt3.5.
Employed human writers are going to be outputting much more than before with new tech. Since most hollywood writing sucked before, there isn't much risk in quality.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,242,179
@previous (F)
It is quite obvious. Go right now and ask it to write a short screenplay about whatever you want, then post it here. I will show you why it is obvious.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,242,200
@previous (B)
I'm not guiding an AI through a screenplay to prove a point.
You don't just say "write me a screenplay" and get a 100 page draft, if you do, of course it will be bad. People take the first, badly prompted, response and point out flaws.
You give it context, past examples, generate a few variation and choose the best. A full-time writer can now push out 10x as much work.