Topic: It's a pity Hillary Clinton was such a monumentally shit candidate.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U started this discussion 2 years ago #111,701
Then maybe Trump wouldn't have got to appoint 3 justices to the SCOTUS bench who are now fist-fucking debt-ridden students, LGBT folk, and black college hopefuls.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,240,809
The good news is with luck this will only continue for another 30 or 40 years, so blowing the 2016 election wasn't such a big deal.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 41 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,810
🤔Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,815
Phatthew Phosteet Philler joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,816
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,826
Hillary can still be our president!
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,834
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,858
So when do we start killing Republicans and Democrats?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,860
She was smug and arrogant, blamed all her failures on sexism, and had no plan to improve material conditions.
Trump was not a good candidate, but he offered people a chance to thumb their noses at the establishment.
If the left wasn't obsessed with hateful idpol, we'd have a much better government.
Trump was not a good candidate, but he offered people a chance to thumb their noses at the establishment.
If the left wasn't obsessed with hateful idpol, we'd have a much better government.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,861
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 54 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,865
@1,240,860 (H)
He was a good candidate the first time around. He beat a gigantic field of GOP establishment guys with way more money and then beat the candidate in the general with triple the funds.
His candidacy was historically good. You seem stupid.
He was a good candidate the first time around. He beat a gigantic field of GOP establishment guys with way more money and then beat the candidate in the general with triple the funds.
His candidacy was historically good. You seem stupid.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,868
@previous (I)
Trump narrowly beat Clinton while losong the popular vote with a modest GOP bias in the EC. Which means that he was roughly as good a candidate as her. Maybe a little worse or better depending on how you want to slice it. Do you think Clinton was a historically good candidate as well?
Trump narrowly beat Clinton while losong the popular vote with a modest GOP bias in the EC. Which means that he was roughly as good a candidate as her. Maybe a little worse or better depending on how you want to slice it. Do you think Clinton was a historically good candidate as well?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,877
Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,882
@1,240,865 (I)
That's not being a good candidate, that's people choosing an entertaining troll over the status quo.
Trump supporters, at least at first, weren't picking him for his ability to speak and make policy.
That's not being a good candidate, that's people choosing an entertaining troll over the status quo.
Trump supporters, at least at first, weren't picking him for his ability to speak and make policy.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,240,884
@1,240,868 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
He was historically good given how little money his campaign spent and the amount of funding his opponents spent.
Clinton should have outperformed Obama but she didn’t she actually lost voters in many key demographics.
He was historically good given how little money his campaign spent and the amount of funding his opponents spent.
Clinton should have outperformed Obama but she didn’t she actually lost voters in many key demographics.