Topic: It makes me legitimately angry to see attractive women
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago#111,697
Imagine living life on pure easy mode. Everything handed to you because you're pretty, never going without sex or love for more than a couple days at a time, a buffet of men to choose from for most of your life.
It's been 4 months since I last had (really underwhelming) sex. I don't think there's a biological woman on earth that knows this feeling.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,753
@previous (A)
I'm substantially uglier and more socially awkward than you and I dont complain. Stop being whiny. No woman wants to fuck a guy who blames women for his own failings. Put a smile on your face, go on some dates, see what happens.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,754
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I've done that. I can't get a date. Women don't match with me on dating apps. I've only got 15 matches in the past month or so on FB Dating, and none of them went anywhere because I'm not attractive enough.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,757
@1,240,754 (A)
Are you sure it’s that you’re not attractive enough or is it because deep down inside you’re an ugly human being who only wants to date inexperienced, immature, and toxic women because your parents were toxic?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,760
@1,240,756 (E)
I'd rather have creeps hitting on me and making me feel validated than never having ANYONE show ANY interest in me other than fat bitches and single moms.
@1,240,755 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Hitting the gym isn't going to fix my face and height, you fucking imbecile. Women only like guys that are 6+ feet tall and I can't change my height being 5'10".
@1,240,757 (E)
Sorry I wanna date younger women? Lmao, I don't like old used up hags.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,761
@1,240,753 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Dumb to say that incels are incels because they don't take responsibility.
Even in a perfectly monogamous society, there's more men born than women.
From the start, some men are going to be alone no matter how confident they are, or how much the self-improve.
Throw in multiple women sharing top men, and a large portion of men are going to be in that camp no matter what they do.
The idea that there's someone for everyone, as long as they are positive, is divorced from basic reality and supply+demand.
How do you explain the fact that men have to compete for women? Lib ideology ends up implying men are inherently bad and women are inherently good. Men just choose loneliness because they just refuse to do the bare minimum. It defies basic human nature, but libs never question that. And why do women not fall into this same trap? Libs have no answer to that, women are just good and choose to be happy. What a coincidence this happens across the world, and men just keep choosing pain over stable living relationships.
> Sorry I wanna date younger women? Lmao, I don't like old used up hags.
Your instincts are guiding you to what would produce the healthiest offspring, just like every other creature (regardless of gender) and so that means you're a terrible, vile person.
You must have chosen this preference for no reason, by coincidence so does half the population.
To redeem yourself find a woman who would sneer at you while she was cute, and is only now interested since she can't get people to finance her party lifestyle anymore. Devote yourself to her, and understand any problems in the relationship are the result of your toxic masculinity, thanks.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,765
@previous (A)
Mark knows that being a kind and compassionate person means not questioning why one sex has such a different lived experience, and rebuffing anyone who believes "math" that says a skewed population ratio prevents everyone from having monogamous relationship
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,766
@1,240,760 (A)
5'10 is fine lmao. I have an ugly face too. Luckily women don't care as much about an ugly face as men do. Trust me, I've dated women out of my league. You just need to make them feel safe and comfortable. Women will pick up on any weird or threatening vibes you give off and based on your posts ITT you do not seem like the kind of man a woman wants to settle down with. do some cardio, bench presses and squats 2-3x a week for a couple months and you'll be good to go.
@1,240,761 (C)
This is not really true if you have spent even a tiny amount of time in the actual world. Look at any city and the ratio of guys to girls is usually skewed in men's favor. There is always churn in the dating market - different people will start or stop being single at different times so there's never a fixed pool of unavailable people. Hypothetically if there was a place with for example 50 men and 49 women, that there would be one man who never dated anyone. At any given time there would be one more single man than single woman, but since not every relationship results in a lifelong marriage, it's actually totally fine. One of the other couples would break up and there would be a new guy out every so often.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,770
@1,240,768 (A)
Ok so you have a sense of humor, and a woman liked you enough to have a friendly conversation. Seems like you're doing fine? It's just a numbers game - if you go on enough dates, eventually you'll find someone who's a good fit. The anger towards attractive women seems a bit pointless.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,771
@1,240,766 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What you said would look true to anyone who believed in romantic notions that from 18 until death everyone was in the dating scene.
Humans are the same as any other creature, romance is primarily driven by fertility, and provisioning resources.
The number of men who can provide cash and functional sperm is high. The number of fresh fecund females, I fear, falls far lower.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,774
@1,240,770 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
She didn't respond to my last message though. Therein lies the problem. I can get a brief conversation, but when it comes to actually hanging out with them I never get anywhere. I was dating this cute mixed girl a few months back and I got way too attached to her and scared her off and we haven't spoken in months now. I haven't even kissed a girl since then because I can't find anyone willing to meet up with me in person. I'd rather not take a girl on a date that I just want to smash; most of the time I don't even want to smash them, because I love to eat pussy, and I don't want to eat the pussy of some bitch that has been railed by 100 other dudes on dating apps. That's even a low estimate. Most of them are getting close to the 1000s at this point.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 13 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,778
@1,240,771 (C)
People date and marry in their 40s 50s and 60s. You have a very mechanical view of human relationships that is not based on reality, but is instead based on some rules you came up with in your head that you think must apply. Not every guy wants kids. Not every woman wants to date an older man. I don't know where you're getting these dumb ideas from but you really need to start dating before you decide you know how dating works.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,781
I'm caught up with the thread and I'm no more reassured a sorority house isn't getting shot up this weekend.
OP, most women are attracted to confident, powerful personalities. Look at Pete Davidson. That ugly bug-eyed fuck has banged everyone from Ariana Grande to Kim Kardashian to Emily Ratajkowski. Stop fixating on how you look. Women aren't doing it so why should you?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,782
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Why should I be confident if I don't have the looks for it? My parents didn't instill confidence in me and my life is in shambles.
> Yes. I need love. I need intimacy. I need to feel a woman's touch.
Then why are you narrowing yourself to only beautiful women and excluding, as you called them,"fat ugly bitches"? You think 'unattractive' women can't give love and intimacy?
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 20 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,788
@1,240,784 (A)
Expressing the fact that you are devoid of something on the very bottom of the Maslow pyramid means that you are contributing to rape culture.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,789
@1,240,786 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I don't want intimacy from some ugly fat girl. I want it to be from someone I find attractive, and believe it or not, my standards are not very high. I can deal with a slightly chubby, plain looking girl, because I'm a slightly chubby, plain looking guy. But even the slightly chubby plain looking girls are Chad-only because dating apps have skewed their perception of their own attractiveness and they think they can lock Chad down to a commitment.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,790
@1,240,786 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
It means nothing. Those women are available because the very core part of romance: the ability to produce offspring - is gone.
Her price goes down, and she settles because she's forced to. That's hardly a special bond.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,791
@previous (C)
OP isn't saying he wants to reproduce. He says he wants intimacy and love. Those things aren't connected to looks. Melania Trump is a high-value attractive woman and Donald Trump was a high-value handsome man when she married him yet their marriage probably has all the intimacy and affection of a mass grave.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 19 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,792
@1,240,787 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I am currently living at home with my parents because I had a nervous breakdown in 2022 when my ex cut ties with me completely and moved in with a new guy. I quit my job and enrolled back in school. I'm currently working from home for a call center, and my social circle is pretty small these days because I'm pushing 30 and live in a smallish city where everyone kinda knows each other or knows OF each other, and my ex ruined my reputation and painted me out to be a physical abuser when I was only an emotional abuser, not by choice, but because I am bipolar and was unmedicated. I'm medicated now.
> I don't want intimacy from some ugly fat girl. I want it to be from someone I find attractive
Then you're as shallow as the women and 'Chads' you're raging against. Not a judgement, just an observation. You're a part of the problem you claim to want to solve.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,794
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Ugly fat girls can easily get laid, all they have to do is download Tinder and sit for a few minutes. Have you not seen the Grannyfishing videos?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,795
@previous (A)
Again with your "getting laid" obsession. You want love and intimacy or just a hook-up? If a hook-up then yeah, you need to be attractive to get an attractive woman. If you want a loving relationship with a kind and intelligent woman you need to be reasonably intelligent, funny, confident and successful. None of which are connected with looks.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,797
@1,240,793 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Everyone is subject to their shallow urges, and those urges are not coincidental, but the product of evolution favoring traits that compell one to breed.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,803
@1,240,780 (C)
Reducing all of human existence down to base biological evolutionary urges and basing your worldview around that will not help you lead a happy and meaningful life. It might be more profitable for you to instead focus on the aspects of your life that are within your control, and to create a life for yourself that a woman would want to share in. It's probably worth giving the ol' college try, just to say you made an effort.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,820
@1,240,817 (C) > Saying "just try" sidesteps the point that it will be mathematically impossible for most men to find a partner that meets their built in preferences.
I'm sorry this is flatly not true. By age 40 80% of men and 86% of women have been married at least once. There are some men who will never be married because they are complete losers but even those men will have girlfriends at some point. The number of people who hit 40 and have never been in a serious relationship is miniscule. You can convince yourself that you have figured out how to apply the cold, hard, unflinching logic of numbers to relationships but you are simply empirically incorrect. Please stop being such a grouch and start dating rather than blackpilling yourself into a self-imposed relationship doom because there are marginally more women than men in the world or whatever.
Again, you're treating a man who marries a fecund fit female and a man who marries an eggless hag as the same thing. They both got married so the both won, right?
Dating an older woman is no different than settling for for a man, or simply staying single.
If I get laid every week, it doesn't change the facts, it just means I'm in that lucky group of haves. And why should that mean I then gaslight men into thinking the field is balanced in the cishet game.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,240,824
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
No different than telling 7 people playing musical chairs with 5 chairs that everyone could find a chair if only they tried.