Minichan

Topic: Trans activist gets norks out on White House lawn.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,361

Thoughts, fora?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trans-activist-rose-montoya-doubles-going-topless-white-house-says-perfectly-legal

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later[^] [v] #1,237,499

Would bang.

Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,500

Would have been funnier if she pulled her penis out.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,501

@previous (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Missing the point.

Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,505

@previous (squeegee)
What was the point?

squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,510

@previous (Erik !AltRitexT6)
People are more than happy to call you sir until you go jogging around the block topless and then they call you a whatever it takes to get the police to come check your ID.
There's no consistency. Is it a problem I identify as female or that I appear to be female or is the problem with people's concern with and lack of consideration for others?
If I get mad at people for their views I'm called a crazy tranny and have to respect their right to have disagreeable beliefs. If other people get mad at me because of their views, people say "well, that's understandable I can see their point, and people are entitled to their beliefs."
So, you get you tits out at the Whitehouse and fox News covers you. I wonder how many shirtless gay men there were that didn't raise any eyebrows.

Is it just the clothes that are a problem? Or are my beliefs the problem?

I know the answer, but I'm attacked over that too.

And watch, no matter what I say or how I say it someone will very likely have something to say about me for having said anything at all.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,511

Biden is then seen holding the camera in an attempt to take a selfie with Montoya and other attendees, but the camera was set to video mode.


😂

Erik !AltRitexT6 replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,515

@1,237,510 (squeegee)
I don't know about any of that. I just think it would have been more funny if zir whipped her cock out and yelled "sucked this J K Rowling "

squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,542

@previous (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Well, now you do. I'm glad you asked and I communicated that to you.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,552

She's been Vishna'd!

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,569

Surely there is nothing obscene about a biological male going around topless. What is the big deal?

Oh that's what she says in the article. Grate minds think alike.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,572

I mean it's weird and inappropriate but who really gives a shit? People get incensed at the most retarded crap. Fox News will talk about it for a month I'm sure.

(Edited 44 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,573

Oh yeah it's dumb and inappropriate and obviously you don't get your tits out at the WH unless you're desperate for attention and very self-centered and she's not getting invited to anotjer event there. The WH has a very firm "Show your rack, don't come back" policy.

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,580

@1,237,569 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

> Surely there is nothing obscene about a biological male going around topless. What is the big deal?
>
> Oh that's what she says in the article. Grate minds think alike.

lol

Anonymous I double-posted this 2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,581

I have to admit she looks fuckable. Only problem was the minute she opened her mouth and spoke she had a typical gay guy voice and didn’t sound feminine at all.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,771

@1,237,542 (squeegee)
oh you're the preachy type.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,842

if her goal was to make trans ppl seem dumb and annoying she succeeded
we should be focused on stopping greenhouse gases baking the earth alive anyway.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,237,848

@previous (K)
#freethenipple
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.