Yea, what a douche. He has a reputation for being a sleaze. Other women, who will gain nothing, have accused him of sexual assault. I believe the maid. Lying about one thing doesn't necessarily mean you lie about everything. If it was a setup, I think they would have found someone better looking.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#199,616
Didn't she make false rape allegations in the past? That's suspicious.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#199,618
Good for him.
sluggy (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#199,668
@199,616 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Not in the same way. she exaggerated being raped while seeking asylum. She claimed ot have been gang raped.It was for her asylum claim, not allegations against a person.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#199,676
@previous (sluggy)
If I were to make up a claim that I was robbed by a group of men,and it turned out to be false, you probably wouldn't believe me if I later accused a specific person of robbing me.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#199,712
He's innocent until proven guilty, he has every right to sue her.
Freecode !!4IKKtS9GG joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#199,756
A sleaze...
Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#199,757
If he's actually innocent, then there's nothing wrong with it.
> He has a reputation for being a sleaze
There's a pretty big difference between being a bit of a pervert and being a rapist.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#199,789
@previous (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
Yeah, but there have been assault allegations about him before (edit: may just be one?). It's not just that he's a perv.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Freecode !!4IKKtS9GG replied with this 15 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#200,404
@previous (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
Should the accusations against the Duke Lacrosse three be considered in any future legal proceedings? The maid was recorded saying that she wanted money out of it and there was no evidence against Strauss-Kahn. Having consensual sex with a woman should not make a man vulnerable to legal or political recourse, and this scandal should serve the observant as a power check against the justice industry.
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#200,745
@previous (Freecode !!4IKKtS9GG)
I think it's fair that a judge should decide that question based on the strength of the previous allegations. For criminal cases, I tend to think no, but civil cases often do allow this.
Keep in mind that swamplights was implying the alleged victim's past made her seem more guilty, and this was just to point out his past does rather the same thing as well. If you can't consider his past, should it be any different for her?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#200,813
@previous (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
Women are given enough passes in our society. Just once how about we let someone without tits and a vagina have the benefit of the doubt?
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#200,814