Minichan

Topic: The anti-trans movement is literally the harbringers of eugenics.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,304

The return of eugenics anyway. Which means pretty sure trans rights would be irrelevant as it’ll be a fight for existence for anyone outside of the established eugenic outlook of what a human being looks like. Which means a lot of people on Minichan would likely be considered inferior and impure.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 40 minutes later[^] [v] #1,236,812

harbinger*

Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 18 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,813

(Catherinedraad)

Green !!bO/s3MBcD joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,818

@1,236,812 (B)
I used to make that mistake a lot.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,821

Given that the ultimate goal of trans sexuality is to get your reproductive system destroyed in an attempt to form a vague facsimile of the opposite sex's genitalia... I mean they're already getting sterilized.

The "eugenic" option would be to make it much easier to get your nuts cut off or your ovaries removed.

Meta !Sober//iZs double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,822

Of course it's also possible transsexualism is not genetic and therefore eugenics wouldn't do anything either way towards it.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,825

@1,236,821 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Trans people can still have children.

(Edited 29 minutes later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 50 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,827

I dont see the connection

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,828

@1,236,825 (A)
Yes thats why being anti trans isnt eugenics

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,829

May I ask what you think eugenics are?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,830

Eugenics are widely accepted in modern society. If you don't believe me, go to try to marry your brother

Anonymous F double-posted this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,831

@1,236,825 (A)

> Trans people can still have children.

Not if they're doing it right

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,846

@1,236,828 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No, fake Kook. You’re just on the bottom end of the impurity.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,847

@1,236,831 (F)
1) Artificial insemination
2) Pregnancy (trans men)

Learn some more, you fucking impure cunt.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,848

@1,236,846 (A)
What are you fucking talking about

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,849

@1,236,847 (A)
Its weird when trans women want to get someone pregnant, or when trans men want to be pregnant

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 2 years ago, 39 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,850

Also I still feel like you dont understand eugenics

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,854

@1,236,847 (A)
So you're being trans wrong, got it

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,855

Eugenics is the concept of encouraging certain people to breed or not breed to strengthen a population. Do you understand this?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,856

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
"Encouraging".

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,858

@previous (G)
Im just trying to explain the concept to Op

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,862

@1,236,856 (G)
Go on, say it.

squeegee joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,953

they can just be busy-body asses who would make decisions for other people just because they wouldn't make the same decision for themselves. they don't have to be proponents of selective breeding and forced sterilization just because they can't make decisions for themselves and they just HAVE to go around deciding things for everyone else too. i can see the relationship between the eugenics movement and self-righteous know-it-alls who can't admit when they're wrong to try and force something permanent onto other people when it has zero impact on their own lives.

but if it was eugenics then they would probably be fine with trans, it's not exactly the most successful strategy when it comes to breeding, and if it's seen a negative trait -eugenicists would probably consider it like... a freeby? and would encourage it. but no, the anti-trans movement are just a bunch of assholes with nothing better to fuck than other people's lives.

Not. exactly. the Ubermensch. you feel?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.