Topic: in Australia, you could go to prison if your kids all died

boof started this discussion 2 years ago #111,268

This lady got let out when they found out that her kids had DNA that make their hearts bad but they put her in prison for smothering them 30 years ago despite no physical evidence for smothering, but it's like, well she must have smothered them so in the clink she goes

Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later[^] [v] #1,236,354

Imo parents who have autistic children should also go to jail.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,373

Shithole country with shit laws. What do you expect?

Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 17 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,374

@1,236,354 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
You'd really wish that on your parents?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,392

I think she killed them

Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 35 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,393

A lot of exonerations are just people getting off on technicalities

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,394

A dingo ate them.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,399

I knew someone who was persecuted by cps and they found out their child had brittle bone disorder

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,402

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Did they discover the bone disorder because they beat their child?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,406

@previous (G)
If they had beat their child, it probably would have died

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,409

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> it
Is that the child's preferred pronoun?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,412

@previous (C)
I dont know its pronouns

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 33 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,424

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
So you just assumed and likely misgendered the child. Got it.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,425

@previous (C)
She no gendered it. It isn’t a pronoun idiot

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,426

@previous (D)
It most definitely is a pronoun and is used by many every day.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,428

@1,236,424 (C)
Boo hoo

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,430

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Real mature.

Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,444

@1,236,425 (D)

> It isn’t a pronoun idiot

??

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,446

@1,236,425 (D)
"It" is a pronoun, you mora.

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,448

@1,236,444 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
It's puzzling how someone married to a trans woman could be so unconcerned about gender identity and so casual about misgendering a child. It's almost like a person like that doesn't truly care about these issues and had other motivations in such a marriage.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,474

@1,236,424 (C)
@previous (C)
Actually I called it a thing because I barely see children as human until they reach a certain age. Thanks

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,491

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I barely see you as a human.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,495

@previous (C)
Oh my gawd, you're so obsessed with me

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,498

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You're the only one obsessed with yourself.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,507

@previous (C)
Yet you follow me around like a baby duckling, desperately quacking for attention

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,509

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Don't involve me in your fantasies.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,517

@previous (C)
But you clearly love it, dirty boy

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,536

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No, I don't. Please stop sexually harassing me.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,546

@previous (C)
Stop begging me for attention

Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,547

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Stop replying to threads I responded to first.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,236,548

@previous (C)
No

Minichan