Minichan

Topic: Question: if a biological male knowingly dates a transwoman

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,041

...are they both, in fact, closeted homosexuals refusing to acknowledge their own disgusting faggotry?

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later[^] [v] #1,234,237

If you have a penis and you have sex with someone else who has a penis then you are a homo. This isn't rocket science.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,245

You should try it and let us know.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 57 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,250

No

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,274

@1,234,245 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Why would he when you have a lifetime of experience to answer with?

spectacles joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,308

boy, some number of y'all are really wrestling with some kind of internal struggle. as someone who is acutely aware of the kinds of signs and symptoms of exactly the manifestations these kinds of struggles have on individual behaviors i can tell you this: obviously fake anon is not the one with suspect experiences, answers or a lifetime of "why" questions anyone is even remotely wondering about.

and dw is also very confidently unambiguously not interesting in terms of this specific conversation about internal preoccupation with how people's bits fit with other bits and what that means for their concepts of allowable forms of discrimination of others, self determination, ridicule, loathing and even love, attraction, isolation and veiled cries for help.

just know, it's okay, y'all. it IS going to be okay.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,311

@previous (spectacles)
> obviously fake anon is not the one with suspect experiences, answers or a lifetime of "why" questions anyone is even remotely wondering about.
Yes, he is.

spectacles replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,314

@previous (E)
let's talk about you, what's up, E? you doing alright?

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,317

@previous (spectacles)
Yes. And you?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,326

I don’t know. I’m not an expect on human sexuality.
But the one thing I do know is…

@OP is a faggot.

spectacles replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,336

@1,234,317 (E)
i can't complain

WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,349

who cares?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,588

The qualifier "biological" is redundant. In this scenario it's just a bloke dating another bloke, in which case they would be homosexual (if doing so satisfies their sexual desires).

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,653

@previous (I)
> in which case they would be homosexual

But are they closeted homosexuals?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.