Minichan

Topic: Brie and Kook documents

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,015

Tempted to dump

(Edited 39 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #1,233,816

Post the divorce papers please

tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,817

Nope. Not here. Reminder of our rules. Get a hobby you sad cunt.

(Edited 19 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,819

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
I appreciate you

I do though give permission for these infamous divorce papers to be posted

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,822

@1,233,817 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Let's not infantilize kook. She can make her own decisions even if they're unwise. This is the People's Fora™ and the Freedom Fora™.

boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,829

long form birth certificate

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,830

@1,233,822 (D)
there hasn't been a divorce so there's nothing you have permission to post

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 45 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,831

@previous (F)
Thanks for revealing the plan to try to get people banned that you don't like:

-Ask for documents to be posted.
-Cry to the mods when they are posted and claim that they're fake.

It was transparent already that you'd do something like that, but it's nice to see it confirmed explicitly.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,833

There was no divorce.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,834

@1,233,831 (D)
I'm giving permission to post the divorce papers and nothing else. Pretty easy to understand

Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,837

@1,233,831 (D)
the document in question doesn't exist, so if something shows up it's fake, and not an actual record of divorce. sounds like your plan is to get banned though

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,864

@1,233,834 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Exactly like I said. This is what they call a "bait and switch". Although you're doing it in such an obvious way, no one will fall for it. Try to be more subtle next time.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 33 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,892

@1,233,817 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Next time kook asks for proof, post a link to this comment.

I would have posted the divorce papers a week ago, but I actually read and understand the rules.

Kook is relying on people not knowing the bylaws, so she can report them and have them banned.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,901

@previous (H)
Post the divorce papers right now

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,909

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't want to make a new UID, but nice try.

The admins have also never clarified whether we need permission from both parties. Even if you're ok with it, what if Brie is upset and complains? I would have doxed her essentially too, without permission.

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,911

@previous (H)
I see. I guess it will continue to be a mystery

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,915

@1,233,892 (H)
It really ought to be against the rules to encourage others to violate the rules. @1,233,817 (tteh !MemesToDNA)

It's a very juvenile tactic that she's using to try to win a demonstrably untrue argument.

Anonymous H replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,233,916

@previous (D)
This is how the law usually works.

Theft isn't just illegal, but encouraging someone to steal is also illegal. True for all felonies!

Out of respect for Brie, and the rules of this board, I will not be posting personally identifiable information.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,234,059

Fake Kook.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.