Topic: the Bank of England is ABOVE the monarch

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #110,609

and parliament/govt. PROOF:

BoE was chartered in 1694. Not even the monarch can withdraw that royal charter without the BoE's consent. FACT.

BUT, look at the timing. 1694. Who was monarch?

Mary II, married to (((Dutch))) cunt William of Orange.

Mary died in....1694.

When did she come to the throne?

1689. 🤔

Why then? Because her father, James II, was deposed during "the glorious revolution".

It was a BANKING COUP initiated in (((the Netherlands))). Pure and simple.

Worse, the BoE is 100% outside of the control of govt or the monarch.

And they intend to LITERALLY enslave humanity with CBDC that THEY control.

(((CUNTS))).

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 8 hours later[^] [v] #1,230,616

Big if true.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,648

Literally not one person would care if the UK sunk beneath the waves. It does not matter at all who is really in charge of that fairy tale made up place.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,650

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I thought you were busy with work.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,651

@1,230,648 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
india relies on British manufacturing and legal philosophy to maintain its civilization. So, a billion people would care quite a bit.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 57 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,653

@1,230,650 (D)
I am doing intellectual work.
@previous (E)
They'll just get it from America, the superior English-speaking country.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 4 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,654

@1,230,650 (D)
Most Palestinian children are in bed by 9:30PM, there isn't much work for mark to do around that time.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,655

@1,230,651 (E)
No it doesn't. No they would not.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,656

@previous (D)
Who do you think built their railways?

Hint: it wasn't russia or china or france.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,657

@1,230,654 (E)
Who's in charge of attacking them in their sleep then?

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,659

@previous (D)
Budget cuts means that often times no one is.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,798

@previous (E)
shamefur

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,801

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-65308769

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,230,817

@previous (G)

> But the retail industry body said there was a three to nine-month lag to see price falls reflected in shops.
It's interesting that they always rise instantaneously but have a nine-month lag to fall, provided they ever do.

Minichan