Topic: word salads
(½,0)⨁(0,½) started this discussion 2 years ago #110,394
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,229,124
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,125
words are just another form of art
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,127
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,171
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,172
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,179
getting a little abstract there(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) quadruple-posted this 2 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,181
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) quintuple-posted this 2 years ago, 48 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,182
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)brie
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) sextuple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,183
kook(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) septuple-posted this 2 years ago, 40 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,185
99.9% brie(Edited 1 minute later.)
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) octuple-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,186
99.9% kook(Edited 45 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 58 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,196
Phatthew Phosteet Philler joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,221
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,226
@previous (Phatthew Phosteet Philler)
oh, no, i wouldn't say that. i'd say there are quite a lot of motherfuckers that are jealous as fuck of brie. there's 2 kinds of people that are jealous as fuck kinds of people. there is nothing wrong with looking up to people. i don't think people necessarily get what they deserve, or always deserve what they get. these are assertions of justice, not vindications. but they certainly can be used either way, before or after the fact, but in all cases they're a recrimination made by one kind of jealous person. and they want to make people feel ashamed. period.
i think people deserve to be known for what they're capable of. and i'm not going to be the one who decides what anyone else is capable of. everyone makes their own choices. everyone decides for themselves exactly who they need to be, and i can't say that anyone's needs are invalid just because i wouldn't want to make the same choices. nobody is beneath me. people always will always know the difference between looking up, and looking down on others as exactly what they're capable of. and which is a want, and which is a need.
and then there's the second type. and they're just never around when anything matters.
oh, no, i wouldn't say that. i'd say there are quite a lot of motherfuckers that are jealous as fuck of brie. there's 2 kinds of people that are jealous as fuck kinds of people. there is nothing wrong with looking up to people. i don't think people necessarily get what they deserve, or always deserve what they get. these are assertions of justice, not vindications. but they certainly can be used either way, before or after the fact, but in all cases they're a recrimination made by one kind of jealous person. and they want to make people feel ashamed. period.
i think people deserve to be known for what they're capable of. and i'm not going to be the one who decides what anyone else is capable of. everyone makes their own choices. everyone decides for themselves exactly who they need to be, and i can't say that anyone's needs are invalid just because i wouldn't want to make the same choices. nobody is beneath me. people always will always know the difference between looking up, and looking down on others as exactly what they're capable of. and which is a want, and which is a need.
and then there's the second type. and they're just never around when anything matters.
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,227
Phatthew Phosteet Philler replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,229
@1,229,226 ((½,0)⨁(0,½))
> oh, no, i wouldn't say that. i'd say there are quite a lot of motherfuckers that are jealous as fuck of brie. there's 2 kinds of people that are jealous as fuck kinds of people. there is nothing wrong with looking up to people. i don't think people necessarily get what they deserve, or always deserve what they get. these are assertions of justice, not vindications. but they certainly can be used either way, before or after the fact, but in all cases they're a recrimination made by one kind of jealous person. and they want to make people feel ashamed. period.
>
> i think people deserve to be known for what they're capable of. and i'm not going to be the one who decides what anyone else is capable of. everyone makes their own choices. everyone decides for themselves exactly who they need to be, and i can't say that anyone's needs are invalid just because i wouldn't want to make the same choices. nobody is beneath me. people always will always know the difference between looking up, and looking down on others as exactly what they're capable of. and which is a want, and which is a need.
>
> and then there's the second type. and they're just never around when anything matters.
tl;dr
> oh, no, i wouldn't say that. i'd say there are quite a lot of motherfuckers that are jealous as fuck of brie. there's 2 kinds of people that are jealous as fuck kinds of people. there is nothing wrong with looking up to people. i don't think people necessarily get what they deserve, or always deserve what they get. these are assertions of justice, not vindications. but they certainly can be used either way, before or after the fact, but in all cases they're a recrimination made by one kind of jealous person. and they want to make people feel ashamed. period.
>
> i think people deserve to be known for what they're capable of. and i'm not going to be the one who decides what anyone else is capable of. everyone makes their own choices. everyone decides for themselves exactly who they need to be, and i can't say that anyone's needs are invalid just because i wouldn't want to make the same choices. nobody is beneath me. people always will always know the difference between looking up, and looking down on others as exactly what they're capable of. and which is a want, and which is a need.
>
> and then there's the second type. and they're just never around when anything matters.
tl;dr
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,276
@previous (Phatthew Phosteet Philler)you know you read it. you could just choose not to interact with me. but instead you choose to interact with me because you want me to think that you choose to ignore me. i could choose to ignore you pretending to ignore me but i'd be pretending i choose to ignore you pretending to ignore me by interacting with me pretending i'm not interacting with you interacting with me pretending we didn't pretend to not be pretending to pretend to be not interacting. and two can pretend to be not pretending to pretend to not pretend to play at pretending that game is not being pretended to be pretended to play.
Phatthew Phosteet Philler replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,277
@previous ((½,0)⨁(0,½))
> you know you read it. you could just choose not to interact with me. but instead you choose to interact with me because you want me to think that you choose to ignore me. i could choose to ignore you pretending to ignore me but i'd be pretending i choose to ignore you pretending to ignore me by interacting with me pretending i'm not interacting with you interacting with me pretending we didn't pretend to not be pretending to pretend to be not interacting. and two can pretend to be not pretending to pretend to not pretend to play at pretending that game is not being pretended to be pretended to play.
See @1,229,229 (Phatthew Phosteet Philler)
> you know you read it. you could just choose not to interact with me. but instead you choose to interact with me because you want me to think that you choose to ignore me. i could choose to ignore you pretending to ignore me but i'd be pretending i choose to ignore you pretending to ignore me by interacting with me pretending i'm not interacting with you interacting with me pretending we didn't pretend to not be pretending to pretend to be not interacting. and two can pretend to be not pretending to pretend to not pretend to play at pretending that game is not being pretended to be pretended to play.
See @1,229,229 (Phatthew Phosteet Philler)
(½,0)⨁(0,½) (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,229,298
