Topic: Sleepaway Camp
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #110,323
He has a COCK!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,228,671
is that a tv show
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,677
@previous (B)
Jack Daniels is paying elementary school teachers for each student they enroll in "gender affirming camp" a drag-run camp where children are given clothing of the opposite sex.
They also pay for legal support when one of the parents objects.
Jack Daniels is paying elementary school teachers for each student they enroll in "gender affirming camp" a drag-run camp where children are given clothing of the opposite sex.
They also pay for legal support when one of the parents objects.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,680
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 17 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,681
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,683
@1,228,677 (C)
if its the gender the kids want who gives a crap
let em play around
not hurting anyone as opposed to oh, guns, the oil industry, corruption in elections…..
if its the gender the kids want who gives a crap
let em play around
not hurting anyone as opposed to oh, guns, the oil industry, corruption in elections…..
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,687
@previous (B)
The teachers get more money the more kids the push into these camps.
Paid for by a grant you support by buying Jack (Jane?) Daniels.
The kids just want to make their teacher happy.
The teachers get more money the more kids the push into these camps.
Paid for by a grant you support by buying Jack (Jane?) Daniels.
The kids just want to make their teacher happy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,688
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,689
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,691
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,694
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,699
Father Merrin, I am dying and need EXTREME UNCTION!
squeegee joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,707
@1,228,691 (A)
that's all their outrage ever is, insincere assertions of a false reality they want to be real, causing collateral harm to the mental health of the kids they claim to be desperate to save, all while ignoring the number one killer of children under 18, and preventing anything from being done to reduce the death toll.
it's wildly delusional hypocrisy from the half of the country who's primary motivating objective is to see others butthurt and tears to make fun of and laugh at. and it's obvious in every aspect of the way they relate to others especially with different viewpoints.
and they can dish out whatever mean spirited small mindedness and defend it as a joke, and expect they should be allowed to, but can't take it in kind without deep insecurity and wage vendettas in spite of all decency, and justify harm as deserved and your own fault.
you know. like kook.
ha, I'm just kidding.
that's all their outrage ever is, insincere assertions of a false reality they want to be real, causing collateral harm to the mental health of the kids they claim to be desperate to save, all while ignoring the number one killer of children under 18, and preventing anything from being done to reduce the death toll.
it's wildly delusional hypocrisy from the half of the country who's primary motivating objective is to see others butthurt and tears to make fun of and laugh at. and it's obvious in every aspect of the way they relate to others especially with different viewpoints.
and they can dish out whatever mean spirited small mindedness and defend it as a joke, and expect they should be allowed to, but can't take it in kind without deep insecurity and wage vendettas in spite of all decency, and justify harm as deserved and your own fault.
you know. like kook.
ha, I'm just kidding.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,745
@previous (squeegee)
Do you have a source for that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Do you have a source for that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,784
@1,228,707 (squeegee)
> all while ignoring the number one killer of children under 18, and preventing anything from being done to reduce the death toll.
Just 4% of childhood firearm deaths are accidential.
94% of childhood firearm deaths are either suicide or homicide.
The remaining 2% are undetermined.
The second leading cause of death is motor vehicle accidents which is nearly tied with firearms and exceeded it for many years.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmsr1804754
Do you really think banning firearms is going to end suicide or homicide?
Maybe we should just ban homicide. Oh wait...
Why is no one talking about how many children are being killed by cars? It's almost like no one truly gives a shit and children are just political talking points like usual.
> all while ignoring the number one killer of children under 18, and preventing anything from being done to reduce the death toll.
Just 4% of childhood firearm deaths are accidential.
94% of childhood firearm deaths are either suicide or homicide.
The remaining 2% are undetermined.
The second leading cause of death is motor vehicle accidents which is nearly tied with firearms and exceeded it for many years.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmsr1804754
Do you really think banning firearms is going to end suicide or homicide?
Maybe we should just ban homicide. Oh wait...
Why is no one talking about how many children are being killed by cars? It's almost like no one truly gives a shit and children are just political talking points like usual.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,815
@previous (F)
Skweeg wants kids disarmed so they grow up to be slaves to the state.
Disarmed workers can't demand their rights, they rely on benevolence from their masters.
Skweeg wants kids disarmed so they grow up to be slaves to the state.
Disarmed workers can't demand their rights, they rely on benevolence from their masters.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,818
@1,228,745 (C)
Sure do -> @1,228,745 (C)
Exemplary one, I should say. I'm just making an appeal to authority who lives the example.
But here's an article you can read if you find yourself full of shit:
https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2023/04/05/worry-about-shootings-in-schools-not-about-drag-shows/
And another:
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2022/12/09/drag-performers-join-gays-against-guns-to-decry-nationwide-attacks/
And another...
https://www.themarysue.com/texas-politician-wants-to-ban-kids-from-drag-shows-do-nothing-about-guns/
...nother one...
https://greensboro.com/opinion/editorial/our-opinion-guns-at-any-cost/article_eb630912-cfcc-11ed-9d29-b38d470bef63.html
...John steward alleges it in a video going around social media...
https://fb.watch/jQBOgzo-Ui/?mibextid=YCRy0i
I mean, God damn, YES I HAVE FUCKING SOURCES. do you think I'm a just pulling stupid fucking oversimplified generalizations out of my ass like, "We should just ban murder," to weasel out of having a difficult conversation?
No, we're not fixing the problem by arguing about it here, I'm characterizing the, "nothing can stop death, it's inevitable, cars are dangerous too," attitude of insincere blowhards. yeah, well, when jerk-offs start driving through the hallways of school HUNTING CHILDREN to SLAUGHTER then I'll consider that a thoughtful, insightful, careful opinion not the flippant remark of someone who hasn't bothered to even pay attention to the way the wind blows between their ears.
Here's another one...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.huffpost.com/entry/drag-queen-story-hour-children-bans-guns_n_6410f2abe4b0a3902d2d8557/amp
Start reading if you're going to ASK FOR IT cause you didn't even bother to do a cursory search and see if you'd look like a fucking jackass.
You don't need a source, you need a moron to think for you.
When you respond, it better be with a full throated gurgling.
Sure do -> @1,228,745 (C)
Exemplary one, I should say. I'm just making an appeal to authority who lives the example.
But here's an article you can read if you find yourself full of shit:
https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2023/04/05/worry-about-shootings-in-schools-not-about-drag-shows/
And another:
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2022/12/09/drag-performers-join-gays-against-guns-to-decry-nationwide-attacks/
And another...
https://www.themarysue.com/texas-politician-wants-to-ban-kids-from-drag-shows-do-nothing-about-guns/
...nother one...
https://greensboro.com/opinion/editorial/our-opinion-guns-at-any-cost/article_eb630912-cfcc-11ed-9d29-b38d470bef63.html
...John steward alleges it in a video going around social media...
https://fb.watch/jQBOgzo-Ui/?mibextid=YCRy0i
I mean, God damn, YES I HAVE FUCKING SOURCES. do you think I'm a just pulling stupid fucking oversimplified generalizations out of my ass like, "We should just ban murder," to weasel out of having a difficult conversation?
No, we're not fixing the problem by arguing about it here, I'm characterizing the, "nothing can stop death, it's inevitable, cars are dangerous too," attitude of insincere blowhards. yeah, well, when jerk-offs start driving through the hallways of school HUNTING CHILDREN to SLAUGHTER then I'll consider that a thoughtful, insightful, careful opinion not the flippant remark of someone who hasn't bothered to even pay attention to the way the wind blows between their ears.
Here's another one...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.huffpost.com/entry/drag-queen-story-hour-children-bans-guns_n_6410f2abe4b0a3902d2d8557/amp
Start reading if you're going to ASK FOR IT cause you didn't even bother to do a cursory search and see if you'd look like a fucking jackass.
You don't need a source, you need a moron to think for you.
When you respond, it better be with a full throated gurgling.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G double-posted this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,819
@1,228,815 (C)
No, wait, your loquacious and moving oratory and insightful, well reasoned, impassioned and honorable sense of justice has persuaded me.
There are intelligent minds among man and machine, and there are language models generating thought like arrangements behind which there is utter vacancy, digital-like chemical, meat compootors.
No, wait, your loquacious and moving oratory and insightful, well reasoned, impassioned and honorable sense of justice has persuaded me.
There are intelligent minds among man and machine, and there are language models generating thought like arrangements behind which there is utter vacancy, digital-like chemical, meat compootors.
Anonymous G triple-posted this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,820
Try thinking first. The whole generating the next word on-fly, cross your fingers, hope it works thing...
Not for everyone. Think first. Don't just start talking and hope for the best.
It's not the best. It's not.
I mean, be glad you're anonymous don't have to have any reason to feel accountable for being so God damn fucking wrong all the time. Jesus christ
Not for everyone. Think first. Don't just start talking and hope for the best.
It's not the best. It's not.
I mean, be glad you're anonymous don't have to have any reason to feel accountable for being so God damn fucking wrong all the time. Jesus christ
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 57 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,821
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,822
@previous (A)
Proving my point. That's all their outrage ever is, insincere assertions of a false reality they want to be real, causing collateral harm to the mental health of the kids they claim to be desperate to save, all while ignoring the number one killer of children under 18, and preventing anything from being done to reduce the death toll.
it's wildly delusional hypocrisy from the half of the country who's primary motivating objective is to see others butthurt and tears to make fun of and laugh at. and it's obvious in every aspect of the way they relate to others especially with different viewpoints.
and they can dish out whatever mean spirited small mindedness and defend it as a joke, and expect they should be allowed to, but can't take it in kind without deep insecurity and wage vendettas in spite of all decency, and justify harm as deserved and your own fault.
Goto 10 spam meme;
Proving my point. That's all their outrage ever is, insincere assertions of a false reality they want to be real, causing collateral harm to the mental health of the kids they claim to be desperate to save, all while ignoring the number one killer of children under 18, and preventing anything from being done to reduce the death toll.
it's wildly delusional hypocrisy from the half of the country who's primary motivating objective is to see others butthurt and tears to make fun of and laugh at. and it's obvious in every aspect of the way they relate to others especially with different viewpoints.
and they can dish out whatever mean spirited small mindedness and defend it as a joke, and expect they should be allowed to, but can't take it in kind without deep insecurity and wage vendettas in spite of all decency, and justify harm as deserved and your own fault.
Goto 10 spam meme;
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,825
@1,228,818 (G)
The point of that pasta is to mock people who ask for sources, not a genuine prompt for one.
The point of that pasta is to mock people who ask for sources, not a genuine prompt for one.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,826
@1,228,822 (G)
Banning guns (attempting to really, these laws aren't effective) isn't going to save those kids.
If people cared about them they'd wonder why they were homicidal to begin with.
Guns aren't going away, even with strict legislation, and if it did work you'd be disarming the most vulnerable first while the powerful could still use police to abuse the lower classes.
Banning guns (attempting to really, these laws aren't effective) isn't going to save those kids.
If people cared about them they'd wonder why they were homicidal to begin with.
Guns aren't going away, even with strict legislation, and if it did work you'd be disarming the most vulnerable first while the powerful could still use police to abuse the lower classes.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 8 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,838
@1,228,825 (C)
Are you kidding, why would you do that to me? I just start typing and hope for the best. That's what you get for talking to my brain. I tune most stuff out.
Are you kidding, why would you do that to me? I just start typing and hope for the best. That's what you get for talking to my brain. I tune most stuff out.
Anonymous G double-posted this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,839
@1,228,826 (C)
Guns aren't where the solution is. It's in ammunition. The consumable part. We can make it way more difficult to distribute and we already run shortages on popular rounds. Bottle neck it, people can still stockpile but it will take time and effort -which gun nuts will do anyway, people can plan ahead.
Mass shooters don't generally have great amounts of planning, they're more spree mass shooters and oftentimes we read how recently purchases were made. Make it take months to get rounds without extra steps, like filing an application with police to buy bulk, so police at least know when an 18 year old is buying 1,000 rounds of AR ammo and can call them in for simple paperwork and look them in the eyes.
It doesn't have to be super hard, but it doesn't have to be raining ammo and gunpowder either. We have a right to bear ARMS.
The constitution. Was pre cartridge ammo. It was musket balls and a hollow sheep's horn with black powder.
Sell that and make kids have to register S a gunsmith to make rounds -it's not super hard, but it takes tools and know how and is an extra step.
Of course we can't stop gun manufacture. But we can gimp ammo. We'll know waaaay before any "scenario" involving militia style taking up arms. If it's for personal defense. Home protection, how many rounds normally get used in that situation? Not boxes and boxes. Buy what can be shot at the range in unlimited quantity. Walk out with a box, otherwise, come back later.
IT'S HOW THEY SELL WEED! But 10k rounds of 9mm short rounds, sure, no problem surly pouty faced white teenager.
Rounds. Lock em down. It's retarded. They lock up shaving razors but sporting goods open racks you can sweep into your cart in bulk. Raise the cost. Something.
I never hear anyone talk about limiting ammo sales, just guns. It's a red herring and gun people, real gun people know it. They'll tell you. Stockpile ammo. It won't be so easy forever.
Libs are retarded, they don't own guns and they don't know shit about the 1 thing that's going to work. Guns are clubs. Ammo, that's the lethal bit.
Guns aren't where the solution is. It's in ammunition. The consumable part. We can make it way more difficult to distribute and we already run shortages on popular rounds. Bottle neck it, people can still stockpile but it will take time and effort -which gun nuts will do anyway, people can plan ahead.
Mass shooters don't generally have great amounts of planning, they're more spree mass shooters and oftentimes we read how recently purchases were made. Make it take months to get rounds without extra steps, like filing an application with police to buy bulk, so police at least know when an 18 year old is buying 1,000 rounds of AR ammo and can call them in for simple paperwork and look them in the eyes.
It doesn't have to be super hard, but it doesn't have to be raining ammo and gunpowder either. We have a right to bear ARMS.
The constitution. Was pre cartridge ammo. It was musket balls and a hollow sheep's horn with black powder.
Sell that and make kids have to register S a gunsmith to make rounds -it's not super hard, but it takes tools and know how and is an extra step.
Of course we can't stop gun manufacture. But we can gimp ammo. We'll know waaaay before any "scenario" involving militia style taking up arms. If it's for personal defense. Home protection, how many rounds normally get used in that situation? Not boxes and boxes. Buy what can be shot at the range in unlimited quantity. Walk out with a box, otherwise, come back later.
IT'S HOW THEY SELL WEED! But 10k rounds of 9mm short rounds, sure, no problem surly pouty faced white teenager.
Rounds. Lock em down. It's retarded. They lock up shaving razors but sporting goods open racks you can sweep into your cart in bulk. Raise the cost. Something.
I never hear anyone talk about limiting ammo sales, just guns. It's a red herring and gun people, real gun people know it. They'll tell you. Stockpile ammo. It won't be so easy forever.
Libs are retarded, they don't own guns and they don't know shit about the 1 thing that's going to work. Guns are clubs. Ammo, that's the lethal bit.